|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 14:15, Tarcap wrote:
"colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But that is all part of that particular job. Sitting in an office (or similar environment) next to someone smelling like a wildebeest is definitely not. It was you who generalised - anyone suffering body odour has a problem, not necessarily a bicycle. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. I've heard that bull**** before on this NG. I didn't believe it then, and I certainly don't now. It could be that you don't smell your own stink, in the same way that a skunk doesn't find his own smell offensive, perhaps? Just open your eyes and do some research! As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. Do you have a cite for that, or did you just make it up? I said "AS A GUESS" It's uncomfortable sitting in wet/damp clothes By the way sweat does NOT smell! As I thought, you are oblivious to your own stench. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx SWEAT DOES NOT SMELL - Just look it up , don't think! http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx (Researchers found barely half of British adults always wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet. And a quarter of workers claim to be too rushed to wash and dry their hands properly after nipping to the loo. A morning shower is regularly skipped by 58 per cent of men, with a quarter admitting they would rather have the extra time in bed. One in three said they simply couldn’t be bothered.) And quite a few compound the issue by pedalling to work on a bike, without even showering then! If there are only 2% of people cycling the other 56% regularly skipping on Hygiene could either be you or the next person you shake hands with. |
Ads |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 12:52, colwyn wrote:
On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) However, if you commuted from the Medway Towns to London - as thousands of people do on a daily basis, a push bike is a hopeless alternative. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 13:49, colwyn wrote:
On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. By the way sweat does NOT smell! But cyclists do. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 14:23, JNugent wrote:
On 16/05/2015 12:52, colwyn wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Absolutely: a made-up journey to work that hardly exists in the real world outside the rarified environs of inner West London can be tweaked so that a bicycle "wins". You won't find many to disagree with that. I wonder whether a cyclist would have beaten me yesterday on my 67 mile journey to work (by car)? Of course they would. It would only take them 5 hours or so. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 14:15, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But that is all part of that particular job. Sitting in an office (or similar environment) next to someone smelling like a wildebeest is definitely not. It was you who generalised - anyone suffering body odour has a problem, not necessarily a bicycle. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. I've heard that bull**** before on this NG. I didn't believe it then, and I certainly don't now. It could be that you don't smell your own stink, in the same way that a skunk doesn't find his own smell offensive, perhaps? Just open your eyes and do some research! As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. Do you have a cite for that, or did you just make it up? I said "AS A GUESS" It's uncomfortable sitting in wet/damp clothes By the way sweat does NOT smell! As I thought, you are oblivious to your own stench. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx SWEAT DOES NOT SMELL - Just look it up , don't think! http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx (Researchers found barely half of British adults always wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet. And a quarter of workers claim to be too rushed to wash and dry their hands properly after nipping to the loo. A morning shower is regularly skipped by 58 per cent of men, with a quarter admitting they would rather have the extra time in bed. One in three said they simply couldn’t be bothered.) And quite a few compound the issue by pedalling to work on a bike, without even showering then! If there are only 2% of people cycling the other 56% regularly skipping on Hygiene could either be you or the next person you shake hands with. You seem to be making the mistake of assuming that all the cyclists are the clean ones. I have already asked you if you had a cite for that, and you have already admitted that you had just made it up by just guessing at it. So you did make it up, then. |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 14:15, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But that is all part of that particular job. Sitting in an office (or similar environment) next to someone smelling like a wildebeest is definitely not. It was you who generalised - anyone suffering body odour has a problem, not necessarily a bicycle. I didn't for one minute suggest that the bicycles smell, just the riders. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. I've heard that bull**** before on this NG. I didn't believe it then, and I certainly don't now. It could be that you don't smell your own stink, in the same way that a skunk doesn't find his own smell offensive, perhaps? Just open your eyes and do some research! I did, that's why I said that cyclists smell, but are in denial of it. As usual. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. Do you have a cite for that, or did you just make it up? I said "AS A GUESS" It's uncomfortable sitting in wet/damp clothes Yes, that's why I use a car for transport. It has a roof which keeps me dry. By the way sweat does NOT smell! As I thought, you are oblivious to your own stench. http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx SWEAT DOES NOT SMELL - Just look it up , don't think! http://www.nhs.uk/conditions/Body-od...roduction.aspx Maybe not, but the dampness of the sweat activates others odours. Ever sat next to a wet dog? Try it, you'll see what I mean. As long as your own smell is weaker than that of the wet dog. If not, it would have a cloaking effect and you wouldn't smell anything. The only way to tell that is if the dog moves away from you to get away from the smell. (Researchers found barely half of British adults always wash their hands with soap after visiting the toilet. And a quarter of workers claim to be too rushed to wash and dry their hands properly after nipping to the loo. A morning shower is regularly skipped by 58 per cent of men, with a quarter admitting they would rather have the extra time in bed. One in three said they simply couldn’t be bothered.) And quite a few compound the issue by pedalling to work on a bike, without even showering then! If there are only 2% of people cycling the other 56% regularly skipping on Hygiene could either be you or the next person you shake hands with. A good indicator would be if they came into work on a bike and didn't shower. You would know they were one of the unclean ones. Apart from the smell, of course, which does tend to give it away a bit. |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. By the way sweat does NOT smell! That is one of the stupidest things I have read for a very long time. |
#88
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
On 16/05/2015 17:10, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
"colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. By the way sweat does NOT smell! That is one of the stupidest things I have read for a very long time. Really? He is technically correct. Sweat on its own does not smell. It's the bacteria. |
#89
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
I suggest you do a bit more reading
|
#90
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists causing greenhouse effect
"Bod" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 17:10, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 13:10, Tarcap wrote: "colwyn" wrote in message ... On 16/05/2015 11:58, JNugent wrote: On 16/05/2015 11:09, colwyn wrote: On 15/05/2015 20:17, The Medway Handyman wrote: YOU SAID: It certainly doesn't apply to 'any urban area'. I'll wager £1,000 that a bicycle would lose on either of two urban area journeys of my choice. I replied: I would wager a bicycle to win on ANY route of MY choice! I then showed an example of a clip to illustrate my point. I could have chosen: Cycle path runs (part of which are in that video) Bus Routes ( where push-bikes are permitted ) Short cuts on shared path. or legal filtering at busy times. My point still stands and my "toy" would still get to MY destination first! I was left wondering, why anybody would want to challenge you (or me) on a skewed wager? Excellent point. The celebrated "Top Gear" commuter competitions were exactly that: rigged. Real commuter journeys don't start in inner-city locations and end at other locations within the same inner-city. Or at least, the vast majority don't. Inner-city - I would venture, door to door, a bicycle would beat a car on most up to 2-3 mile run. By the time you got your motor out of the garage/ car park/ parking space next road and found parking space at your destination I would be ready at work (for example) Don't forget to factor in the showering/ changing time at the end of the journey, though. Or are you quite happy to share your Eau de polecat with your co-workers? What? Building site/ Garbage disposal/ Water treatment / Chimney sweep/ Sewerage plant/ I am sure you find many more by typing " smelly jobs" into Google. But seriously, I don't think short distances on a bike at a reasonable speed would cause any more smelly perspiration than sitting in a queue of stalled traffic clutching a sweaty steering wheel. As a guess I think cyclists are much better at personal hygiene. By the way sweat does NOT smell! That is one of the stupidest things I have read for a very long time. Really? He is technically correct. Sweat on its own does not smell. It's the bacteria. That is one of the stupidest things I have read for a very long time. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cyclists causing pollution. | Dave-Cyclists VORT | UK | 0 | January 26th 14 08:01 PM |
Reckless cyclists causing trouble in Catford | Mr Benn[_5_] | UK | 6 | March 10th 12 04:41 AM |
Cyclists causing traffic delays | Mr. Benn[_9_] | UK | 66 | March 9th 12 09:33 AM |
Yet another place where cyclists are causing problems. | PeterG | UK | 114 | July 16th 10 05:47 PM |
Duh's greenhouse effect to proceed when medical certificate is inhand | Andre Jute[_2_] | Techniques | 3 | December 16th 09 11:54 PM |