|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
not enough standards
On 1/19/2018 3:45 PM, Joerg wrote:
On 2018-01-19 14:55, sms wrote: On 1/19/2018 8:24 AM, AMuzi wrote: https://cyclingindustry.news/knolly-...axle-standard/ Hell, I can remember way back when a guy could swap wheels between two different bicycles. I SPIT on the whole 1x movement. +1 I also spat on the 2x movement. My road bike has 2x (42/52) but because it is 35 years old and back then that's all you could get. I suffer on steep hills for that but as the drill sergeant always said, anything that doesn't instantly kill you makes you tough. In my area, if you want to ride up into the Santa Cruz mountains and you're older than a millenial, it's really nice to have a triple on a road bike. In the early 1980's, triples weren't that common then around 1983 most of the road bikes sold around hear suddenly were coming with triples, like my Specialized Sirrus, which had a dual and a triple option, with the triple at an extra $100. Touring bikes of course had triples for a long time. Last year I did a benefit ride, which I normally avoid but my little group of troublemakers had a team, and those without a triple were suffering. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Standards; always room for one more! | AMuzi | Techniques | 26 | January 1st 18 05:30 PM |
Japanese standards | AMuzi | Techniques | 1 | November 25th 14 08:56 PM |
Australian Helmet standards | Walrus | Australia | 33 | September 20th 05 09:25 AM |
h*lm*t standards where's the web site? | Bryan | UK | 5 | August 18th 05 09:52 AM |
Driving standards | Tom | UK | 20 | February 11th 04 12:36 AM |