One last political post

"g-spot" wrote in message
...


Bob Schwartz wrote:


People in red states are stupid.

Dumbass,

That may be true. However, stupidity is hardly bounded by the color red,
so the
qualification is meaningless. You are all dumbasses. Dumbassy knows no
bounds.

I know one thing. Anybody who can spell "dumbassy" AND use it properly in a
sentence isn't behaving stupidly.

-WG

g-spot wrote:

Bob Schwartz wrote:


People in red states are stupid.


Dumbass,

That may be true. However, stupidity is hardly bounded by the color red, so the
qualification is meaningless. You are all dumbasses. Dumbassy knows no bounds.

What happens when they change the colouring scheme?
Red-Blue distinctions are chosen by the media (surprise)

g-spot wrote:

Bob Schwartz wrote:


People in red states are stupid.


Dumbass,

That may be true. However, stupidity is hardly bounded by the color red, so the
qualification is meaningless. You are all dumbasses. Dumbassy knows no bounds.

What happens when they change the colouring scheme?
Red-Blue distinctions are chosen by the media (surprise)

psycholist wrote:


I believe it's "dumbassity" ... dumbass. ;-)

"Dumbassy shows no bounds" is a tautology.

psycholist wrote:


I believe it's "dumbassity" ... dumbass. ;-)

"Dumbassy shows no bounds" is a tautology.

"Warren" wrote in message
news

"g-spot" wrote in message
...


Bob Schwartz wrote:


People in red states are stupid.

Dumbass,

That may be true. However, stupidity is hardly bounded by the color red,
so the
qualification is meaningless. You are all dumbasses. Dumbassy knows no
bounds.

I know one thing. Anybody who can spell "dumbassy" AND use it properly in
a
sentence isn't behaving stupidly.

-WG


Do some of Bush's ambassador appointments make our posts in foreign
countries "dumbassies" or just "dumbassadors"?

"Warren" wrote in message
news

"g-spot" wrote in message
...


Bob Schwartz wrote:


People in red states are stupid.

Dumbass,

That may be true. However, stupidity is hardly bounded by the color red,
so the
qualification is meaningless. You are all dumbasses. Dumbassy knows no
bounds.

I know one thing. Anybody who can spell "dumbassy" AND use it properly in
a
sentence isn't behaving stupidly.

-WG


Do some of Bush's ambassador appointments make our posts in foreign
countries "dumbassies" or just "dumbassadors"?

Carl Sundquist wrote:

Do some of Bush's ambassador appointments make our posts in foreign
countries "dumbassies" or just "dumbassadors"?

You making fun of His Excellency Howard Leach?

Carl Sundquist wrote:

Do some of Bush's ambassador appointments make our posts in foreign
countries "dumbassies" or just "dumbassadors"?

You making fun of His Excellency Howard Leach?

Steve wrote:
"Bob Schwartz" wrote:

http://www.ucolick.org/~bjw/misc/obesity_vote2004.gif

These stupid "Chung Charts" mean nothing. Most states were won/lost by a few
percent. So that does not say who voted for who.. Since they are all over
12% they are ALL considered fattie masters by Henry and some other stuck-up
racer types.

Jesus H. Christ, Stevie, he posts a link to my plot on my webpage
and you call it a Chung Chart. (I'll have my revenge someday, Robert.)

I'd call you stupid for that, but misattributing credit is pretty much
standard operating procedure among science PhDs, so you're in good, if
dumbassed, company.

Almost HALF of the people in EVERY STATE voted for each candidate.

This stupid Blue state/ Red state categorizing is shooting your (democratic)
constituency in the ass!

That's a reasonably good point. So why are all the professional windbags
going around and moaning about Two Americas or boasting about the mandate
for extreme sports, sorry, extreme change? Because in fact there are
some real divisions, but they don't break down as neatly as the windbags
say, and even when they do it's 50-50. Which suggests that maybe
extreme change isn't as good an idea as it sounds.

And BTW, you do live in California, get used to it.