Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:55:03 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:07:56 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 16:51:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:13:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 16:23:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy
no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who
says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits
on one instead of an armchair in their
living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak
on a BDSM site. You need to find a
handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison
cell.
A cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and
countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh
air and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and
bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually
incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly
city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete.
Beautiful is trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going
to let my life be governed by the strange
workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday,
not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help
lying can you? Many many people go to a city for a
holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to
name a few. Many many people go to a hot country and
lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU ****
fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says
is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you
don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other
opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your
opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing
with a moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have
your feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to
a well known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of
cyclists.

Oh no I am not. I am agreeing with Mr Pounder.
Can you not read?
I was responding to Mr Pounder's post. Not yours.

Do you agree cyclists should be pushed over if they ride on the
pavement?

The relevance of that post is about as much as a comment on the
sliming habits of hagfish.

Mr Pounder pushes cyclists off the pavement.

As you well know, Mr Pounder has yet to do this, but is prepared to do
it.
Why can't you stop lying Mr Hucker?

I would be also, if said bicyclist is about to hit a pedestrian.

As I have said, I will not give way whilst walking on the footpath to
footpath riding cyclist. Should the cyclist turn aggressive I will allow him
to throw the first punch. Then, it is my turn.
This confrontation has yet to happen as Mr Hucker well knows. Yet, he
insists on lying that it has.

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:24:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:55:03 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:07:56 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 16:51:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:13:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 16:23:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy
no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who
says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits
on one instead of an armchair in their
living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak
on a BDSM site. You need to find a
handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison
cell.
A cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and
countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh
air and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and
bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually
incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly
city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete.
Beautiful is trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going
to let my life be governed by the strange
workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday,
not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help
lying can you? Many many people go to a city for a
holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to
name a few. Many many people go to a hot country and
lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU ****
fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says
is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you
don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other
opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your
opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing
with a moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have
your feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to
a well known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of
cyclists.

Oh no I am not. I am agreeing with Mr Pounder.
Can you not read?
I was responding to Mr Pounder's post. Not yours.

Do you agree cyclists should be pushed over if they ride on the
pavement?

The relevance of that post is about as much as a comment on the
sliming habits of hagfish.

Mr Pounder pushes cyclists off the pavement.

As you well know, Mr Pounder has yet to do this, but is prepared to do
it.
Why can't you stop lying Mr Hucker?

I would be also, if said bicyclist is about to hit a pedestrian.

The smaller thing always gets out of the way of the larger thing, this is also true in boating.

--
The sailor does not pray for wind, he learns to sail -- Gustaf Lindborg

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:24:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:55:03 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:07:56 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 16:51:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:13:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 16:23:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough Guy
no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who
says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

You need to find one person who sits
on one instead of an armchair in their
living room.
Even then, you may find the odd freak
on a BDSM site. You need to find a
handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison
cell.
A cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and
countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no fresh
air and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and
bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually
incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the ugly
city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete.
Beautiful is trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not going
to let my life be governed by the strange
workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday,
not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help
lying can you? Many many people go to a city for a
holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to
name a few. Many many people go to a hot country and
lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU ****
fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he says
is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you
don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other
opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays, cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your
opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing
with a moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have
your feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing to
a well known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of
cyclists.

Oh no I am not. I am agreeing with Mr Pounder.
Can you not read?
I was responding to Mr Pounder's post. Not yours.

Do you agree cyclists should be pushed over if they ride on the
pavement?

The relevance of that post is about as much as a comment on the
sliming habits of hagfish.

Mr Pounder pushes cyclists off the pavement.

As you well know, Mr Pounder has yet to do this, but is prepared to do
it.
Why can't you stop lying Mr Hucker?

I would be also, if said bicyclist is about to hit a pedestrian.

The smaller thing always gets out of the way of the larger thing, this is also true in boating.

--
The sailor does not pray for wind, he learns to sail -- Gustaf Lindborg

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:01:39 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:24:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:55:03 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:07:56 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 16:51:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:13:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 16:23:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough
Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who
says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a
liar.

You need to find one person who sits
on one instead of an armchair in
their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd
freak on a BDSM site. You need to
find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison
cell.
A cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and
countryside, should appreciate
this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no
fresh air and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and
bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually
incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the
ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete.
Beautiful is trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not
going to let my life be governed by the strange
workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday,
not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your
definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help
lying can you? Many many people go to a city for a
holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to
name a few. Many many people go to a hot country
and lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU ****
fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he
says is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you
don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other
opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is
wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays,
cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your
opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing
with a moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have
your feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing
to a well known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of
cyclists.

Oh no I am not. I am agreeing with Mr Pounder.
Can you not read?
I was responding to Mr Pounder's post. Not yours.

Do you agree cyclists should be pushed over if they ride on the
pavement?

The relevance of that post is about as much as a comment on the
sliming habits of hagfish.

Mr Pounder pushes cyclists off the pavement.

As you well know, Mr Pounder has yet to do this, but is prepared to do
it.
Why can't you stop lying Mr Hucker?

I would be also, if said bicyclist is about to hit a pedestrian.

The smaller thing sometimes gets out of the way of the larger thing,
this
is also true in boating.

IFYPFY

On Sun, 07 Jun 2015 09:16:24 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 21:01:39 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:24:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:55:03 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 10:07:56 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 16:51:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 31 May 2015 10:13:47 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 16:23:25 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 30 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 29 May 2015 19:54:58 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 28 May 2015 15:03:04 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 28 May 2015 10:08:25 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 20:36:11 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Wed, 27 May 2015 10:30:02 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 14:27:44 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Tue, 26 May 2015 10:28:22 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 12:10:34 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Mon, 25 May 2015 10:43:48 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:56:37 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265
wrote:

On Sun, 24 May 2015 09:50:28 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sat, 23 May 2015 20:58:23 +0100, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:26:01 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 15:06:15 +0100, Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 22 May 2015 10:13:30 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 12:00:26 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Thu, 21 May 2015 10:28:17 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 15:03:25 +0100, Tough Guy
no.
1265 wrote:

On Wed, 20 May 2015 10:19:28 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 17:01:29 +0100, Tough
Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Tue, 19 May 2015 10:08:46 +0100, Peter
Keller
wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 15:57:47 +0100, Tough
Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Mon, 18 May 2015 10:01:04 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 23:54:20 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Sun, 17 May 2015 10:46:23 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sat, 16 May 2015 22:45:06 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 12:21:08 +0100,
Peter Keller
wrote:

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100,
Tough Guy no.
1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more
comfortable than a chair,
or we'd have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who
says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a
liar.

You need to find one person who sits
on one instead of an armchair in
their living room.
Even then, you may find the odd
freak on a BDSM site. You need to
find a handful at least.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison
cell.
A cyclists,
who enjoys fresh air and
countryside, should appreciate
this.

So bicycling is great?

Not in cities.

You are entitled to your opinion.

A city is an eyesore. There is no
fresh air and no scenery.
The inside of your car looks better.

What car?

Any car beats a city.

Not relevant in my case.

You're the one talking about cities and
bicycles.

Cities and bicycles are not mutually
incompatible.
So your statements are irrelevant.

The car prevents you being exposed to the
ugly city.

My city is beautiful.
I have never seen your car.

No city is beautiful. They're concrete.
Beautiful is trees etc.

That is your subjective opinion. I am not
going to let my life be governed by the strange
workings of your brain.

Most people go to the countryside for a holiday,
not a city.

Thank God I am not most people by your
definition.

It's not my definition. It's a fact.

It's another one of your lies. You just can't help
lying can you? Many many people go to a city for a
holiday, Rome, Paris,
London, Blackpool (not a city), Los Vagas just to
name a few. Many many people go to a hot country
and lie on the beach all day.
A minority holiday in the countryside, so STFU ****
fer brains.

+1. Agreed.

You're agreeing with someone who pushes cyclists off
pavements.

I am agreeing with what he posted.
You are adding something totally irrelevant.

He attacks cyclists for no good reason. Anything he
says is wrong.

That is your opinion. I do not agree with it.
You hate it when people have different opinions from you
don't you?

He has different opinions to everybody.

So?
At least he is open to the fact that there might be other
opinions.
You are not.

No he isn't. Anyone with an opinion other than his is
wrong.
Anything to do with cycling for example.

I don't agree.

You think he likes cyclists in any way shape or form?

Besides you neatly pulled the subject from holidays,
cities,
beautiful bicycles etc. Shows how sure you are of your
opinions there.
Not.

I did no such thing, I simply pointed out you were agreeing
with a moron.

For ****'s sake do not use me like a coward to convey or have
your feelings about another person.
Or are you not man enough to tell him that to his face?

By this time you will have realised that you have been typing
to a well known prick?

Oh yes! I knew that ages ago.
All his delusions about how his opinions are "fact" etc ... `

You are describing Mr Pounder well. Ask him what he thinks of
cyclists.

Oh no I am not. I am agreeing with Mr Pounder.
Can you not read?
I was responding to Mr Pounder's post. Not yours.

Do you agree cyclists should be pushed over if they ride on the
pavement?

The relevance of that post is about as much as a comment on the
sliming habits of hagfish.

Mr Pounder pushes cyclists off the pavement.

As you well know, Mr Pounder has yet to do this, but is prepared to do
it.
Why can't you stop lying Mr Hucker?

I would be also, if said bicyclist is about to hit a pedestrian.

The smaller thing sometimes gets out of the way of the larger thing,
this
is also true in boating.

IFYPFY

If it doesn't, it gets squashed, and won't make the same mistake twice.

--
In the first few days of the Olympics the Rumanians took gold, silver, bronze, copper, lead and anything else they could get their bloody hands on.