|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside of your car looks better. What car? |
Ads |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside of your car looks better. What car? Any car beats a city. -- Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic -- Arthur C Clarke |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"The Medway Handyman" wrote Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You probably qualify on both grounds. But a car seat would interfere with pedalling action and make the bike very heavy. |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Fri, 15 May 2015 01:16:51 +0100, bm wrote:
"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message news On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:25:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote: "Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100 the perfect time to write: On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a car. Well I don't, for many purposes. Like? Carrying small things Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Visiting Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Going where there are no parks. I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you live in one of those silly congested cities. Breathing fresh air off the countryside. I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while you travel, open the car window. Air in hair. Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien growth cycle helmets. Lots of things. That is all I am going to say. I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around. And I am not dictating how you should get around. you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with different preferences, can you? Heil Hitler! I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions. More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under consideration. Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top Gear were forced to acknowledge. He is so arrogant as to think that his opinions must be establiched facts. I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right. Yea? LMFAO You silly PHucker. Says the guy named after a biscuit. -- A woman walks into a drugstore and asks the pharmacist if he sells size extra large condoms. He replies, "Yes we do. Would you like to buy some?" She responds, "No, but do you mind if I wait around here until someone does? |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a car. Well I don't, for many purposes. Like? Carrying small things Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Visiting Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Going where there are no parks. I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you live in one of those silly congested cities. Breathing fresh air off the countryside. I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while you travel, open the car window. Air in hair. Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien growth cycle helmets. Lots of things. That is all I am going to say. I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around. And I am not dictating how you should get around. you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with different preferences, can you? Heil Hitler! I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions. Those are your opinions. My opinions are different. "comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective facts. I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler. The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster". I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your opinions. Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for anyone. That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances. How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it? What do you sit on to watch TV? What does that have to do with transport choices? It shows the most comfy form of seating. PS Most TV is shi*t. Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is. -- A woman walks into a drugstore and asks the pharmacist if he sells size extra large condoms. He replies, "Yes we do. Would you like to buy some?" She responds, "No, but do you mind if I wait around here until someone does? |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"TMS320" wrote in message ... "The Medway Handyman" wrote Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You probably qualify on both grounds. But a car seat would interfere with pedalling action and make the bike very heavy. Yes it would. Best to do away with the bicycle and attach the chair to something more sensible. Like a car. |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside of your car looks better. What car? Any car beats a city. Not relevant in my case. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Mon, 18 May 2015 22:23:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a car. Well I don't, for many purposes. Like? Carrying small things Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Visiting Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Going where there are no parks. I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you live in one of those silly congested cities. Breathing fresh air off the countryside. I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while you travel, open the car window. Air in hair. Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien growth cycle helmets. Lots of things. That is all I am going to say. I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around. And I am not dictating how you should get around. you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with different preferences, can you? Heil Hitler! I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions. Those are your opinions. My opinions are different. "comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective facts. I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler. The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster". I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your opinions. Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for anyone. That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances. How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it? What do you sit on to watch TV? What does that have to do with transport choices? It shows the most comfy form of seating. PS Most TV is shi*t. Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is. So I would go to a chair with no TV. Like a bicycle seat. |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:10:06 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2015 22:23:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:18:44 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to a car. Well I don't, for many purposes. Like? Carrying small things Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Visiting Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car. Going where there are no parks. I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless you live in one of those silly congested cities. Breathing fresh air off the countryside. I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air while you travel, open the car window. Air in hair. Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien growth cycle helmets. Lots of things. That is all I am going to say. I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around. And I am not dictating how you should get around. you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you, with different preferences, can you? Heil Hitler! I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions. Those are your opinions. My opinions are different. "comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective facts. I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler. The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster". I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your opinions. Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for anyone. That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances. How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it? What do you sit on to watch TV? What does that have to do with transport choices? It shows the most comfy form of seating. PS Most TV is shi*t. Irrelevant to how comfy your chair is. So I would go to a chair with no TV. Like a bicycle seat. You would sit in your living room and read a book on a bicycle seat? -- Peter is listening to "The Shadows - Sleepwalk" |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote: On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote: Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have them in our houses. Bull****. I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are a liar. You need to find one person who sits on one instead of an armchair in their living room. Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You need to find a handful at least. Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should appreciate this. So bicycling is great? Not in cities. You are entitled to your opinion. A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no scenery. The inside of your car looks better. What car? Any car beats a city. Not relevant in my case. You're the one talking about cities and bicycles. -- In 1272, the Arabic Muslims invented the condom, using a goat's lower intestine. In 1873, the British refined the idea by taking the intestine out of the goat first. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclists causing pollution. | Dave-Cyclists VORT | UK | 0 | January 26th 14 09:01 PM |
Reckless cyclists causing trouble in Catford | Mr Benn[_5_] | UK | 6 | March 10th 12 05:41 AM |
Cyclists causing traffic delays | Mr. Benn[_9_] | UK | 66 | March 9th 12 10:33 AM |
Yet another place where cyclists are causing problems. | PeterG | UK | 114 | July 16th 10 05:47 PM |
Duh's greenhouse effect to proceed when medical certificate is inhand | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 3 | December 17th 09 12:54 AM |