|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
the wrongings of Society and the rightings of man through knowledge.
On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 12:56:22 UTC+1, thirty-six wrote:
On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 11:55:25 UTC+1, Partac wrote: You obviously know that from first hand experience. amazingly we have a language (in common use, but not of the commoner) which has been so corrupted that slight differences in the placement of letters on the page have totally opposite meanings. I believe (and I am wary of the dangers) that some thought has gone into making the commoner obviously oblyvious to the techniques of textural conJury. For the purpose of Society it IS necessary to train the minds of common men and women to ignore that which is texturally obvious. Oops, should have said, Plain to see. Why use obfuscation when simple words show the meaning and truth. I ask my-self, Is there good reason to choose not to be literate? It is best to know what words have straight meaning than to stand-under those that one does not know of their truth. It is that Schooling is required, to read without knowing, for Society's gain. The keystone to the heir-arch-y (note architecture and (free)masonry)) is to fill with under-standing so there is no place for knowledge. The ledge for knowns should not be filled with nonsense, yet this is what is allowed as Society rules over the common man. The common man has historically lost out to Society, as Society has stolen the lives and labours of the common man, all in full view, but only comprehensible by those who have escaped Societal organised shooling, or have chosen to ignore the non-sense and eventually see the bindings of books ARE all that binds man to the legal NON-SENSE. Do you understand or do you know? Use your knowse! |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On Wednesday, 21 August 2013 12:56:37 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote:
On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. your perception is skewed from the reality of men. Please go and crawl back under your rock. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On 21/08/2013 11:38, JNugent wrote:
On 21/08/2013 08:55, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 Which all goes to convince me even more that a camera on my crash helmet is an essential tool that every cyclist should have. Such behaviour by car drivers should lead, inevitably, to prosecution and a substantial ban. A disqualification from driving for a physical assault with the fists? Would you extend it to all crimes, or just those alleged to have been committed against cyclists? Would you, for instance, impose a "substantial ban" (from driving) for criminal damage committed by someone damaging a car with a cycle-lock? Or by hurling a bicycle onto a vehicle's bonnet? And if not, why not? Probably just those where a motorist has used his vehicle as a deadly weapon in a deliberate manner. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On 21/08/2013 12:56, Mrcheerful wrote:
On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. And car drivers always tell the truth, huh? I am reminded of a woman I worked with who used to cycle from Buxton to Stockport every single day, rain, snow or shine. Until one day someone drove into her and ruined her health for the rest of her days. She was going through a green light and the car driver crashed a red. Needless to say, that wasn't the tale that the car driver gave to the police. Guess who the police believed. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
"Mrcheerful" wrote in message
... Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I strongly suspect that there is information missing from that story. Nobody reacts that way to someone just shaking his head. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
wrote in message
... On Tuesday, 20 August 2013 19:43:10 UTC+1, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 Thank you for your crackpot interpretation of this news report, psychiatric help is available. Are you going to volunteer to be a witness? Psycholists stick together remember. You all follow the same religion. You are all one. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:53:09 +0100, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 21/08/2013 12:56, Mrcheerful wrote: On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. And car drivers always tell the truth, huh? I am reminded of a woman I worked with who used to cycle from Buxton to Stockport every single day, rain, snow or shine. Until one day someone drove into her and ruined her health for the rest of her days. She was going through a green light and the car driver crashed a red. Needless to say, that wasn't the tale that the car driver gave to the police. Guess who the police believed. I wonder if the people who knew the car driver believed his story over the woman's. Did she tell you the true story - or was if from an independent witness. Glug, glug. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On 21/08/2013 21:53, Brian Robertson wrote:
On 21/08/2013 12:56, Mrcheerful wrote: On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. And car drivers always tell the truth, huh? I am reminded of a woman I worked with who used to cycle from Buxton to Stockport every single day, rain, snow or shine. Until one day someone drove into her and ruined her health for the rest of her days. She was going through a green light and the car driver crashed a red. Needless to say, that wasn't the tale that the car driver gave to the police. Guess who the police believed. the one that was most likely/provably telling the truth |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclist hunts for witnesses
On 21/08/2013 22:16, Judith wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:53:09 +0100, Brian Robertson wrote: On 21/08/2013 12:56, Mrcheerful wrote: On 21/08/2013 10:23, Brian Robertson wrote: On 20/08/2013 19:43, Mrcheerful wrote: Cyclist just manages to stop before running into the back of a Range Rover and is surprised that the owner takes exception to the cyclist's antics. Cyclist claims he was knocked off and wants to drum up some witnesses. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-23757876 I take it that you think knocking a cyclist off his bike and possibly causing him/her serious injury or death is a reasoned response? if it happened then it is unreasonable. I have noticed that cyclists are seasoned liars and will even invent crashes and crimes to cover their own stupidity. And car drivers always tell the truth, huh? I am reminded of a woman I worked with who used to cycle from Buxton to Stockport every single day, rain, snow or shine. Until one day someone drove into her and ruined her health for the rest of her days. She was going through a green light and the car driver crashed a red. Needless to say, that wasn't the tale that the car driver gave to the police. Guess who the police believed. I wonder if the people who knew the car driver believed his story over the woman's. Did she tell you the true story - or was if from an independent witness. Glug, glug. Jimdeth, since motorists commonly leave cyclists for dead in the gutter I would tend to believe the cyclist. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Compo witnesses needed | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 113 | January 13th 13 11:19 PM |
Any witnesses - Yet another hit and run by a motorist. OAP left witha broken leg and knee. | Squashme | UK | 14 | July 14th 10 11:01 PM |
ANY WITNESSES? Hip Injury in Reading as Cyclist Collides with OAP | David Green[_5_] | UK | 7 | July 13th 10 02:22 PM |
Independant witnesses.... | [email protected] | UK | 10 | August 29th 06 12:07 PM |
Dick Pound Witnesses Huge Flash Of Light!!!!! | Calogero Carlucci | Racing | 0 | July 4th 06 05:43 AM |