A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cyclists causing greenhouse effect



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old May 18th 15, 10:01 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd
have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in
their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys
fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.


You are entitled to your opinion.


A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside
of your car looks better.


What car?
Ads
  #102  
Old May 18th 15, 03:57 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tough Guy no. 1265
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,733
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd
have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in
their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys
fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.


A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside
of your car looks better.


What car?


Any car beats a city.

--
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic -- Arthur C Clarke
  #103  
Old May 18th 15, 09:01 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect


"The Medway Handyman" wrote

Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.


But a car seat would interfere with pedalling action and make the bike very
heavy.




  #104  
Old May 18th 15, 10:22 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tough Guy no. 1265
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,733
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:16:51 +0100, bm wrote:


"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:25:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration. Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top
Gear were forced to acknowledge.

He is so arrogant as to think that his opinions must be establiched
facts.


I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right.


Yea?
LMFAO
You silly PHucker.


Says the guy named after a biscuit.

--
A woman walks into a drugstore and asks the pharmacist if he sells size extra large condoms.
He replies, "Yes we do. Would you like to buy some?"
She responds, "No, but do you mind if I wait around here until someone does?
  #105  
Old May 18th 15, 10:23 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tough Guy no. 1265
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,733
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens,
unless you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those
alien growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more
convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not
opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not
objective facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control
your opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances. How
do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?


What do you sit on to watch TV?


What does that have to do with transport choices?


It shows the most comfy form of seating.

PS Most TV is shi*t.


Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is.

--
A woman walks into a drugstore and asks the pharmacist if he sells size extra large condoms.
He replies, "Yes we do. Would you like to buy some?"
She responds, "No, but do you mind if I wait around here until someone does?
  #106  
Old May 19th 15, 12:23 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tarcap
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,950
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect



"TMS320" wrote in message ...


"The Medway Handyman" wrote

Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.


But a car seat would interfere with pedalling action and make the bike very
heavy.

Yes it would. Best to do away with the bicycle and attach the chair to
something more sensible. Like a car.



  #107  
Old May 19th 15, 10:08 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or
we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more
comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair
in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys
fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The
inside of your car looks better.


What car?


Any car beats a city.


Not relevant in my case.
  #108  
Old May 19th 15, 10:10 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Mon, 18 May 2015 22:23:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have
access to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens,
unless you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh
air while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those
alien growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from
you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more
convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not
opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not
objective facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster". I
do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control
your opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances.
How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?

What do you sit on to watch TV?


What does that have to do with transport choices?


It shows the most comfy form of seating.

PS Most TV is shi*t.


Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is.


So I would go to a chair with no TV. Like a bicycle seat.
  #109  
Old May 19th 15, 05:00 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tough Guy no. 1265
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,733
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:10:06 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 22:23:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have
access to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens,
unless you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh
air while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those
alien growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from
you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more
convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not
opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not
objective facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster". I
do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control
your opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances.
How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?

What do you sit on to watch TV?

What does that have to do with transport choices?


It shows the most comfy form of seating.

PS Most TV is shi*t.


Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is.


So I would go to a chair with no TV. Like a bicycle seat.


You would sit in your living room and read a book on a bicycle seat?

--
Peter is listening to "The Shadows - Sleepwalk"
  #110  
Old May 19th 15, 05:01 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Tough Guy no. 1265
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,733
Default Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or
we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more
comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair
in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys
fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The
inside of your car looks better.

What car?


Any car beats a city.


Not relevant in my case.


You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

--
In 1272, the Arabic Muslims invented the condom, using a goat's lower intestine.
In 1873, the British refined the idea by taking the intestine out of the goat first.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cyclists causing pollution. Dave-Cyclists VORT UK 0 January 26th 14 09:01 PM
Reckless cyclists causing trouble in Catford Mr Benn[_5_] UK 6 March 10th 12 05:41 AM
Cyclists causing traffic delays Mr. Benn[_9_] UK 66 March 9th 12 10:33 AM
Yet another place where cyclists are causing problems. PeterG UK 114 July 16th 10 05:47 PM
Duh's greenhouse effect to proceed when medical certificate is inhand Andre Jute[_2_] Techniques 3 December 17th 09 12:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.