Cyclists causing greenhouse effect

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:25:08 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration. Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top
Gear were forced to acknowledge.

He is so arrogant as to think that his opinions must be establiched facts.

I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right.

--
In the UK, 17% of employees are health and safety officers.
Say NO! to health and safety in the workplace, before there are no real workers left!
Look out for yourself and stop blaming each other like 6 year olds!

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not objective
facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control your
opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances.
How do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?

What do you sit on to watch TV?

--
In the UK, 17% of employees are health and safety officers.
Say NO! to health and safety in the workplace, before there are no real workers left!
Look out for yourself and stop blaming each other like 6 year olds!

"Tough Guy no. 1265" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:25:08 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 22:38:36 +0100, Phil W Lee wrote:

"Tough Guy no. 1265" considered Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14
+0100 the perfect time to write:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access to
a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens, unless
you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those alien
growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to
carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles under
consideration. Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as even Top
Gear were forced to acknowledge.

He is so arrogant as to think that his opinions must be establiched
facts.

I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right.

Yea?
LMFAO
You silly PHucker.

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:58 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Thu, 14 May 2015 11:24:01 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 15:44:45 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Wed, 13 May 2015 10:42:47 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On Tue, 12 May 2015 19:55:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Mon, 11 May 2015 09:50:31 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 16:51:14 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 10:00:12 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2015 00:33:32 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2015 09:27:35 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On Fri, 08 May 2015 18:04:33 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I find it pointless as a means of transport if you have access
to a car.

Well I don't, for many purposes.

Like?

Carrying small things

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Visiting

Can be done quicker and more comfortably in a car.

Going where there are no parks.

I take it you mean car parks. That's not often that happens,
unless you live in one of those silly congested cities.

Breathing fresh air off the countryside.

I already said cycling is for leisure. If you just want fresh air
while you travel, open the car window.

Air in hair.

Get a convertible, anyway that doesn't work with one of those
alien growth cycle helmets.

Lots of things.
That is all I am going to say.
I am not going to have control freaks dictate how I get around.
And I am not dictating how you should get around.

you cannot conceive that other people might be different from you,
with different preferences, can you?
Heil Hitler!

I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more
convenient to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not
opinions.

Those are your opinions.
My opinions are different.
"comfortable" "more convenient" are subjective feelings. not
objective facts.
I will not have my subjective feelings controlled by you, Hitler.
The only adjective I might agree with, sometimes, is "faster".
I do not have the arrogance (or guts, take your pick) to control
your opinions.

Sitting on a saddle is not more comfortable than a soft chair, for
anyone.

That is your belief. Not necessarily a fact in all circumstances. How
do you know that my bum is the same as yours? Have you seen it?

What do you sit on to watch TV?

What does that have to do with transport choices?

PS Most TV is shi*t.

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have
them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then
a chair to prove you are a liar.

Overpopulated. Verging on prison cell. A cyclists, who enjoys fresh
air and countryside, should appreciate this.

So bicycling is great?

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:41 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

I am intelligent enough to know when I'm right.

Suit yourself.
I have absolutely no desire to be like you.

On Thu, 14 May 2015 18:44:19 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:

Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.

And I. And loving it.
Thanks very much grand sir for your great accolades.
Now please direct to me from you the further compliment of cockered bum-
bailey poofter

"Peter Keller" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd have
them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable then
a chair to prove you are a liar.

But then you would have already found one liar, so you wouldn't have to go
looking for more, would you?

On 14/05/2015 19:29, colwyn wrote:
On 14/05/2015 18:44, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 13/05/2015 22:38, Phil W Lee wrote:


I just stated that a car is more comfortable, faster, more convenient
to carry things, all sorts. These are facts not opinions.

More comfortable is a matter of opinion and the specific vehicles
under consideration.


Anybody who believes that a thin, hard bicycle seat is more comfortable
than a car seat is either an imbecile or has a bizarre anal fetish. You
probably qualify on both grounds.


Faster is simply untrue in any urban area, as
even Top Gear were forced to acknowledge.


Top Gear weren't forced to acknowledge anything of the sort, idiot. The
challenge was clearly staged for TV entertainment only.

It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a
bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice.


I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNyadU6NPEU

That isn't filtering, it's dangerously weaving through traffic in order
to jump the queue. Why do cyclists complain about cars passing too
closely but seem happy about the reverse?

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Fri, 15 May 2015 15:10:32 +0100, Tarcap wrote:

"Peter Keller" wrote in message ...

On Fri, 15 May 2015 00:08:17 +0100, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:

Nobody would say a saddle is more comfortable than a chair, or we'd
have them in our houses.

Bull****.
I only need to find one person who says a saddle is more comfortable
then a chair to prove you are a liar.

But then you would have already found one liar, so you wouldn't have to
go looking for more, would you?

Correct. I can enjoy my comfortable bicycle saddle while appreciating
the delights of bicycling instead.