Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle
is more comfortable then a chair to prove you are
a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one instead
of an armchair in their living room. Even then,
you may find the odd freak on a BDSM site. You
need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no
scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is trees
etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can you?
Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris, London,
Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong. Anything to
do with cycling for example.


"I do not post waffling bull**** or childish insults".

"He is indeed very stupid, and easy to make fun of".

(Peter Hucker)

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle
is more comfortable then a chair to prove you
are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no
scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all
day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong. Anything
to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities, beautiful
bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions there. Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a moron.

--
FREE TIBET!!!! (with purchase of 1 mainland china)

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle
is more comfortable then a chair to prove you
are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and no
scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all
day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong. Anything
to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities, beautiful
bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions there. Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a moron.

"I admit I should not have been born".
(Peter Hucker)

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and
no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all
day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

On Fri, 29 May 2015 10:20:49 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and
no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all
day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

I've done so plenty of times. He's tedious and he's blocked.

--
In the beginning, there was nothing, which exploded.

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable
than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a BDSM
site. You need to find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside, should
appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air and
no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let my
life be governed by the strange workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a few.
Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the beach all
day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to a well
known prick?

On Fri, 29 May 2015 17:44:49 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 10:20:49 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at
least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside,
should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air
and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let
my life be governed by the strange workings of your
brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome,
Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a
few. Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the
beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't
you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions
there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

I've done so plenty of times. He's tedious and he's blocked.

Why do people insult others?

insulting others gives them comfort for their own imperfections, makes
them feel powerful, and helps them to feel better about themselves.
Helplessness for this individual is the root of all of his or her
emotional problems and insulting people is their outlet....

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at
least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside,
should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air
and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let
my life be governed by the strange workings of your
brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome,
Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a
few. Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the
beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't
you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions
there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to a well
known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at
least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside,
should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air
and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let
my life be governed by the strange workings of your
brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome,
Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a
few. Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the
beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't
you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions
there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to a well
known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of cyclists.

--
The Muslim across the road started yelling "I'm going to end it all!", and started to pour petrol over himself.
As he was about to strike a match, I shouted "Abdul, no! Stop, wait, it's times like these that you need your family around you!"

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:13:51 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 17:44:49 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 10:20:49 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a
saddle is more comfortable then a chair to
prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits on one
instead of an armchair in their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak on a
BDSM site. You need to find a handful at
least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A
cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and countryside,
should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh air
and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete. Beautiful is
trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going to let
my life be governed by the strange workings of your
brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday, not a
city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help lying can
you? Many many people go to a city for a holiday, Rome,
Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to name a
few. Many many people go to a hot country and lie on the
beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU **** fer
brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says is
wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you don't
you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your opinions
there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing with a
moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have your
feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

I've done so plenty of times. He's tedious and he's blocked.

Why do people insult others?

insulting others gives them comfort for their own imperfections, makes
them feel powerful, and helps them to feel better about themselves.
Helplessness for this individual is the root of all of his or her
emotional problems and insulting people is their outlet....

It's Steve that insulted me, not the other way around.

--
Sweet dreams are made of cheese, who am I to diss a Brie? I cheddar the world and the feta cheese, everybody's looking for Stilton.