Dauphin‚ Lib‚r‚, stage 1 summary

Changes in stage 1 compared to stage 0

Biggest gainers by position :
+7 Peter Wrolich
+7 Morris Possoni
+7 Massimiliano Mori
+7 Leonardo Piepoli
+7 Jorge Azanza
+7 Christophe Brandt
+7 Blaise Sonnery
+7 Björn Leukemans
+7 André Korff
+6 Kevin Seeldraeyers

Biggest losers by position :
-104 Staf Scheirlinckx
-80 Remmert Wielinga
-25 Stéphane Augé
-16 Ángel Gómez Gómez
0 Alberto Contador
0 Alejandro Valverde
0 Alexander Vinokourov
0 Andrey Kashechkin
0 Andriy Grivko
0 Bert Grabsch
0 Bobby Julich

Biggest gainers by time :

Biggest losers by time :
-6:02 Staf Scheirlinckx
-3:47 Ángel Gómez Gómez
-0:36 Remmert Wielinga
-0:36 Stéphane Augé

Favourites by position :
+7 Leonardo Piepoli
+4 Manuel Beltrán
+2 Tadej Valjavec
+2 Iñigo Cuesta
+1 Serguei Ivanov

Favourites by time :

Top 3 and favourites standings :
1 Bradley Wiggins 5.39.55
2 Levi Leipheimer 0.01
3 Andrey Kashechkin 0.02
4 George Hincapie 0.02
5 Alejandro Valverde 0.03
6 David Zabriskie 0.03
.....
11 David Millar 0.06
.....
18 Alberto Contador 0.08
.....
20 Mikel Astarloza 0.09
21 Alexander Vinokourov 0.09
22 Denis Menchov 0.09
23 Christophe Moreau 0.09
.....
27 Oscar Pereiro 0.10
.....
29 Cadel Evans 0.11
.....
31 Bobby Julich 0.11
.....
40 Haimar Zubeldia 0.15
.....
43 Serguei Ivanov 0.16
.....
67 Iñigo Cuesta 0.18
.....
82 Tadej Valjavec 0.21
.....
122 Manuel Beltrán 0.29
.....
142 Leonardo Piepoli 0.44

Retirements to date :
Discovery Channel Tom Danielson
Milram Igor Astarloa
Rabobank Marc De Maar
Total retirements : 3

In article ,
Bob Martin wrote:


Changes in stage 1 compared to stage 0

Retirements to date :
Discovery Channel Tom Danielson
Milram Igor Astarloa
Rabobank Marc De Maar
Total retirements : 3

Three retirements during stage 1? Cyclingnews says stomach bug,
toxoplasmosis, and stomach bug.

Bad andouilette?

--
Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/
"I don't want kids who are thinking about going into mathematics
to think that they have to take drugs to succeed." -Paul Erdos

in 545583 20070613 022254 Ryan Cousineau wrote:
In article ,
Bob Martin wrote:


Changes in stage 1 compared to stage 0

Retirements to date :
Discovery Channel Tom Danielson
Milram Igor Astarloa
Rabobank Marc De Maar
Total retirements : 3

Three retirements during stage 1? Cyclingnews says stomach bug,
toxoplasmosis, and stomach bug.

Bad andouilette?

IKIANB Astarloa was a DNS stage 1.

Bob Martin wrote:
Total retirements : 3

Ryan Cousineau wrote:
Three retirements during stage 1? Cyclingnews says stomach bug,
toxoplasmosis, and stomach bug.

Bad andouilette?

Psst, don't tell Dick, but andoulette is the latest masking agent.

On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:03:14 +0200, Donald Munro wrote:
andoulette

Note spelling http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette

--
E. Dronkert

On Jun 13, 4:14 am, Ewoud Dronkert
wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 10:03:14 +0200, Donald Munro wrote:
andoulette

Note spellinghttp://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette
orhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette

Both spellings look the same to me.
And it's still roadkill stuffed in intestines.

R

RicodJour schreef:
On Jun 13, 4:14 am, Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
Note spelling http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette

Both spellings look the same to me.

Sure. Both pages have different appeal. The first has more of a story
(but in French) and links to pictures. The second has a link to some
funny stuff: http://www.gumbopages.com/food/icky.html


--
E. Dronkert

In article ,
Ewoud Dronkert wrote:

RicodJour schreef:
On Jun 13, 4:14 am, Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
Note spelling http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette
or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andouillette

Both spellings look the same to me.

Sure. Both pages have different appeal. The first has more of a story
(but in French) and links to pictures. The second has a link to some
funny stuff: http://www.gumbopages.com/food/icky.html

That guy doesn't like lima beans. Huh...

--
tanx,
Howard

Never take a tenant with a monkey.

remove YOUR SHOES to reply, ok?