A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safe leads to'road tax' whinging



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 4th 21, 02:09 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 542
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safe leads to'road tax' whinging

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved. They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153
Ads
  #2  
Old March 4th 21, 02:56 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved. They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete sentence):

"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".
  #3  
Old March 4th 21, 05:27 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 542
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 2:09:22 PM UTC, wrote:
Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the DLVA confirmed.


Sriracha | 1667 posts | 5 hours ago
18 likes

I'm not a Twitterer, but I do like this reply to the bozo triggered by cyclists two abreast. The picture is ace:

https://cdn.road.cc/sites/default/fi...AZc0w.jpeg.jpg

g
  #4  
Old March 4th 21, 07:02 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
colwyn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the DLVA
confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which
explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers
to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to
overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to explain
that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):



"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".




Read before 168

163. Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should
● not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
● use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick
sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and
then start to move out
● not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which
is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one
vehicle
● move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you
have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back
to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in
● take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is
harder to judge speed and distance
● give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked
vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

● only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to
turn right, and there is room to do so
● stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the
queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you
may pass on the left
● give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much
room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211 to
213 and 214 to 215).
Remember: Mirrors – Signal – Manoeuvre

167. DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other
road users. For example
● approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
● where the road narrows
● when approaching a school crossing patrol
● between the kerb and a bus or tram when it is at a stop
● where traffic is queuing at junctions or road works
● when you would force another road user to swerve or slow
down
● at a level crossing
● when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the
signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait
for the signal to be cancelled
● stay behind if you are following a cyclist approaching a
roundabout or junction, and you intend to turn left
● when a tram is standing at a kerbside tram stop and there is
no clearly marked passing lane for other traffic.
  #5  
Old March 4th 21, 08:47 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 04/03/2021 07:02 pm, colwyn wrote:
On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the
DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which
explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers
to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to
overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to
explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):



"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".




Read before 168

163. Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should
● not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
● use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick
sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and
then start to move out
● not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which
is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one
vehicle
● move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you
have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back
to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in
● take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is
harder to judge speed and distance
● give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked
vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

● only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to
turn right, and there is room to do so
● stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the
queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you
may pass on the left
● give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much
room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211 to
213 and 214 to 215).
Remember: Mirrors – Signal – Manoeuvre

167. DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other
road users. For example
● approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
● where the road narrows
● when approaching a school crossing patrol
● between the kerb and a bus or tram when it is at a stop
● where traffic is queuing at junctions or road works
● when you would force another road user to swerve or slow
down
● at a level crossing
● when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the
signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait
for the signal to be cancelled
● stay behind if you are following a cyclist approaching a
roundabout or junction, and you intend to turn left
● when a tram is standing at a kerbside tram stop and there is
no clearly marked passing lane for other traffic.


Which bit of that disapplies Rule 168?
  #6  
Old March 5th 21, 08:15 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
colwyn[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 345
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 04/03/2021 20:47, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 07:02 pm, colwyn wrote:
On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the
DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman
which explains how riding single file can often make it harder for
drivers to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a
driver to overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need
me to explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):



"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".




Read before 168

163. Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should
● not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
● use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick
sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and
then start to move out
● not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which
is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one
vehicle
● move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you
have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back
to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in
● take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is
harder to judge speed and distance
● give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked
vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

● only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to
turn right, and there is room to do so
● stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the
queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you
may pass on the left
● give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much
room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211 to
213 and 214 to 215).
Remember: Mirrors – Signal – Manoeuvre

167. DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other
road users. For example
● approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
● where the road narrows
● when approaching a school crossing patrol
● between the kerb and a bus or tram when it is at a stop
● where traffic is queuing at junctions or road works
● when you would force another road user to swerve or slow
down
● at a level crossing
● when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the
signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait
for the signal to be cancelled
● stay behind if you are following a cyclist approaching a
roundabout or junction, and you intend to turn left
● when a tram is standing at a kerbside tram stop and there is
no clearly marked passing lane for other traffic.


Which bit of that disapplies Rule 168?


Don't attempt unsafe and dangerous manoeuvres !
First line of rule #163 and #167
Overtaking is NOT a given right of way.
  #7  
Old March 5th 21, 09:23 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the DLVA
confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which
explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers
to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to
overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to explain
that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):

"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".


What has that got to do with riding two abreast?
  #8  
Old March 5th 21, 10:11 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 05/03/2021 08:15 am, colwyn wrote:
On 04/03/2021 20:47, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 07:02 pm, colwyn wrote:
On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the
DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman
which explains how riding single file can often make it harder for
drivers to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a
driver to overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need
me to explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):



"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".



Read before 168

163. Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should
● not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake
● use your mirrors, signal when it is safe to do so, take a quick
sideways glance if necessary into the blind spot area and
then start to move out
● not assume that you can simply follow a vehicle ahead which
is overtaking; there may only be enough room for one
vehicle
● move quickly past the vehicle you are overtaking, once you
have started to overtake. Allow plenty of room. Move back
to the left as soon as you can but do not cut in
● take extra care at night and in poor visibility when it is
harder to judge speed and distance
● give way to oncoming vehicles before passing parked
vehicles or other obstructions on your side of the road

● only overtake on the left if the vehicle in front is signalling to
turn right, and there is room to do so
● stay in your lane if traffic is moving slowly in queues. If the
queue on your right is moving more slowly than you are, you
may pass on the left
● give motorcyclists, cyclists and horse riders at least as much
room as you would when overtaking a car (see Rules 211 to
213 and 214 to 215).
Remember: Mirrors – Signal – Manoeuvre

167. DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other
road users. For example
● approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road
● where the road narrows
● when approaching a school crossing patrol
● between the kerb and a bus or tram when it is at a stop
● where traffic is queuing at junctions or road works
● when you would force another road user to swerve or slow
down
● at a level crossing
● when a road user is indicating right, even if you believe the
signal should have been cancelled. Do not take a risk; wait
for the signal to be cancelled
● stay behind if you are following a cyclist approaching a
roundabout or junction, and you intend to turn left
● when a tram is standing at a kerbside tram stop and there is
no clearly marked passing lane for other traffic.


Which bit of that disapplies Rule 168?


Don't attempt unsafe and dangerous manoeuvres !
First line of rule #163 and #167
Overtaking is NOT a given right of way.


Which bit of that disapplies Rule 168, which is "Never obstruct a
drivers who wish to pass"?

Not: "Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass unless you feel like it".

  #9  
Old March 5th 21, 10:11 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
JNugent[_13_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 250
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On 05/03/2021 09:23 am, TMS320 wrote:
On 04/03/2021 14:56, JNugent wrote:
On 04/03/2021 02:09 pm, wrote:

Usual ignorant rants about a tax that was scrapped in 1937 as the
DLVA confirmed.

Road Policing Scotland took to Twitter to explain to motorists that
cycling two abreast is both legal and safer for everyone involved.
They linked a video (link is external) featuring Chris Boardman which
explains how riding single file can often make it harder for drivers
to pass. Single file means a longer line of cyclists for a driver to
overtake. If you're on this site you probably don't need me to
explain that...

However, not everyone saw the point of the educational video and
instead took the opportunity to give the tired road tax comments
another outing

https://road.cc/content/news/cycling...log-item-23153


Highway Code. Rule 168.

It applies to you.

Read it and obey it - especially the bit that says (as a discrete
sentence):

"Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass".


What has that got to do with riding two abreast?


Obstruction. It can take many forms.
  #10  
Old March 5th 21, 11:28 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 542
Default Traffic cops confirming riding two abreast is legal and safeleads to 'road tax' whinging

On Thursday, March 4, 2021 at 7:02:33 PM UTC, colwyn wrote:

163. Overtake only when it is safe and legal to do so. You should
● not get too close to the vehicle you intend to overtake


That just about covers the whole subject in two sentences.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Riding two abreast barry taylor Australia 15 August 14th 07 03:43 AM
Traffic Citations & Traffic Cops Freddie Mountain Biking 0 March 23rd 06 05:02 AM
Riding two abreast can be legal? mkli Australia 14 February 24th 06 12:30 AM
Riding two abreast can be legal? adam85 Australia 3 February 21st 06 08:00 AM
Riding on Road 2 Abreast Jason Australia 14 January 29th 04 10:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.