Money well spent!

"sober" wrote in message news
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:12:22 +0100, Brian Robertson
wrote:

On 13/08/2013 18:56, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"John Benn" wrote in message
...
"JNugent" wrote in message
...

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Psycholists think so. But then they would, wouldn't they? That's
what you get from a religion.

Maybe we should listen, apparently they earn more than the rest of us,
and are healthier than the rest of us.

Funny, I've never seen a match-fit multi-millionaire footballer turn up
for training or go shopping on a bike. The only rich and healthy sports
people I've ever seen on bikes are the ones who *have* to ride them.

What a complete prick you are!

Hello Glug

Yeah but he has the ability to wind up ****s like you

Psycholists SOP. When losing an argument, always revert to insults.

On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:26:35 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Cycling is the only form of exercise which also accomplishes a practical need, i.e. transport. *

* Apart from walking, which is too slow for journeys of more than a couple of miles and running, which is impractical for carrying anything.

On 14/08/2013 08:39, wrote:

On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:26:35 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Cycling is the only form of exercise which also accomplishes a practical need, i.e. transport. *
* Apart from walking, which is too slow for journeys of more than a couple of miles and running, which is impractical for carrying anything.

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

On 13/08/2013 22:00, JNugent wrote:
On 13/08/2013 20:12, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 13/08/2013 18:56, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"John Benn" wrote in message
...
"JNugent" wrote in message
...

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Psycholists think so. But then they would, wouldn't they? That's
what you get from a religion.

Maybe we should listen, apparently they earn more than the rest of us,
and are healthier than the rest of us.

Funny, I've never seen a match-fit multi-millionaire footballer turn up
for training or go shopping on a bike. The only rich and healthy sports
people I've ever seen on bikes are the ones who *have* to ride them.

What a complete prick you are!

That must be the wittiest and most adult response ever made on usenet.

or something.


Surely surpassed by many a petrol head saying that speeding doesn't kill.

On 14/08/2013 00:02, sober wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:12:22 +0100, Brian Robertson wrote:

On 13/08/2013 18:56, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"John Benn" wrote in message
...
"JNugent" wrote in message
...

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Psycholists think so. But then they would, wouldn't they? That's
what you get from a religion.

Maybe we should listen, apparently they earn more than the rest of us,
and are healthier than the rest of us.

Funny, I've never seen a match-fit multi-millionaire footballer turn up
for training or go shopping on a bike. The only rich and healthy sports
people I've ever seen on bikes are the ones who *have* to ride them.

What a complete prick you are!

Hello Glug

Yeah but he has the ability to wind up ****s like you


Oh God, please stop my sides aching. Your name is SO funny.

On 14/08/2013 08:39, wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:26:35 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Cycling is the only form of exercise which also accomplishes a practical need, i.e. transport. *

* Apart from walking, which is too slow for journeys of more than a couple of miles and running, which is impractical for carrying anything.


Well, according to one prick on here not so long back, cycling is not a
workable form of transport. He seemed to suggest that you couldn't live
with only a bike for transport. Strange, but I seem to have lived for
many a long year with only a bike for transport.

On 14/08/2013 23:12, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 13/08/2013 22:00, JNugent wrote:
On 13/08/2013 20:12, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 13/08/2013 18:56, Mentalguy2k8 wrote:

"John Benn" wrote in message
...
"JNugent" wrote in message
...

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Psycholists think so. But then they would, wouldn't they? That's
what you get from a religion.

Maybe we should listen, apparently they earn more than the rest of us,
and are healthier than the rest of us.

Funny, I've never seen a match-fit multi-millionaire footballer turn up
for training or go shopping on a bike. The only rich and healthy sports
people I've ever seen on bikes are the ones who *have* to ride them.

What a complete prick you are!

That must be the wittiest and most adult response ever made on usenet.

or something.


Surely surpassed by many a petrol head saying that speeding doesn't kill.

Nah.

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:15:39 PM UTC+1, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 14/08/2013 08:39, wrote:

On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:26:35 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:



Is cycling the only known form of exercise?



Cycling is the only form of exercise which also accomplishes a practical need, i.e. transport. *



* Apart from walking, which is too slow for journeys of more than a couple of miles and running, which is impractical for carrying anything.





Well, according to one prick on here not so long back, cycling is not a

workable form of transport. He seemed to suggest that you couldn't live

with only a bike for transport. Strange, but I seem to have lived for

many a long year with only a bike for transport.

You're probably scared to travel by train as the driver might be drunk.

On 15/08/2013 00:43, Phil W Lee wrote:

"John Benn" :
"JNugent" wrote:

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

Psycholists think so. But then they would, wouldn't they? That's what you
get from a religion.

What other form of exercise saves you time and money instead of
costing either one or the other?

Is cycling the only known form of exercise?

On 14/08/2013 23:47, Paul Clarke wrote:
On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 11:15:39 PM UTC+1, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 14/08/2013 08:39, wrote:

On Tuesday, 13 August 2013 17:26:35 UTC+1, JNugent wrote:



Is cycling the only known form of exercise?



Cycling is the only form of exercise which also accomplishes a practical need, i.e. transport. *



* Apart from walking, which is too slow for journeys of more than a couple of miles and running, which is impractical for carrying anything.





Well, according to one prick on here not so long back, cycling is not a

workable form of transport. He seemed to suggest that you couldn't live

with only a bike for transport. Strange, but I seem to have lived for

many a long year with only a bike for transport.

You're probably scared to travel by train as the driver might be drunk.


Naaaah. No fun in that job these days.