|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#161
|
|||
|
|||
Brighton Cyclist 900 quid down
"thirty-six" wrote
On 16 Oct, 23:17, "DavidR" wrote: Besides, when the law was drawn up, street lamps were inferior to now yet it was considered sufficient to drive on 5W sidelights. I still do where the law permits. In many cases I can see more useful information. Good on you. Actually this has got me wondering whether when there is overhead light, the people that use foglights may be onto something - providing heads are not used at the same time. The only worthwhile purpose I can determine of using lights that cast a beam outside hours of darkness is at a right turn with short sightlines when the wash of a hidden vehicle might be visible. |
Ads |
#162
|
|||
|
|||
Brighton Cyclist 900 quid down
"thirty-six" wrote in
On 19 Oct, 00:37, "DavidR" wrote: I was shocked when I drove my mother's car recently. It has just passed an MoT so I assume they are set according to requirements yet they were very high indeed, barely below horizontal on the level and as it bobbed over bumps, the top of the beam was penetrating the distance. I'm sure that years ago a setting like this would have received angry exchanges from oncoming drivers. So I'm not surprised that getting a faceful is so commonplace when there must be loads of cars like this out there. The MOT tester will sometimes adjust the headlight during the test as a favour. Unfortunately, the conditions of testing require that an optical box thingumejig be used and not the wall or ground. I would hope a testing sstation is obligated to have a calibrated optical box thingumejig. False settings do occur, I don't know what causes this. Best to carry the appropriate adjusting tool and set them as best you can against a distant wall for high beam, then further refine the setting in fog. Fog... thinks... er 1978 |
#163
|
|||
|
|||
Brighton Cyclist 900 quid down
On 19 Oct, 23:42, "DavidR" wrote:
"thirty-six" wrote in On 19 Oct, 00:37, "DavidR" wrote: I was shocked when I drove my mother's car recently. It has just passed an MoT so I assume they are set according to requirements yet they were very high indeed, barely below horizontal on the level and as it bobbed over bumps, the top of the beam was penetrating the distance. I'm sure that years ago a setting like this would have received angry exchanges from oncoming drivers. So I'm not surprised that getting a faceful is so commonplace when there must be loads of cars like this out there. The MOT tester will sometimes adjust the headlight during the test as a favour. *Unfortunately, the conditions of testing require that an optical box thingumejig be used and not the wall or ground. I would hope a testing sstation is obligated to have a calibrated optical box thingumejig. They are also supposed to know how to use them. Never mind. False settings do occur, I don't know what causes this. *Best to carry the appropriate adjusting tool and set them as best you can against a distant wall for high beam, then further refine the setting in fog. Fog... thinks... er 1978 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Disabled cyclist denied access to Brighton Pier. | Doug[_10_] | UK | 70 | August 21st 10 09:07 AM |
Cyclist hits granny in pavement crash in Brighton | [email protected] | UK | 167 | February 1st 09 10:44 AM |
Cyclist Dies in Brighton | Andrew Richardson | UK | 201 | November 25th 05 06:40 PM |
Anyone know the cyclist who got hit by a car on Wednesday (23 Nov) in Brighton? | Bleve | Australia | 16 | November 25th 05 11:22 AM |
Easy 15 quid. | Simon Mason | UK | 4 | June 12th 05 08:41 PM |