|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
I'm starting to research buying a new bike to indulge my newfound fixed gear addiction. (My existing fixie is my '88 Miyata road bike with tri geometry, a way too short top tube, worn out drivetrain parts and a hack of a fixie hub - epoxied freewheel. It'll cost enough money to get the fit and parts right that I'd rather start new). Price isn't an issue. I assumed I'd want a frame with similar geometry to my road bikes, 73/73. I notice that the Cannondale and Fuji track bikes have 74.5 head tube and 73 or 72.5 seat tube angles. Why so steep head tube angles? Is that preferred for actual velodrome riding for some reason, perhaps sprinting? The top tubes are still longish, 57cm for the 56 cm Cannondale frame. Any suggestions on frame size (I ride 57 and 58 cm road bikes now) - any reason to step down in frame size like you do on a cyclocross frame? BTW, my favorite bike is my aluminum Cannondale road bike with Spinergy Spox wheels - I love the stiff frame, and the composite spokes dampen the road shock. My ideal new fixie would be a regular new Cannondale road frame with Spox wheels with the freehub replaced with the Surly cassette hub converter, except that the regular road frames have vertical dropouts. I'd consider the road frame with the White eccentric hub to solve the dropout problem, but seems like at that point I might as well get the track frame. That brings me back to the geometry issue I asked about above.... Thanks, Michael |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Michael Press writes:
I notice that the Cannondale and Fuji track bikes have 74.5 head tube and 73 or 72.5 seat tube angles. Why so steep head tube angles? Is that preferred for actual velodrome riding for some reason, perhaps sprinting? Track racers really don't turn the bars- riding on a steeply banked velodrome, you basically keep riding in a straight line all the way around the track. Track bikes tend to have steep head tubes and seat tubes (75/75 is not all that unusual in a track bike) and very little fork offset (sometimes called rake), giving them a fairly large trail. My track bike is exceptionally easy to ride no-handed as a result. The position on a track bike is not really intended for comfort, as few events last longer than a few minutes- a 50 or 75 lap points race being about as long as track events get which is under 20 km and will last at most about 20-25 minutes. At least until you get to 6 day events and such, but it's not likely that any of us will be doing that. Any suggestions on frame size (I ride 57 and 58 cm road bikes now) - any reason to step down in frame size like you do on a cyclocross frame? No. Same as your road bike (I also think that since most people are riding undersized road bikes, they may as well use the same size for 'cross). My advice is to test ride and see what you're the most comfortable riding. If you're riding this on the road, then a more road-like seat tube angle will probably help you find a comfortable position for longer rides. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Tim McNamara wrote:
Track racers really don't turn the bars- riding on a steeply banked velodrome, you basically keep riding in a straight line all the way around the track. Track bikes tend to have steep head tubes and seat tubes (75/75 is not all that unusual in a track bike) and very little fork offset (sometimes called rake), giving them a fairly large trail. My track bike is exceptionally easy to ride no-handed as a result. Is there an (a?) FAQ somewhere that discusses the definitions of rake, trail, and other such parameters, and their effects to the user? (And if not, there should be one!) -- Benjamin Lewis A small, but vocal, contingent even argues that tin is superior, but they are held by most to be the lunatic fringe of Foil Deflector Beanie science. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Track racers really don't turn the bars- riding on a steeply banked velodrome, you basically keep riding in a straight line all the way around the track. That's not really true. Yo do have to steer a track bike, just not much. The trick is to drop your inside elbow as you enter the turn, giving you a bit of steering. Works on the road, too. Phil Brown |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Benjamin Lewis wrote in message ...
Is there an (a?) FAQ somewhere that discusses the definitions of rake, trail, and other such parameters, and their effects to the user? (And if not, there should be one!) "Rake" means different things to bicycle and motorcycle people. "Trail" is the distance from the intersection of the steering axis to the center of the contact patch of the tire. These dimensions and their interactions are the subject of at least one upper level engineering course: http://www.calpoly.edu/~wpatters/ and the subject of much debate. I doubt they can be reduced to a FAQ. Jeff Wills |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Jeff Wills wrote:
Benjamin Lewis wrote: Is there an (a?) FAQ somewhere that discusses the definitions of rake, trail, and other such parameters, and their effects to the user? (And if not, there should be one!) "Rake" means different things to bicycle and motorcycle people. "Trail" is the distance from the intersection of the steering axis to the center of the contact patch of the tire. These dimensions and their interactions are the subject of at least one upper level engineering course: http://www.calpoly.edu/~wpatters/ and the subject of much debate. I doubt they can be reduced to a FAQ. I'd be satisfied with a lengthy discourse, too Ideally I'd like to learn more about this without leaving my seat, but if anyone can suggest any good books on the subject that might be available in the library I'd appreciate that too. -- Benjamin Lewis Although the moon is smaller than the earth, it is farther away. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
--On Sunday, June 06, 2004 12:57 PM -0700 Benjamin Lewis
wrote: Ideally I'd like to learn more about this without leaving my seat, but if anyone can suggest any good books on the subject that might be available in the library I'd appreciate that too. Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, by Thomas D. Gillespie I'm not sure this covers bikes and motorcycles, but its a good resource anyway. a good engineering library (such as one at a university) should have a copy. Mike Mechanical Engineering 2006, Carnegie Mellon University Remove nospam to reply. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
Benjamin Lewis wrote:
Is there an (a?) FAQ somewhere that discusses the definitions of rake, trail, and other such parameters, and their effects to the user? (And if not, there should be one!) Look up "Trail" in my Bicycle Glossary, there's a link to a good article on this. Sheldon "http://sheldonbrown.com/glossary" Brown +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Check out the Shostakovich 24 Preludes & Fugues for Piano, Op. 87. | | Sort of like "Das Wohltemperierte Klavier" on drugs. Way cool! | +---------------------------------------------------------------------+ Harris Cyclery, West Newton, Massachusetts Phone 617-244-9772 FAX 617-244-1041 http://harriscyclery.com Hard-to-find parts shipped Worldwide http://captainbike.com http://sheldonbrown.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Fixed gear/track frame geometry
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FA: 54cm Fixed gear 700c Road frame | Ian Yates | General | 5 | October 22nd 03 10:35 AM |
Compact frame vs Traditional Frame geometry | Dennis Vaughn | Techniques | 39 | September 4th 03 02:10 AM |