RESULT : Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated

On 21 Sep, 19:43, Tom Crispin
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:25:38 +0100, Jon Ribbens

wrote:

[uk.rec.cycling put back into the NG line. *It is customary to warn
posters if follow-ups have been set]

RESULT OF CALL FOR VOTES

Summary: Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated

Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24

I hope the new group succeeds.

Why would somebody who is not the slightest bit interested in a
censored newsgroup bother to vote? Wouldn't this fact skew the vote in
its favour anyway?

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's newsgroup is another man's censorship.

Doug wrote:
On 21 Sep, 19:43, Tom Crispin
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:25:38 +0100, Jon Ribbens

wrote:

[uk.rec.cycling put back into the NG line. It is customary to warn
posters if follow-ups have been set]

RESULT OF CALL FOR VOTES
Summary: Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
I hope the new group succeeds.

Why would somebody who is not the slightest bit interested in a
censored newsgroup bother to vote? Wouldn't this fact skew the vote in
its favour anyway?



We have been informed that all the '****wits' will clear off and leave
urc to 'sensible' people. To that end it is important for urcm to be
created or then '****wits' won't **** off.
That it gives the '****wits' somewhere cosy to sit and pop in to urc to
feed the flames now and then is a bonus.


--

Come to Dave & Boris - your cycle security experts.

On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:07:28 +0100, Keitht KeithT wrote:

Doug wrote:
On 21 Sep, 19:43, Tom Crispin
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 19:25:38 +0100, Jon Ribbens

wrote:

[uk.rec.cycling put back into the NG line. It is customary to warn
posters if follow-ups have been set]

RESULT OF CALL FOR VOTES
Summary: Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated
Create moderated newsgroup uk.rec.cycling.moderated PASSES 128:24
I hope the new group succeeds.

Why would somebody who is not the slightest bit interested in a
censored newsgroup bother to vote? Wouldn't this fact skew the vote in
its favour anyway?



We have been informed that all the '****wits' will clear off and leave
urc to 'sensible' people. To that end it is important for urcm to be
created or then '****wits' won't **** off.
That it gives the '****wits' somewhere cosy to sit and pop in to urc to
feed the flames now and then is a bonus.


Spot on - looking forward to it.

--
Latest DfT Figures: Passenger casualty rates by mode Per billion passenger kilometers:
Killed or seriously injured: Pedal Cyclists : 527 Pedestrians 371
All casualties: Pedal Cyclists : 3494 Pedestrians : 1631
Which is more dangerous?