|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Unlit cyclist attacks motorist with bicycle
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
On 13/04/2015 14:59, TMS320 wrote: "The Medway Handyman" wrote On 11/04/2015 20:23, TMS320 wrote: It's very straightforward. You have a car. Designation is irrelevant. I don't have a car. I have the use of a car. I could hire a car and have the use of it, but I wouldn't own it. I haven't insisted that you own one. You have one. Have one of what? Sigh. There is a variety of cars in the showrooms and the car fleet set by a majority of buyers/owners/users has nothing to with an individual's choice. Of course it does. So you're telling us that you are influenced by the choice of Jones next door. Oh well. Doh! The choice made is largely influenced by price, that is exactly why only 1% of cars are electric. The mere mention of electric has made you obsessed. I suggested electric was *an* option, not *the only* option. But you still confuse the make up of the fleet (cars that have been bought) with the choice an individual can buy. Oh look! You conveniently missed the question; Lets just answer the question. That will make a pleasant change. I'll give you some clues this time; Here is my answer again. A second car would have an effective negative tax rate. Just because you are given answers you don't like does not mean they are not answers. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Unlit cyclist attacks motorist with bicycle
On 16/04/2015 12:57, TMS320 wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote On 13/04/2015 14:59, TMS320 wrote: "The Medway Handyman" wrote On 11/04/2015 20:23, TMS320 wrote: It's very straightforward. You have a car. Designation is irrelevant. I don't have a car. I have the use of a car. I could hire a car and have the use of it, but I wouldn't own it. I haven't insisted that you own one. You have one. Have one of what? Sigh. There is a variety of cars in the showrooms and the car fleet set by a majority of buyers/owners/users has nothing to with an individual's choice. Of course it does. So you're telling us that you are influenced by the choice of Jones next door. Oh well. Doh! The choice made is largely influenced by price, that is exactly why only 1% of cars are electric. The mere mention of electric has made you obsessed. I suggested electric was *an* option, not *the only* option. But you still confuse the make up of the fleet (cars that have been bought) with the choice an individual can buy. Oh look! You conveniently missed the question; Lets just answer the question. That will make a pleasant change. I'll give you some clues this time; Here is my answer again. A second car would have an effective negative tax rate. Just because you are given answers you don't like does not mean they are not answers. It's a very good answer to a question you appear to have made up yourself. Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Unlit cyclist attacks motorist with bicycle
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
On 16/04/2015 12:57, TMS320 wrote: Here is my answer again. A second car would have an effective negative tax rate. Just because you are given answers you don't like does not mean they are not answers. It's a very good answer to a question you appear to have made up yourself. You've forgotten the original question. Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On 17/04/2015 00:28, TMS320 wrote:
Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. Nobody is jealous of cyclists. Read the research; Years of government efforts to promote cycling have had almost no impact on a sceptical population who largely view bikes as either children's toys or the preserve of Lycra-clad hobbyists, a university study has found. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their lives, certainly on a regular basis." -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
"The Medway Handyman" wrote
On 17/04/2015 00:28, TMS320 wrote: Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. Nobody is jealous of cyclists. Read the research; The issue is about tax, you idiot. There is no unfairness. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 08:33:15 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 17/04/2015 00:28, TMS320 wrote: Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. Nobody is jealous of cyclists. Read the research; Years of government efforts to promote cycling have had almost no impact on a sceptical population who largely view bikes as either children's toys or the preserve of Lycra-clad hobbyists, a university study has found. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their lives, certainly on a regular basis." How glad I am to be not "many people" I find the bicycle is a very enjoyable convenient economical viable means of transport for many things. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
"TMS320" wrote in message ... "The Medway Handyman" wrote On 17/04/2015 00:28, TMS320 wrote: Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. Nobody is jealous of cyclists. Read the research; The issue is about tax, you idiot. There is no unfairness. Psycholists SOP. When losing an argument, always revert to insults. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:50:43 +0100, Tarcap wrote:
****wits Why do people insult others? Insults can also be used as a form of control, whether it is to control another person, to control a conversation. Insulting outbursts are often used by people who are angry that their lives are out of control in other ways. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloader!
"Peter Keller" wrote in message ... On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 10:50:43 +0100, Tarcap wrote: ****wits Why do people insult others? Insults can also be used as a form of control, whether it is to control another person, to control a conversation. Insulting outbursts are often used by people who are angry that their lives are out of control in other ways. Why do you insist on calling yourself a ****wit? If you're looking to start an argument, you'll have to change the subject. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
TMS 320 finally admits that cyclists are sponging freeloaders!
On 17/04/2015 09:33, TMS320 wrote:
"The Medway Handyman" wrote On 17/04/2015 00:28, TMS320 wrote: Now answer the question I asked; Do cyclists pay any SPECIFIC EXTRA taxes to use their push bikes on the road? That's a different question to the last one. Yes, I can confirm that the government does not demand specific taxes from people that choose to use a bicycle. There is no need for jealousy - just get a bike and ride it. Nobody is jealous of cyclists. Read the research; The issue is about tax, you idiot. There is no unfairness. Who mentioned unfairness? Nobody is suggesting that cyclists being sponging freeloaders isn't fair. Just that cyclists should pay their way and stop being sponging freeloaders. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unlit cyclist attacks motorist with bicycle | Mrcheerful | UK | 251 | April 22nd 15 01:27 AM |
one unlit cyclist per minute | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 0 | November 4th 11 06:02 PM |
OT unlit cyclist dies in the middle of a very main road | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 1 | February 17th 11 04:00 PM |
He should have mown the unlit cyclist down. | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 12 | June 14th 10 12:24 PM |
Hollywood bus driver attacks cyclist, LAPD handcuffs cyclist | Matt O'Toole | General | 13 | September 29th 07 07:50 PM |