Meanwhile back in the real world of hit and runs

On 19/08/2012 18:50, Mr Pounder wrote:
"Tosspot" wrote in message
...
On 19/08/12 18:50, Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ated-1-4849034

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Yes, but they were Muzzers so who cares? The real question is, who in
their right mind, would drive a silver Mark IV Astra?

What a terrible to say about two less jungle bunnies.






****

"Jason" wrote in message
news:50324f4c$0$3603$7120d902@karibu...
On 19/08/2012 18:50, Mr Pounder wrote:
"Tosspot" wrote in message
...
On 19/08/12 18:50, Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ated-1-4849034

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Yes, but they were Muzzers so who cares? The real question is, who in
their right mind, would drive a silver Mark IV Astra?

What a terrible to say about two less jungle bunnies.


****

You missed the word racist out.

On Aug 20, 1:56*pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi....

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

BTW, are you a motorist?

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.


Is it like ozone, i.e. more than one type?

BTW, are you a motorist?

Yes, lucky I'm not an anarchist as well, otherwise I would drive wherever I
liked, pavements for example.


--
ennemm

Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

BTW, are you a motorist?

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader'

On 20/08/2012 07:24, Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

You are Wolfie Smith AICMFP.

Power to the People!

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."

On 21/08/2012 07:31, Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

BTW, are you a motorist?


Are you a member of the Tooting Liberation Front?

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."

On Aug 21, 8:10*am, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

Is it like ozone, i.e. more than one type?

What is it about 'many forms' you do not understand?

BTW, are you a motorist?

Yes, lucky I'm not an anarchist as well, otherwise I would drive wherever I
liked, pavements for example.

You still don't understand anarchism at all do you and the fact that
you are a motorist explains a lot about your stance in this thread..

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

On Aug 21, 9:34*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

BTW, are you a motorist?


anarchy has only one form: 'without a leader'

That is like saying democracy only has one form: 'mob rule'.

"...In the German uprising known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic the
anarchists Gustav Landauer, Silvio Gesell and Erich Mühsam had
important leadership positions within the revolutionary councilist
structures..."

And thank you for revealing your own dismal ignorance of the subject
of anarchy.

"...There are many types and traditions of anarchism, not all of which
are mutually exclusive.[13] Anarchist schools of thought can differ
fundamentally, supporting anything from extreme individualism to
complete collectivism..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchism

-- .
A driving licence is sometimes a licence to kill.

"Dave - Cyclists VOR" wrote in message
...
On 21/08/2012 07:31, Doug wrote:
On Aug 20, 1:56 pm, nik.morgan wrote:
Doug wrote:
On Aug 19, 6:32 pm, Judith wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 09:50:37 -0700 (PDT), Squashme
wrote:

http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/...ction/leeds-hi...

"West Yorkshire Police said the driver slowed down to see what had
happened, then sped away from the scene."

Sorry - who was it on the cycle?

This clearly demonstrates how motorists are much more dangerous than
cyclists and it indicates why there is a need for greater legal
constraints on motorists than on cyclists.

How can you be calling for legal constraints, you claimed to be an
anarchist?

You obviously know little about anarchism and its many forms and you
are probably guided by the popular view of it alone.

BTW, are you a motorist?


Are you a member of the Tooting Liberation Front?

Catford Liberation Front more like. Power to the proletariat!