Effectiveness of Justin, Squashme and Simon (none)

On 17/02/2013 19:36, Alex wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote:

Doug wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:44:36 AM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:
Doug wrote:

On Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:33:25 AM UTC, Doug wrote:

.



Motorists kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill motorists.



Smithx



apart from when they do, by their own stupidity cause an accident
which

kills someone else, such as a car driver:

http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/n...clist-1-130248

There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the
motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad
driving, most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying
proper attention, as usual.

Smithx.

the cyclist was unlit at night, in order to spare the cyclist's life the car
driver had to make the unpleasant decision to hit another car. I would have
hit the cyclist.

Cheerful | adjective 1. full of cheer ; in good spirits : a cheerful
person. 2. promoting or inducing cheer ...

He does that for me.


--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:41:35 PM UTC, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 17/02/2013 14:32, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote:

On 17/02/2013 13:48, Doug wrote:





There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the

motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad driving,

most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying proper

attention, as usual.



Smithx.



Is that why cyclists get 'doored'?



The get doored ‘cos they ride in the door zone.

Wrong. They get doored because motorists open their doors without looking. Sometimes the only space cyclists have left, on our narrow overcrowded roads, is the door zone, with cars parked nose to tail on both sides of the road.

Smithx

On Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:38:42 PM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:
Doug wrote:

On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:44:36 AM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Doug wrote:



On Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:33:25 AM UTC, Doug wrote:



.







Motorists kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill motorists.







Smithx







apart from when they do, by their own stupidity cause an accident

which



kills someone else, such as a car driver:



http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/n...clist-1-130248



There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the

motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad

driving, most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying

proper attention, as usual.



Smithx.



the cyclist was unlit at night, in order to spare the cyclist's life the car

driver had to make the unpleasant decision to hit another car. I would have

hit the cyclist.

Pedestrians are unlit at night. What do you think headlamps are for? I suppose you will now come up with all sorts of nitpicky examples where you claim cyclists kill motorists, despite the vast majority where motorists kill cyclists and cyclists are unable to kill motorists.

Smithx.

Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote:

On 17/02/2013 19:36, Alex wrote:
"Mrcheerful" wrote:

Doug wrote:
On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:44:36 AM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:
Doug wrote:

On Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:33:25 AM UTC, Doug wrote:

.



Motorists kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill motorists.



Smithx



apart from when they do, by their own stupidity cause an accident
which

kills someone else, such as a car driver:

http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/n...clist-1-130248

There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the
motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad
driving, most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying
proper attention, as usual.

Smithx.

the cyclist was unlit at night, in order to spare the cyclist's life the car
driver had to make the unpleasant decision to hit another car. I would have
hit the cyclist.

Cheerful | adjective 1. full of cheer ; in good spirits : a cheerful
person. 2. promoting or inducing cheer ...

He does that for me.

"Ooh, he's here again,
The man with the child in his eyes."

There is something about this place that is overwhelmingly reminiscent
of Daisy Chains Nursery Group - if only we had a nice song that we
could all join in with, all the words and all the actions...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2FI3p79Jq-k

Doug wrote:
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 4:38:42 PM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:
Doug wrote:

On Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:44:36 AM UTC, Mrcheerful wrote:

Doug wrote:



On Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:33:25 AM UTC, Doug wrote:



.







Motorists kill cyclists but cyclists do not kill motorists.







Smithx







apart from when they do, by their own stupidity cause an accident

which



kills someone else, such as a car driver:



http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/n...clist-1-130248



There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the

motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad

driving, most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying

proper attention, as usual.



Smithx.



the cyclist was unlit at night, in order to spare the cyclist's life
the car

driver had to make the unpleasant decision to hit another car. I
would have

hit the cyclist.

Pedestrians are unlit at night. What do you think headlamps are for?
I suppose you will now come up with all sorts of nitpicky examples
where you claim cyclists kill motorists, despite the vast majority
where motorists kill cyclists and cyclists are unable to kill
motorists.

Smithx.

A pedestrian should be facing oncoming traffic to increase visibility and so
they can jump to the side if needed. an unlit cyclist wobbling about in the
dark on the left is a very different proposition.

Since cyclists are so very vulnerable to everything, it would be a good idea
if they took more care of themselves rather than rely on everyone else to do
it for them.

On 18/02/2013 09:42, Doug wrote:
On Sunday, February 17, 2013 2:41:35 PM UTC, Simon Weissel wrote:
On 17/02/2013 14:32, Dave- Cyclists VORC wrote:

On 17/02/2013 13:48, Doug wrote:





There is no such thing as an 'accident'. They are all RTCs. If the

motorist can't avoid the cyclist then it is just a case of bad driving,

most likely going too fast for the conditions or not paying proper

attention, as usual.



Smithx.



Is that why cyclists get 'doored'?



The get doored ‘cos they ride in the door zone.

Wrong. They get doored because motorists open their doors without looking. Sometimes the only space cyclists have left, on our narrow overcrowded roads, is the door zone, with cars parked nose to tail on both sides of the road.

Smithx

So why don't cars get 'doored' when passing closer & faster?

--
Dave - Cyclists VORC
Bicycles are for Children. Like masturbation, something you should grow
out of.
There is something seriously sick and stunted about grown men who want
to ride a bike."

On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:48:15 -0600, nik.morgan wrote:



"Do you have have some bananas" . No, I ain't got none.


As regards Justipoo's : I think he is bananas