|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
Dane Buson wrote:
In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. Do you want to punch Commandante Monkey Poop or Tom Keats? -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate. |
Ads |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
"KingOfTheApes" wrote in message ... On Nov 13, 8:46 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "KingOfTheApes" wrote in message ... OK, I just found a Republican who rides a bike for practical purposes. "Rara avis" indeed, but well he's bruised but alive to tell his story... Originally Posted by cujet I am convinced bicycling is not safe. I have been riding for years, mostly to work and for fun. A recent accident broke my left arm into 7 pieces. Surgery put it back together. However, I now have a non union of the bone in 2 places. I'm 45 years old and bones don't heal as well at this age. It looks like I will be held together by screws and a plate. I may never be able to put any load on my left arm. Accident statistics on bicycling are horrific per mile traveled. In my case, I achieved a lifetime of about 15,000 miles before a serious acccident. Sorry, but bicycling is not the answer, or even part of the answer. AND, there is no way in he!! I am going to save energy for Obama. I do it for me. Chris See, you just seem to deny my theory that Republicans don't care enough about anything to ride a bike for practical purposes. But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Either God or the Revolution, right? Try to edit your responses of unnecessary material before attempting to empress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly. You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up,drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs. Hey, Dr. Evil, instead of spewing insults you should check yourself to find your true colors... (of course, also check your blood pressure) http://www.politicalcompass.org/ Originally Posted by Ka_Jun Your political compass Economic Left/Right: -9.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.15 *** You fall under the revolution parameters. Neither party will solve the problem. I think the revolution needs to be left libertarian. Left libertarians see the need for COOPERATION, and traffic takes a lot of it. Not too anarchist though as we need the government to set up cameras to root out the bad drivers, but not to control speed. Actually I believe in an American autobahn, while having BIKE LANES at the same time. Is that a contradiction? Well, it happens in Germany. You are, at varying times, tedious, boring, earth shatteringly hilarious in your idiocy,childish, moronic, pathetic, wretched, disgusting and pitiful. You are wholly without any redeeming social graces or value. If God ever decides to give the planet an enema you'd better run like the wind because anywhere you stand is a suitable place for The Insertion. And you probably dress funny, too. ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
"KingOfTheApes" wrote in message ... On Nov 13, 9:06 pm, (Tom Keats) wrote: In article , KingOfTheApes writes: OK, I just found a Republican who rides a bike for practical purposes. "Rara avis" indeed, but well he's bruised but alive to tell his story... Originally Posted by cujet I am convinced bicycling is not safe. I have been riding for years, mostly to work and for fun. A recent accident broke my left arm into 7 pieces. Surgery put it back together. However, I now have a non union of the bone in 2 places. I'm 45 years old and bones don't heal as well at this age. It looks like I will be held together by screws and a plate. I may never be able to put any load on my left arm. I see you're still trying to scare people away from riding. Accident statistics on bicycling are horrific per mile traveled. In my ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ They are, are they? Have /you/ looked at any real accident statistics on bicycling? And who the heck is this "cujet" guy, and where did he post the above? case, I achieved a lifetime of about 15,000 miles before a serious acccident. I wonder what "cujet" did, to fsck up so badly after only 15,000 miles. Sorry, but bicycling is not the answer, or even part of the answer. AND, there is no way in he!! I am going to save energy for Obama. I do it for me. Chris *** See, you just seem to deny my theory that Republicans don't care enough about anything to ride a bike for practical purposes. I've met a number of folks with Republican leanings here in r.b.m. I think they're mostly nice people, and I'm mostly an apolitical, irreligious libertine. In fact, I think most people, whether with Republican or Democrat, or Conservative or Liberal leanings are roughly "centerists" with overlapping viewpoints, maybe with some few contentious outlier opinions on certain topics that haven't yet led to The End Of Days. Republicans are not the enemy. Self-purported, self-styled "revolutionaries" who want to upset the applecart are. Of whom does that description remind you? But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. OK, he fell down himself, but I've felt intimidated enough to make me lose my balance. Republicans just ignore how bad our roads are since they mostly drive SUVs, and then try to make Iraq safe. Of course, the Democrats also ignore the issue if only they talk about some of the problems here... Originally Posted by Ebbtide "I'd venture to guess that cyclists break down about the same as the national party affiliation. Perhaps a little more left, but not much." Let's see Red is SUV town, hostile to bikes; Blue, friendly to public transportation and bicycles. But the Democratic Party Machine doesn't deliver the goods either. Are all the Democratic party officials driving SUVs? You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You're a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won't have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot. ****ing Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In rec.bicycles.misc Bill Sornson wrote:
Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. You want to punch someone in the face over what's quoted above? Wow. Nah, it's more of a generalized desire due to BananaBoy's (or whatever nym he's using this week) general idiocy. Really, I'm not all bent out of shape, I wish he'd just go away. -- Dane Buson - "Ladies, leave your clothes here and spend the afternoon having a good time." -Sign seen in a Rome laundry |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Sherman wrote:
Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. Do you want to punch Commandante Monkey Poop or Tom Keats? Well, certainly not Tom. -- Dane Buson - Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally. -- Abraham Lincoln |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
Dane Buson wrote:
In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Sherman wrote: Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. Do you want to punch Commandante Monkey Poop or Tom Keats? Well, certainly not Tom. I am relieved to have my expectation confirmed. -- Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007 If you are not a part of the solution, you are a part of the precipitate. |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In rec.bicycles.misc KingOfTheApes wrote:
Originally Posted by cujet I am convinced bicycling is not safe. I have been riding for years, mostly to work and for fun. A recent accident broke my left arm into 7 pieces. Surgery put it back together. However, I now have a non union of the bone in 2 places. I'm 45 years old and bones don't heal as well at this age. It looks like I will be held together by screws and a plate. I may never be able to put any load on my left arm. Sounds a little bit like my crash. I busted an arm bone, my pinkie finger, and my leg. And I've got you [cujet] by 11 years. I'm into my tenth week of recuperation. But put the two of us together and all we add up to is anecdotal evidence. Accident statistics on bicycling are horrific per mile traveled. In my case, I achieved a lifetime of about 15,000 miles before a serious acccident. Yep, that's about how much I rode before mine. Sorry, but bicycling is not the answer, or even part of the answer. Bicycling IS the answer. I will probably be off bikes until spring, but when spring comes I'll be back riding full-time. Best thing to do when you get bucked off a horse is get right back on. It's enjoyable, I feel great when I do it, and I still have a scum-sucking pig of a disease (MS) to cure. Bill __o | Better is a poor and a wise child than an old and _`\(,_ | king, who will no more be admonished. (_)/ (_) | --Ecclesiastes 4: 13 |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In article ,
Dane Buson writes: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. I allow I may be encouraging Sgt Simian, by responding to, and rebutting his inanities. But I'm certain that ignoring him would actually encourage him all the more, as that would let his destructive fearmongering go unchallenged. To further explain my point: most regular perusers of these various x-posted newsgroups recognize his hogwash for what it is. But my concern is about incipient new ridership who may be affected to any degree. The very subject line of this thread was obviously designed to dissuade people who may be considering bicycling. Then he throws in unsubstantiated, unqualified, unquantified, ostensibly hearsay statements like: "Accident statistics on bicycling are horrific per mile traveled." Great way to promote bicycling, eh? Impugning people with certain /federal/ political leanings, for some alleged sorry state of affairs is just a feint to divert attention, so his planted seeds of Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt (about the safety of bicycling) might quietly and subtly sprout in the minds of folks thinking about taking up the bicycling avocation. The ol' hit-'n-run propaganda technique. His seeds are weeds in a garden. We can't ignore weeds in a garden. Not for very long, anyway. And to anybody in the world who is considering [re]joining the ranks of bicyclists: there are plenty of resources available on-line, in hard copy, at your local cycling clubs and among your cycling compatriots & peers, from which to learn to ride safely and enjoyably. If you see people already riding safely and enjoyably in your own parts of the world, that should be proof enough that BananaCreamBoy is working against you. cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In article ,
Tom Sherman writes: Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Sherman wrote: Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. Do you want to punch Commandante Monkey Poop or Tom Keats? Well, certainly not Tom. I am relieved to have my expectation confirmed. /You're/ relieved!? I just dodged a punch in the face! ( Hi, Dane :-) :-) ) cheers, Tom -- Nothing is safe from me. I'm really at: tkeats curlicue vcn dot bc dot ca |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
I am convinced bicycling is not safe
In article ,
Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Bill Sornson wrote: Dane Buson wrote: In rec.bicycles.misc Tom Keats wrote: In article KingOfTheApes writes: But since you say biking is so dangerous, and neither the Republican Party nor the Democratic Party is the solution, who's the solution? Solution to /what/ -- your disinformation about the supposed "dangerousness" of cycling? The solution to that is pretty obvious, but you're still here. I will admit that sometimes truly I long for the day where you can deliver a punch to the face over TCP/IP. It would purely make for a much politer interblag. You want to punch someone in the face over what's quoted above? Wow. Nah, it's more of a generalized desire due to BananaBoy's (or whatever nym he's using this week) general idiocy. Really, I'm not all bent out of shape, I wish he'd just go away. Judicious use of the killfile helps manage these kinds of problems pretty expiditiously. I just keep updating mine to keep including what's-his-face's latest sock puppet. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tom Danielson March 13 1978 - March 13 2008 | [email protected] | Racing | 0 | March 13th 08 09:31 AM |
Mt. Washington BC | nrkist | Unicycling | 4 | August 28th 05 11:21 PM |
Washington Post: A Rough Ride for Schwinn Bicycle | Ed | General | 12 | December 12th 04 04:24 AM |