A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bye bye motor vehicles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 26th 12, 10:39 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Bertie Wooster[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,958
Default Bye bye motor vehicles

“I’LL love and protect this car until death do us part,” says Toad, a
17-year-old loser whose life is briefly transformed by a “super fine”
1958 Chevy Impala in “American Graffiti”. The film follows him, his
friends and their vehicles through a late summer night in early 1960s
California: cruising the main drag, racing on the back streets and
necking in back seats of machines which embody not just speed,
prosperity and freedom but also adulthood, status and sex.

The movie was set in an age when owning wheels was a norm deeply
desired and newly achievable. Since then car ownership has grown
apace. There are now more than 1 billion cars in the world, and the
number is likely to roughly double by 2020. They are cheaper, faster,
safer and more comfortable than ever before.

Cars are integral to modern life. They account for 70% of all journeys
not made on foot in the OECD, which includes most developed countries.
In the European Union more than 12m people work in manufacturing and
services related to cars and other vehicles, around 6% of the total
employed population; the equivalent figure for America is 4.5% of
private-sector employment, or 8m jobs. They dominate household
economies too: aside from rent or mortgage payments, transport costs
are the single biggest weekly outlay, and most of those costs normally
come from cars.

Nearly 60m new cars were added to the world’s stock in 2011. People in
Asia, Latin America and Africa are buying cars pretty much as fast as
they can afford to, and as more can afford to, more will buy.

But in the rich world the car’s previously inexorable rise is
stalling. A growing body of academics cite the possibility that both
car ownership and vehicle-kilometres driven may be reaching saturation
in developed countries—or even be on the wane, a notion known as “peak
car”.

Recession and high fuel prices have markedly cut distances driven in
many countries since 2008, including America, Britain, France and
Sweden. But more profound and longer-run changes underlie recent
trends. Most forecasts still predict that when the recovery comes,
people will drive as much and in the same way as they ever have. But
that may not be true.

As a general trend, car ownership and kilometres travelled have been
increasing throughout the rich world since the 1950s. Short-term
factors like the 1970s oil-price shock caused temporary dips, but
vehicle use soon recovered.

The current fall in car use has doubtless been exacerbated by
recession. But it seems to have started before the crisis. A March
2012 study for the Australian government—which has been at the
forefront of international efforts to tease out peak-car
issues—suggested that 20 countries in the rich world show a
“saturating trend” to vehicle-kilometres travelled. After decades when
each individual was on average travelling farther every year, growth
per person has slowed distinctly, and in many cases stopped
altogether.

There are different measures of saturation: total distance driven,
distance per driver and total trips made. The statistics are striking
on each of these counts even in America, still the most car-mad
country in the world. There, total vehicle-kilometres travelled began
to plateau in 2004 and fall from 2007; measured per person, growth
flatlined sooner, after 2000, and dropped after 2004 before recovering
somewhat (see chart). The number of trips has fallen, mostly because
of a decline in commuting and shopping (of the non-virtual variety).

Britain, another nation that measures such things obsessively, has a
similar arc. Kilometres travelled per person were stable or falling
through most of the 2000s. Total traffic has not increased for a
decade, despite a growing population. For the past 15 years Britons
have been making fewer journeys; they now go out in cars only slightly
more often than in the 1970s. Pre-recession declines in per-person
travel were also recorded in France, Spain, Italy, Australia, New
Zealand and Belgium.

Saturation of car ownership over time is one explanation. The current
cohort of retirees—Toad from “American Graffiti”, having faked his
death in Vietnam, is now 67—is the first in which most people drove.
So more retired people drive now than ever before. In Britain 79% of
people in their 60s hold licences, which is higher than the figure for
the driving-age population as a whole; in America more than 90% of
people aged 60-64 can drive, a larger share than for any other cohort.
New generations of drivers will replace old ones rather than add to
the total number.

Then there is a second trend. All over the rich world, young people
are getting their licences later than they used to—in America (see
chart) and also in Britain, Canada, France, Norway, South Korea and
Sweden. Even in Germany, car-culture-vulture of Europe, the share of
young households without cars increased from 20% to 28% between 1998
and 2008. Unsurprisingly, this goes along with driving less. American
youngsters with jobs drive less far and less often than before the
recession. 16- to 34-year-olds in American households with incomes
over $70,000 increased their public-transport use by 100% from 2001 to
2009, according to the Frontier Group, a think-tank.

Cost is one factor: fuel prices have risen for all; insurance premiums
for the young have soared. Youth unemployment has not helped. But
there is also the influence of a new kid on the block: the internet. A
University of Michigan survey of 15 countries found that in areas
where a lot of young people use the internet, fewer than normal have
driving licences. A global survey of teen attitudes by TNS, a
consultancy, found that young people increasingly view cars as
appliances not aspirations, and say that social media give them the
access to their world that would once have been associated with cars.
KCR, a research firm, has found that in America far more 18- to
34-year-olds than any other age group say socialising online is a
substitute for some car trips.

Young people move around more and settle down later; they would rather
travel to far-off lands than cruise the strip downtown. Fleura Bardhi
of Northeastern University in Boston interviewed users of car-sharing
schemes, much more popular among the young than their elders, and
likened the youngsters’ attitudes to cars to their attitude to dating:
“People get to try out different cars, different lifestyles, different
identities.” By contrast owning a car, they said, felt like being tied
down—like a marriage.

In Arthur Miller’s 1949 play “Death of a Salesman”, Happy’s dream was
a simple one: “My own apartment, a car, and plenty of women.”
Subsequent generations of young men and, perhaps to a lesser extent,
young women agreed. But things seem to be changing. The buzz, status
and implicit sexuality of car ownership has been taken up, even
displaced, by other products and lifestyles, and not just among the
young. Tom Worsley, formerly of Britain’s Department for Transport,
says that, even for oldies, “It has become a bit passé to polish your
car on a Sunday morning.”

Another technological change means that the car not polished on Sunday
may not have been to the shops on Saturday, either. A sixth of
Britain’s retail spending now takes place online, according to IMRG, a
consultancy, and around a twentieth of America’s, according to the
Department of Commerce; everywhere the trend is rising. In Britain
trips to the shops have been the category of car use that has dropped
off most steeply since 1995.

Older people retaining their licences may swell the ranks of drivers
for a while yet, but eventually young people postponing the use or
purchase of cars could reduce them. The total number of people with
cars may thus drop. And more people owning cars—rather than longer
journeys—has been the prime driver of traffic growth in the past. If
ownership stabilises or declines, traffic may do so too.

Even without changing absolute numbers, however, age can still play a
role in patterns of use. Though more older people drive than used to,
per person they also tend to drive less. And so, if people keep
getting their licences later, may everyone else. The later people pass
their test, the less far they drive even once they can, according to
Gordon Stokes of Oxford University. He says people in Britain who
learn in their late 20s drive 30% less than those who learn a decade
earlier.

Geography matters too. In most rich countries car use has been stable
or increasing in rural areas, where driving still offers freedom and
convenience. It is in cities, especially their centres, that car
ownership and use is declining. And city living is on the rise: the
OECD, a rich-country think-tank, expects that by 2050, 86% of the rich
world’s population will live in urban areas, up from 77% in 2010.

In America the share of metropolitan residents without a car has grown
since the mid-1990s: 13% of people in cities of more than 3m people
have no car while only 6% in rural areas live without one. In London
car ownership has been falling since 1990, with a plateau from 1995 to
2005; the percentage of households without cars has been growing since
1992. In other British cities the proportion of carless households has
been growing since 2005. Car use has fallen in many European cities.

There are various reasons for this. Public mass-transit systems are,
in the main, faster and more reliable than they used to be, with
increased capacity in many cities. This partly reflects increased
investment, particularly in rail. For the past 15 years road and rail
investment has been about 1% of GDP for OECD countries, but rail’s
share of that has increased from 15% to 23%, says the International
Transport Forum.

More recently, private alternatives to car ownership, notably car
clubs, have been spreading across North America and northern Europe.
By some estimates one rental car can take the place of 15 owned
vehicles. Zipcar, which is the biggest international car-share scheme,
has 700,000 members and over 9,000 vehicles. Buzzcar, a French company
set up by the Zipcar founder, has 605,000 members sharing 9,000 cars.

Perhaps most basic, though, is that in terms of urban living the car
has become a victim of its own success. In 1994 the physicist Cesare
Marchetti argued that people budget an average travel time of around
one hour getting to work; they are unwilling to spend more. For
decades cars allowed this budget to go farther. But as suburbs grow
and congestion increases most cities eventually hit a “sprawl wall” of
too-long commutes beyond which they will not spread far. After that,
it appears, a significant number of people start to move back towards
the city centre. In America, where over 50% of the population lives in
suburbs, more than half the nation’s 51 largest cities are seeing more
growth in the core than outside it, according to William Frey at the
Brookings Institution.

If car use has peaked, what are the implications? One is that
vehicle-makers, which are already having a tough time, will not easily
find new markets in the rich world. In America available cars already
outnumber licensed drivers. “We are looking at replacement rather than
growth in these countries,” says Yves van der Straaten of the OICA, an
international trade body of car manufacturers.

Some niche and luxury brands are thriving and are likely to keep doing
so. But manufacturers know that the developing world is the
future—sales in China overtook those in America between 2010 and 2011
and rose by 2.6%; those in Indonesia, a younger market, jumped by 17%.

A more radical response from carmakers could be to say that if buyers
are less interested in driving, then cars will require less driving
from them. Driverless cars—robot-guided vehicles that leave their
occupants free to text, work or sleep—could go on sale within the next
decade, and might meet the mood of the moment. They could be safer and
a lot less hassle. Flocking together through clever algorithms, they
could cut congestion dramatically. They might further strain the
already weakening link between driving and identity and the sense of
driving as an expression of self and skill. But they could still be a
highly profitable innovation.

Even if they are not faced by an invasion of robo-taxis, governments
may find that changes in driving habits force them to rethink
infrastructure. Most forecasting models that governments employ assume
that driving will continue to increase indefinitely. Urban planning,
in particular, has for half a century focused on cars.

America built 64,000 kilometres (40,000 miles) of interstate highway
to get the country moving after the second world war; since 1980 it
has built more than 35,000 new lane-kilometres a year. If policymakers
are confident that car use is waning they can focus on improving lives
and infrastructure in areas already blighted by traffic rather than
catering for future growth. That is already happening in London, where
cars pay to enter the centre and ever more space is dedicated to buses
and cycles. At Canary Wharf, a business district in east London,
100,000 jobs are supported by only 3,000 parking spaces.

By improving alternatives to driving, city authorities can try to lock
in the benefits of declining car use. Cars take up more space per
person than any other form of transport—one lane of a freeway can
transport 2,500 people per hour by car, versus 5,000 in a bus and
50,000 in a train, reckon Peter Newman and Rob Salter of Curtin
University in Australia.

Other assumptions may also need revising. Governments throughout the
rich world rely on tax from fuel; across the EU, transport fuel taxes
account for 1.4% of GDP, and the figure is a good bit higher in some
countries. Revenues are already falling because of efficient cars.
They could plummet further if car use keeps dropping.

Cities that bank on parking fees, fines and road tolls may have to
find other ways to balance the books. Plans for attracting private
investment in roads may need reconsidering. In March 2012 David
Cameron, Britain’s prime minister, called for private investment in
the road network to increase capacity. Such schemes may be viable—but
not if based on a payment model that assumes ever-increasing use.

Environmentalists, though, should be cheering all the way to the
scrapyard. The International Energy Agency in 2009 projected an
average annual increase in global transport-energy demand of 1.6%
between 2007 and 2030, though this represents a slowing from earlier
growth. Past improvements in vehicle efficiency in America have often
been negated by increases in the power and weight of cars, leaving
fuel economy constant. Road transport accounts for around 23% of
polluting carbon emissions in the OECD; an absolute decline in driving
could help change that.

The possibility of reaching “peak car” is most evident in the rich
world. But emerging-world cities may reach a similar state earlier in
their development, reckons David Metz of University College London.

Non-OECD countries have higher levels of vehicle ownership now than
OECD countries did at similar income levels. This is because their
transport infrastructure has developed faster than it did in richer
countries, cars are cheaper in real terms and urbanisation is
happening faster.

Since car use is growing so fast—and urban planning lags behind—cities
in poorer countries could hit the “sprawl wall” sooner than those in
the rich world did, reckons Mr Newman. Space is already at a premium
in dense centres such as Jakarta, where the number of cars is growing
ten times faster than the roads available for them to roll on.

Some municipalities in the developing world are already planning for
less car use, notably by deploying urban rail systems. The Shanghai
metro, mostly built since 2000, ferries 8m people a day and covers 80%
of the city. Eighteen Indian cities and several Middle Eastern ones
are designing urban rail networks.

Roads are far from empty. In many countries traffic levels have
continued rising because population growth has compensated for
declining distances driven per person. On many roads peak-time
congestion will be a problem demography cannot defuse.

But after 50 years of car culture, culture may finally be changing the
car. Gone is the nostalgia of “American Graffiti”. “Cosmopolis”,
released in 2012, also features a cocky young man deeply involved with
his car; but it is a near stationary limousine that constrains and
isolates him far more than it enhances his possibilities. “I’m looking
for more,” he protests during his endless journey across Manhattan.
The world’s once and future car-owners are increasingly inclined to
agree.
http://www.economist.com/node/21563280
Ads
  #2  
Old September 26th 12, 12:47 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
John Benn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 865
Default Bye bye motor vehicles

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

snipped

Wrong newsgroup Tom.

  #3  
Old September 26th 12, 09:01 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Squashme
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,146
Default Bye bye motor vehicles

On Sep 26, 12:47*pm, "John Benn" wrote:
"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message

...

snipped

Wrong newsgroup Tom.


Quite a lot of motorists here. Could be of interest to them.
  #4  
Old September 26th 12, 09:30 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
Dave - Cyclists VOR
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,703
Default Bye bye motor vehicles

On 26/09/2012 21:01, Squashme wrote:
On Sep 26, 12:47 pm, "John Benn" wrote:
"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message

...

snipped

Wrong newsgroup Tom.


Quite a lot of motorists here. Could be of interest to them.


Try uk.rec.fairytales

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton, of Lancaster
University, wrote in an interim assessment of the Understanding Walking
and Cycling study. "For them, cycling is a bit embarrassing, they fail
to see its purpose, and have no interest in integrating it into their
lives, certainly on a regular basis."
  #5  
Old September 27th 12, 10:01 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling,uk.rec.driving
tim.....
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 40
Default Bye bye motor vehicles


"Squashme" wrote in message
...
On Sep 26, 12:47 pm, "John Benn" wrote:
"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message

...

snipped

Wrong newsgroup Tom.


Quite a lot of motorists here. Could be of interest to them.


I doubt it.

They guy might have had a point, but if he did I gave up reading his long
rambling post long before I got to it.

I suspect that I am not alone

tim







  #6  
Old September 27th 12, 10:22 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mrcheerful[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,662
Default Bye bye motor vehicles

tim..... wrote:
"Squashme" wrote in message
...
On Sep 26, 12:47 pm, "John Benn" wrote:
"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message

...

snipped

Wrong newsgroup Tom.


Quite a lot of motorists here. Could be of interest to them.


I doubt it.

They guy might have had a point, but if he did I gave up reading his
long rambling post long before I got to it.

I suspect that I am not alone

tim


he probably gets paid by the word, I fell asleep before the second
paragraph.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another pollution from motor vehicles warning. Doug[_10_] UK 43 April 29th 11 09:51 AM
Encounters with Vehicles iAmVincent Unicycling 6 December 17th 08 04:06 AM
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 0 May 7th 07 04:15 PM
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! Mike Vandeman Social Issues 0 May 7th 07 04:15 PM
[OT] Tracked vehicles John Hearns UK 9 September 16th 05 10:10 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.