Truth for all US people

Spender wrote:
:: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:34:16 -0500, "Anthony Williams"
:: wrote:
::
:::
::: "Spender" wrote in message
::: ews.com...
:::: On Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:05:05 -0400, HK
:::: wrote:
::::
::::: Calif Bill wrote:
::::::
:::::: True, but people born on a reservation are considered US
:::::: Citizens now. Rules change as interpretations change. Why I
:::::: said the court has not ruled
:::::: on the anchor babies, but they could very well declare them non
:::::: citizens.
:::::: The law does not stand as it reads. As the court has not really
:::::: said what
:::::: it reads.
:::::
::::: Even the right-wing court we now have is not going down that road,
::::: bilious. Sorry, the days of white boy rule are over.
::::
:::: Right-wing? That is absurd.
:::
::: I think he is referring to the U.S. Supreme Court.
::
:: Yes, I know. So I pointed out that some European countries have
:: passed laws to ban anchor babies. They can hardly be considered
:: right-wing. So why would the SCOTUS be considered right-wing for
:: doing so?

It can't change the Constitution. There has to be a Constitutional amendment
to do that.

Pat in TX