|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"Phil W Lee" wrote in message ... colwyn considered Sat, 16 May 2015 14:40:07 +0100 the perfect time to write: On 16/05/2015 14:15, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But that is all part of that particular job. Sitting in an office (or similar environment) next to someone smelling like a wildebeest is definitely not. It was you who generalised - anyone suffering body odour has a problem, not necessarily a bicycle. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. I've heard that bull**** before on this NG. I didn't believe it then, and I certainly don't now. It could be that you don't smell your own stink, in the same way that a skunk doesn't find his own smell offensive, perhaps? Just open your eyes and do some research! As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. Do you have a cite for that, or did you just make it up? I said "AS A GUESS" It's uncomfortable sitting in wet/damp clothes Not only that, but most regular cyclists would soon learn that poor personal cleanliness combined with exercise equals skin problems. Of course, the sedentary people in their cars think they can get away with staying dirty, and don't believe they stink as a result. They just turn up the air conditioning. And stay cool and fresh, with pollutants and grime trapped in their pollen filters,as opposed to cyclists who arrive smelly, sweaty and grimy. By the way sweat does NOT smell! As I thought, you are oblivious to your own stench. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx SWEAT DOES NOT SMELL - Just look it up , don't think! http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx Now what on earth leads you to believe that the failed AI (artificial ignorance, in this case) program you are responding to has any capability for thought? Does that little paragraph actually mean anything, or have you just strung together some random words in the vain hope of appearing intelligent? Here's a tip - it didn't work. Hope this helps. (Researchers found barely half of British adults always wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet. And a quarter of workers claim to be too rushed to wash and dry their hands properly after nipping to the loo. A morning shower is regularly skipped by 58 per cent of men, with a quarter admitting they would rather have the extra time in bed. One in three said they simply couldn’t be bothered.) And quite a few compound the issue by pedalling to work on a bike, without even showering then! If there are only 2% of people cycling the other 56% regularly skipping on Hygiene could either be you or the next person you shake hands with. |
Ads |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"Phil W Lee" wrote in message ... Bod considered Sat, 16 May 2015 17:14:16 +0100 the perfect time to write: On 16/05/2015 17:10, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. By the way sweat does NOT smell! That is one of the stupidest things I have read for a very long time. Really? He is technically correct. Sweat on its own does not smell. It's the bacteria. So the only people who's sweat smells are the dirty ones. Strangely, it's the non-cyclists who seem to be so convinced that sweat smells, so I think we have all the evidence needed to reach a conclusion. That's my point entirely. Cyclists *think* they don't stink, and are so obstinate they won't listen when others are trying to help by pointing out that they are very wrong. As in this case, again. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 20:45, Phil W Lee wrote:
Not only that, but most regular cyclists would soon learn that poor personal cleanliness combined with exercise equals skin problems. Then why don't they? Cyclists are smelly, spotty oiks. Of course, the sedentary people in their cars think they can get away with staying dirty, and don't believe they stink as a result. They just turn up the air conditioning. What leads you to believe that motorists are smelly? Since their faster form of transport means shorter journey times, they have ample time to shower - and if they are sedentary they won't break into a sweat.. Now what on earth leads you to believe that the failed AI (artificial ignorance, in this case) program you are responding to has any capability for thought? This is a classic ****** Lee post. It has everything. Made up facts, ill conceived & unsupportable opinions and finally an ad hominem attack when he has no rational argument. Classic! No sugar in my Latte M'Lud. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 20:49, The Idiot Phil W Lee wrote:
So the only people who's sweat smells are the dirty ones. Strangely, it's the non-cyclists who seem to be so convinced that sweat smells, so I think we have all the evidence needed to reach a conclusion. We have indeed reached a conclusion M'Lud. It is indeed non cyclists who believe that cyclists smell. Because they smell. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Sat, 16 May 2015 11:56:19 +0100, JNugent wrote:
On 15/05/2015 12:21, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:41 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right. Suit yourself. I have absolutely no desire to be like you. You and lots of others, I'd say. The majority of the population are thick. You are welcome to join them. -- Three guys go to a ski lodge, and there aren't enough rooms, so they have to share a bed. In the middle of the night, the guy on the right wakes up and says, "I had this wild, vivid dream of getting a hand job!" The guy on the left wakes up, and unbelievably, he's had the same dream, too. Then the guy in the middle wakes up and says, "That's funny, I dreamt I was skiing!" |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. -- Why do men die before their wives? They want to. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 22:24, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 16/05/2015 20:49, The Idiot Phil W Lee wrote: So the only people who's sweat smells are the dirty ones. Strangely, it's the non-cyclists who seem to be so convinced that sweat smells, so I think we have all the evidence needed to reach a conclusion. We have indeed reached a conclusion M'Lud. It is indeed non cyclists who believe that cyclists smell. Because they smell. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-clothing.html |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:24:03 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 16/05/2015 20:49, The Idiot Phil W Lee wrote: So the only people who's sweat smells are the dirty ones. Strangely, it's the non-cyclists who seem to be so convinced that sweat smells, so I think we have all the evidence needed to reach a conclusion. We have indeed reached a conclusion M'Lud. It is indeed non cyclists who believe that cyclists smell. Because they smell. The non-bicyclists? |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside of your car looks better. -- You can get by on good looks and charm for about fifteen minutes. After that, you'd better have a big dick or nice tits. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclists causing pollution. | Dave-Cyclists VORT | UK | 0 | January 26th 14 08:01 PM |
Reckless cyclists causing trouble in Catford | Mr Benn[_5_] | UK | 6 | March 10th 12 04:41 AM |
Cyclists causing traffic delays | Mr. Benn[_9_] | UK | 66 | March 9th 12 09:33 AM |
Yet another place where cyclists are causing problems. | PeterG | UK | 114 | July 16th 10 05:47 PM |
Duh's greenhouse effect to proceed when medical certificate is inhand | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 3 | December 16th 09 11:54 PM |