|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CFV Changes to URCM Charter
Here is a copy of a post which has been made in URCM by the moderators. I am surprised that they did not have the decency to post it here or in the cycling newsgroup. ================================================== ================================= FIRST CALL FOR VOTES (OF 2) AND BALLOT PAPER Amend Charter of uk.rec.cycling.moderated Statement from the moderators of uk.rec.cycling.moderated: Summary: We oppose this hostile CFV. It will - Forbid reasonable approaches to moderation. Specifically, it would prevent the use of a passlist, slowing much discussion. - Violate the privacy of transgressive posters; - Lead to more rather than fewer complaints and arguments. We recommend a NO vote. Our full reasons are as follows: 1. The proposed charter change would forbid a variety of moderation techniques which the urcm moderators and moderators of other moderated groups find useful. Examples of moderation techniques which the charter change would forbid include: - The passlist, which arranges to automatically approve articles by posters we consider unlikely to breach the moderation guidelines. This would mean that the principal effect of this change would be to slow down activity in the group. - Poster-specific limits on number of articles posted per day. We have in the past considered this, as a useful approach employed with new users of some other discussion mediums as a counter to sock puppetry. It is likely that if lesser tools are not available, we will find that we need to make more use of bans. 2. Transgressive posters, whom we find it necessary to ban, should not have their identities revealed. We do not think it appropriate that such disciplinary matters should be aired in public. To do so would be a breach of the poster's privacy. 3. The proposal is likely to lead to many more rejected posters claiming that their posts were rejected because of the poster's identity rather than the content. The result will be an increase in noise in the uk.* management groups. 4. We observe that urcm has already been the subject of three previous hostile RFDs, one intending to replace the moderators. In other usenet hierarchies, this level of interference with a moderation team would not be tolerated. For example in the Big 8 (rec.* etc., the B8MB say): It is highly unlikely that the board would publish proposals for: ... - removal of an active moderator or removal of a moderated group without the consent of the moderator. -- David Damerell Distortion Field! Today is Oneiros, December. Tomorrow will be Mania, December. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RFD: Amend charter of uk.rec.cycling.moderated | Judith[_4_] | UK | 0 | November 26th 12 01:31 PM |
3rd RFD: Amend charter of uk.rec.cycling.moderated | Judith[_4_] | UK | 3 | September 24th 12 11:36 AM |
rec.sport.unicycling charter | Unisykolist | Unicycling | 4 | April 22nd 08 06:17 AM |
revised aus.bicycle charter | hippy | Australia | 14 | January 12th 06 05:48 PM |
charter flight from Waterloo | Claudius Vitalis | Racing | 30 | July 13th 05 04:04 PM |