|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
****** Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 21:27:36 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: This is because you are a law breaking ******. It's because I have common sense. It's because you have no brains and are a smelly unwashed ******, Birdbrain! -- More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) "wisdom": "Look at a donkey with a 2 foot penis. Does it require underwear? No." MID: |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
****** Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 22:07:59 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: No, it's your pathetically stupid opinion with no facts to back it up. That's what every single retarded post of YOURS is all about, you abnormal endlessly driveling sick idiot! -- More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) "knowledge" LOL: "I heard a long time ago that it was possible to breathe water or something similar. It was either special fluid they could use for divers instead of gas, or it was certain people who could learn to breathe actual water, I can't remember which. Or it could have been that babies can actually breathe water as that's what they do in the womb." MID: |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting report for Australian cyclists about cycling onthe pavement (specifically in NSW)
On 09.12.2017 10:00, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:31:56 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Rob Morley wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:48:47 +0000 Bod wrote: "Why I support the call to allow cyclists to ride on footpaths in NSW" The constant police crackdowns on cyclists combined with some of the world's most expensive fines highlight Sydney's backwards attitude towards something that should be encouraged. In addition to the whopping $319 fine riders face for wearing no helmet - despite studies showing it doesn't improve safety - the horrific crime of riding on a footpath is also the subject of the constant police operations. The law stipulates that children under 12 years of age can ride on a footpath and an adult rider supervising a cyclist under 12 can also do the same. For everyone else there is a $106 fine for the act. http://www.news.com.au/technology/in...fc2eaf25080934 The problem with /allowing/ cycling on footpaths is that it encourages the perception that cyclists /should/ ride on footpaths - granted there are some footpaths whose use is generally preferable to the main carriageway, but there are many where it's not only slower but also more hazardous. There are no footpaths in this nation where it is "preferable" to ride a pedal bike on. Oh shut up you unfit useless lazy bugger who can't cycle more than 100 yards. Have you ever in your worthless life made any constructive contribution to any thread? If so, show us. Have you? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting report for Australian cyclists about cycling on the pavement (specifically in NSW)
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 21:03:20 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:16:55 -0000, Rob Morley wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:48:47 +0000 Bod wrote: "Why I support the call to allow cyclists to ride on footpaths in NSW" The constant police crackdowns on cyclists combined with some of the world's most expensive fines highlight Sydney's backwards attitude towards something that should be encouraged. In addition to the whopping $319 fine riders face for wearing no helmet - despite studies showing it doesn't improve safety - the horrific crime of riding on a footpath is also the subject of the constant police operations. The law stipulates that children under 12 years of age can ride on a footpath and an adult rider supervising a cyclist under 12 can also do the same. For everyone else there is a $106 fine for the act. http://www.news.com.au/technology/in...fc2eaf25080934 The problem with /allowing/ cycling on footpaths is that it encourages the perception that cyclists /should/ ride on footpaths - granted there are some footpaths whose use is generally preferable to the main carriageway, but there are many where it's not only slower but also more hazardous. I mainly drive and occasionally cycle. As a driver I'd prefer if the cyclists were on the footpath, so they don't impede traffic. As a cyclist I always use the footpath if the road is busier (safer and easier). The law does not care what YOU might prefer. This is because you are a law breaking ******. It's because I have common sense. Why obstruct cars with the bicycle? Why endanger yourself on the bicycle? Common sense - PMSL. As pedestrian I don't care at all, I just step to the side to let cyclists past. This is because you are a gutless little ******. It's because I don't regard cyclists as a different species. You'd step to the side of another pedestrian wouldn't you? What about a jogger/runner (going at cycling speeds)? So what's the difference? Joggers and runners on the footpath are *pedestrians.* A cyclist riding on the footpath is in charge of a ROAD vehicle and should not be riding on the footpath. Bloody hell, you are thick. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting report for Australian cyclists about cycling on the pavement (specifically in NSW)
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:38:15 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 21:03:20 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 20:16:55 -0000, Rob Morley wrote: On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 08:48:47 +0000 Bod wrote: "Why I support the call to allow cyclists to ride on footpaths in NSW" The constant police crackdowns on cyclists combined with some of the world's most expensive fines highlight Sydney's backwards attitude towards something that should be encouraged. In addition to the whopping $319 fine riders face for wearing no helmet - despite studies showing it doesn't improve safety - the horrific crime of riding on a footpath is also the subject of the constant police operations. The law stipulates that children under 12 years of age can ride on a footpath and an adult rider supervising a cyclist under 12 can also do the same. For everyone else there is a $106 fine for the act. http://www.news.com.au/technology/in...fc2eaf25080934 The problem with /allowing/ cycling on footpaths is that it encourages the perception that cyclists /should/ ride on footpaths - granted there are some footpaths whose use is generally preferable to the main carriageway, but there are many where it's not only slower but also more hazardous. I mainly drive and occasionally cycle. As a driver I'd prefer if the cyclists were on the footpath, so they don't impede traffic. As a cyclist I always use the footpath if the road is busier (safer and easier). The law does not care what YOU might prefer. Most people ignore the law - how many people are caught speeding every year? This is because you are a law breaking ******. It's because I have common sense. Why obstruct cars with the bicycle? Why endanger yourself on the bicycle? Common sense - PMSL. Tell me why you would cycle on a busy road instead of a quiet pavement. As pedestrian I don't care at all, I just step to the side to let cyclists past. This is because you are a gutless little ******. It's because I don't regard cyclists as a different species. You'd step to the side of another pedestrian wouldn't you? What about a jogger/runner (going at cycling speeds)? So what's the difference? Joggers and runners on the footpath are *pedestrians.* A cyclist riding on the footpath is in charge of a ROAD vehicle and should not be riding on the footpath. Bloody hell, you are thick. SAME SPEED, read it again. Speed has nothing to do with it. Pedestrians and road vehicles has everything to do with it. Bloody hell you are thick. No wonder you are a delivery boy claiming tax credits - and that is all you ever will be. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
****** Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 22:33:29 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: Look up section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act, Birdbrain. Why? That's just the opinion of the **** that wrote it. Take note of all the shared use pavements there are..... We take note of your invincible STUPIDITY, Birdbrain! -- More details from Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) strange world: "We should be allowed to do as we wish within reason. For example": "Smoke weed in a public place, drive as fast as we like, and do both of those stark naked. Oh and **** in public". (Courtesy of Mr Pounder) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
****** Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson" LOL), the Sociopathic Attention Whore
On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 22:32:50 -0000, Birdbrain Macaw (now "James Wilkinson"),
the pathological attention whore of all the uk ngs, blathered again: Speed has nothing to do with it. Pedestrians and road vehicles has everything to do with it. Bloody hell you are thick. No wonder you are a delivery boy claiming tax credits - and that is all you ever will be. Why do you think a cyclist doing 15mph is more dangerous than a runner doing 15mph? Why are you dumber than any other dumb Usenet troll, Birdbrain? -- More of Birdbrain Macaw's (now "James Wilkinson" LOL) "wisdom": "Look at a donkey with a 2 foot penis. Does it require underwear? No." MID: |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
An interesting report for Australian cyclists about cycling on the pavement (specifically in NSW)
On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 21:00:49 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire"
wrote: [] Have you ever in your worthless life made any constructive contribution to any thread? If so, show us. PKB |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting report | Tom Crispin | UK | 15 | May 17th 08 09:52 PM |
Police target South Australian cyclists | deejbah[_2_] | Australia | 133 | January 15th 08 09:00 AM |
interesting report | [email protected] | Mountain Biking | 30 | November 6th 06 06:54 PM |
Australian h*lm*t report | Just zis Guy, you know? | Social Issues | 3 | May 11th 05 04:00 PM |
Australian h*lm*t report | Just zis Guy, you know? | UK | 1 | May 11th 05 11:16 AM |