Child mown down by high speed pavement motorist

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 14:41:02 UTC+1, Bertie Wooster wrote:
And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.



http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html

Noptjustthisdecade,thisyear,thismonthandmyspacebar isnotworking.....Hmmmmm

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:34:48 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/07/2013 15:33, wrote:

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:23:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 14:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:



And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.



http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html



QUOTE:



The collision involved a Ford Fiesta, which was being driven by a

75-year-old man. The driver has been taken to an east London hospital,

and is in a stable condition.

ENDQUOTE



You missed that bit out, for some reason.



And your point is...?



The *reason* for the collision........At.least.they.did.not.say,.Driven .by.a.male.


I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder.

On 21/07/2013 18:28, Squashme wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 5:56:57 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/07/2013 15:47, wrote:

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:34:48 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 15:33, wrote:



On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:23:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:



On 21/07/2013 14:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:



And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.



http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html







QUOTE:



The collision involved a Ford Fiesta, which was being driven by a

75-year-old man. The driver has been taken to an east London hospital,

and is in a stable condition.

ENDQUOTE





You missed that bit out, for some reason.



And your point is...?



The *reason* for the collision.



I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder.



Where did anyone claim it was deliberate?



Why do you ask that?

Why do you write "I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder."?

In order to communicate the fact expounded in that sentence.

On 21/07/2013 20:29, Tosspot wrote:
On 21/07/13 16:47, wrote:
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:34:48 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/07/2013 15:33, wrote:

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:23:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 14:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:

And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html




QUOTE:

The collision involved a Ford Fiesta, which was being driven by a
75-year-old man. The driver has been taken to an east London hospital,
and is in a stable condition.
ENDQUOTE


You missed that bit out, for some reason.

And your point is...?

The *reason* for the collision.

I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder.

Where did anyone claim it was deliberate?


Half cocked or what?

peers at quote Ooops, sorry, nobody mentioned the driver was OK. Good
point, well presented.

The reason why no-one mentioned it is that it isn't true.

He is, according to the report, in a hospital and in what is described
as "a stable condition".

That might mean he was injured in the accident. It might, given the
circumstances, mean that he was suddenly taken ill and that this was a
major contributory factor in the incident. People don't just suddenly
veer off the carriageway onto the footway for no reason.

It might mean both things.

JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 18:28, Squashme wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 5:56:57 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/07/2013 15:47, wrote:

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:34:48 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 15:33, wrote:



On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:23:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:



On 21/07/2013 14:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:



And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.



http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html







QUOTE:



The collision involved a Ford Fiesta, which was being driven by a

75-year-old man. The driver has been taken to an east London hospital,

and is in a stable condition.

ENDQUOTE





You missed that bit out, for some reason.



And your point is...?



The *reason* for the collision.



I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder.



Where did anyone claim it was deliberate?



Why do you ask that?

Why do you write "I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder."?

In order to communicate the fact expounded in that sentence.

I'm afraid that is a "whoosh!" for me, then. I do not understand how
anyone would make such an accusation as a possibility, let alone a
fact.

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:07:02 +0100, Judith wrote:

Wooster is a ******.

Why do people insult others?

People who are angry insult people because in their anger they cannot
think of a better way to handle it, except to start a fight and make the
other person feel bad. People who insult can feel backed in, threatened
and fearful, making them lash out because they know no other way to
handle themselves in every situation or conversation.

On 21/07/2013 21:45, Alexis wrote:
JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 18:28, Squashme wrote:
On Sunday, July 21, 2013 5:56:57 PM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
On 21/07/2013 15:47, wrote:

On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:34:48 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

On 21/07/2013 15:33, wrote:



On Sunday, 21 July 2013 15:23:19 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:



On 21/07/2013 14:41, Bertie Wooster wrote:



And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.



http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html







QUOTE:



The collision involved a Ford Fiesta, which was being driven by a

75-year-old man. The driver has been taken to an east London hospital,

and is in a stable condition.

ENDQUOTE





You missed that bit out, for some reason.



And your point is...?



The *reason* for the collision.



I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder.



Where did anyone claim it was deliberate?



Why do you ask that?

Why do you write "I know you'd rather believe it was an attempt at murder."?

In order to communicate the fact expounded in that sentence.

I'm afraid that is a "whoosh!" for me, then. I do not understand how
anyone would make such an accusation as a possibility, let alone a
fact.

In that case, you have not read many of the other poster's previous posts.

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 20:53:04 +0000 (UTC), Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:07:02 +0100, Judith wrote:

Wooster is a ******.

Why do people insult others?

People who are angry insult people because in their anger they cannot
think of a better way to handle it, except to start a fight and make the
other person feel bad. People who insult can feel backed in, threatened
and fearful, making them lash out because they know no other way to
handle themselves in every situation or conversation.


Thanks for the times 2 reference.

(make it three)

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 19:41:14 +0100, Rob Morley wrote:

snip


Did this http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-22621623 get
mentioned here already? I don't recall seeing it, but not much gets
past my killfile.


I think there may have been a minor wankcry.

My thoughts were with the families.

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 16:53:35 +0100, "Mrcheerful"
wrote:

wrote:
On Sunday, 21 July 2013 14:41:02 UTC+1, Bertie Wooster wrote:
And worse than that - the 9 year old boy is left fatherless.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...l-8713187.html

I await Mr C's comments with interest.

How many cyclists were involved?

Up to three. Some of the emergency services attending the scene may
also have been cyclists.

Why do you ask?

Because they may also have been Satanists. Did you also post this on a
Satanist group?