New Tactical Cycling Maneuver

On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 18:49:18 -0700 (PDT), Sir Ridesalot
wrote:

On Saturday, 3 October 2020 21:08:29 UTC-4, John B. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 15:42:59 -0500, AMuzi wrote:

On 10/3/2020 3:36 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/2/2020 6:41 PM, wrote:
The M-16 and AR-15 rifles use .223 and/or 5.56 NATO
rounds. Not a round designed for mile long sniper shots.
Its a small (22!!!!!) round designed to maximize internal
injuries at medium range. Where most army infantry
fighting occurs.

Exactly. What a weird thing to become a fashion item!



.223 pretty much displaced .308 and 30.06 which put a lot
more impact on target.

If .50cal became as popular as .223 you'd bitch about that too

Back in the day a .58 caliber rifled musket was considered with
considerable trepidation.
--
Cheers,

John B.

My .58 caliber Hawken muzzle loading rifle can bring down a Grizzly bear or other North American large game.

Then again, according the Guiness Book of World Records a native Amerindian woman killed a grizzly bear from, iirc, three feet away when she shot it with a .22 caliber long rifle cartridge. That was a woman with lots of grit.

Cheers

Or perhaps a very slow runner :-)

But never mind the .22, a guy named Fraser Graham killed a wounded
adult grizzly, that attacked him, with a knife.
--
Cheers,

John B.

On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:15:59 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 7:56:29 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:23:46 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


Now it doesn't matter what you think you know. You simply have no
control over what someone wants to buy unless the reason is to
provably do harm to another human in the immediate future. Your
pretending that a "survivalist" intends to shoot people is far more
paranoia than he has.
Lol, it is a major topic of conversation on their lists.
Yet not one of them has a workable plan to survive the forthcoming
zombie apocalypse.
Tell us how you know what survivalists talk about you moronic fool. You
have police beating up women in front of their children because she
isn't isn't wearing a mask on her own property
Oh dear, with comprehension skills like that, no wonder you seen as
stupid.
and some son of a bitch
like you is talking about American survivalists?
Because they don't keep to the US survival nut newsgroups and wander into
the global newsgroup to share their "leet' knowledge, just like you do.
You are sick beyond
repair. Australia has LONG ago gone over to the dark side and every
posting you make proves it.
Gone over? Where we every on the other side, Oh wait, of course,
Australia is on the other side of the Pacific Ocean to you.
Shouldn't you be out advocating the police using clubs on people that do not wear masks? http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649...fgdFBn2yq1vDXM The important part of that beyond actual research showing that masks have no effect EVEN ON BACTERIAL infections is "Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them"

Wearing masks while exercising which appears to be becoming popular can and will kill you. It causes a condition called hypercapnia which is the collapsing of the lung's alveoli and a generally slow and painful death similar to Emphysema but no one ever accused the Aussies of knowing anything that they were doing before they took actions that made matters far worse than they were.

On 10/4/2020 11:05 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:15:59 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 7:56:29 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:23:46 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


Now it doesn't matter what you think you know. You simply have no
control over what someone wants to buy unless the reason is to
provably do harm to another human in the immediate future. Your
pretending that a "survivalist" intends to shoot people is far more
paranoia than he has.
Lol, it is a major topic of conversation on their lists.
Yet not one of them has a workable plan to survive the forthcoming
zombie apocalypse.
Tell us how you know what survivalists talk about you moronic fool. You
have police beating up women in front of their children because she
isn't isn't wearing a mask on her own property
Oh dear, with comprehension skills like that, no wonder you seen as
stupid.
and some son of a bitch
like you is talking about American survivalists?
Because they don't keep to the US survival nut newsgroups and wander into
the global newsgroup to share their "leet' knowledge, just like you do.
You are sick beyond
repair. Australia has LONG ago gone over to the dark side and every
posting you make proves it.
Gone over? Where we every on the other side, Oh wait, of course,
Australia is on the other side of the Pacific Ocean to you.
Shouldn't you be out advocating the police using clubs on people that do not wear masks? http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649...fgdFBn2yq1vDXM The important part of that beyond actual research showing that masks have no effect EVEN ON BACTERIAL infections is "Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them"

So much wisdom is wasted here! Your orange hero is now being seen
wearing a mask. You need to phone him and set him straight!


--
- Frank Krygowski

On Sun, 4 Oct 2020 21:28:17 -0400, Frank Krygowski
wrote:

On 10/4/2020 11:05 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:15:59 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 7:56:29 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:23:46 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


Now it doesn't matter what you think you know. You simply have no
control over what someone wants to buy unless the reason is to
provably do harm to another human in the immediate future. Your
pretending that a "survivalist" intends to shoot people is far more
paranoia than he has.
Lol, it is a major topic of conversation on their lists.
Yet not one of them has a workable plan to survive the forthcoming
zombie apocalypse.
Tell us how you know what survivalists talk about you moronic fool. You
have police beating up women in front of their children because she
isn't isn't wearing a mask on her own property
Oh dear, with comprehension skills like that, no wonder you seen as
stupid.
and some son of a bitch
like you is talking about American survivalists?
Because they don't keep to the US survival nut newsgroups and wander into
the global newsgroup to share their "leet' knowledge, just like you do.
You are sick beyond
repair. Australia has LONG ago gone over to the dark side and every
posting you make proves it.
Gone over? Where we every on the other side, Oh wait, of course,
Australia is on the other side of the Pacific Ocean to you.
Shouldn't you be out advocating the police using clubs on people that do not wear masks? http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649...fgdFBn2yq1vDXM The important part of that beyond actual research showing that masks have no effect EVEN ON BACTERIAL infections is "Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them"

So much wisdom is wasted here! Your orange hero is now being seen
wearing a mask. You need to phone him and set him straight!

And... of the nations with a population of 200 million, or more, the
U.S. ranks first in number of cases and deaths and on a per capita
basis is second only to Brazil who is ahead by 1% in the cases per
capita race and 6% in the deaths per capita group.

Keep up the good work and make "America First"!
--
Cheers,

John B.

On Sunday, October 4, 2020 at 6:28:22 PM UTC-7, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 10/4/2020 11:05 AM, Tom Kunich wrote:
On Saturday, October 3, 2020 at 5:09:46 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 10:15:59 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Friday, October 2, 2020 at 7:56:29 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 15:23:46 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


Now it doesn't matter what you think you know. You simply have no
control over what someone wants to buy unless the reason is to
provably do harm to another human in the immediate future. Your
pretending that a "survivalist" intends to shoot people is far more
paranoia than he has.
Lol, it is a major topic of conversation on their lists.
Yet not one of them has a workable plan to survive the forthcoming
zombie apocalypse.
Tell us how you know what survivalists talk about you moronic fool. You
have police beating up women in front of their children because she
isn't isn't wearing a mask on her own property
Oh dear, with comprehension skills like that, no wonder you seen as
stupid.
and some son of a bitch
like you is talking about American survivalists?
Because they don't keep to the US survival nut newsgroups and wander into
the global newsgroup to share their "leet' knowledge, just like you do..
You are sick beyond
repair. Australia has LONG ago gone over to the dark side and every
posting you make proves it.
Gone over? Where we every on the other side, Oh wait, of course,
Australia is on the other side of the Pacific Ocean to you.
Shouldn't you be out advocating the police using clubs on people that do not wear masks? http://12160.info/m/blogpost?id=2649...fgdFBn2yq1vDXM The important part of that beyond actual research showing that masks have no effect EVEN ON BACTERIAL infections is "Mandating masks has not kept death rates down anywhere. The 20 U.S. states that have never ordered people to wear face masks indoors and out have dramatically lower COVID-19 death rates than the 30 states that have mandated masks. Most of the no-mask states have COVID-19 death rates below 20 per 100,000 population, and none have a death rate higher than 55. All 13 states that have death rates higher 55 are states that have required the wearing of masks in all public places. It has not protected them"
So much wisdom is wasted here! Your orange hero is now being seen
wearing a mask. You need to phone him and set him straight!

It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science" and then deny it.

On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:32:40 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science" and
then deny it.

Yerr Frank. Tommy's new science is just so superior to that other old
fashioned peer tested science. And it is so much easier to follow and you
don't have to worry about any details and exceptions.

On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:32:40 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science" and
then deny it.
Yerr Frank. Tommy's new science is just so superior to that other old
fashioned peer tested science. And it is so much easier to follow and you
don't have to worry about any details and exceptions.
Unlike you I don't get my "science" off of the front page of the Canberra Times. I actually work for it. Go back in your closet and beat off as usual.

On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:01:56 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:32:40 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science" and
then deny it.
Yerr Frank. Tommy's new science is just so superior to that other old
fashioned peer tested science. And it is so much easier to follow and
you don't have to worry about any details and exceptions.
Unlike you I don't get my "science" off of the front page of the
Canberra Times. I actually work for it. Go back in your closet and
beat off as usual.

Lol, no argument to be made, as usual, so you revert to lame insults.
Plenty of people 'work for science", but not many of them understand what
they are doing and why. Your comments fit into the former class.
Or did you already know why you keep a a paper bag in a first aid kits?

On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 4:55:42 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:01:56 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:32:40 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science" and
then deny it.
Yerr Frank. Tommy's new science is just so superior to that other old
fashioned peer tested science. And it is so much easier to follow and
you don't have to worry about any details and exceptions.
Unlike you I don't get my "science" off of the front page of the
Canberra Times. I actually work for it. Go back in your closet and
beat off as usual.
Lol, no argument to be made, as usual, so you revert to lame insults.
Plenty of people 'work for science", but not many of them understand what
they are doing and why. Your comments fit into the former class.
Or did you already know why you keep a a paper bag in a first aid kits?
I have given my CDC references. Why don't you explain where you get your idiotic and dopey responses if not from a far far left wing media in a country in which the police will beat a mother with billy clubs in front of her children for not wearing a mask in her own front yard? Believe me, you NEVER want to meet me.

On Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:29:42 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Tuesday, October 6, 2020 at 4:55:42 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2020 14:01:56 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:

On Monday, October 5, 2020 at 4:22:52 PM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 09:32:40 -0700, Tom Kunich wrote:


It is almost comical about how you claim to "follow the science"
and then deny it.
Yerr Frank. Tommy's new science is just so superior to that other
old fashioned peer tested science. And it is so much easier to
follow and you don't have to worry about any details and exceptions.
Unlike you I don't get my "science" off of the front page of the
Canberra Times. I actually work for it. Go back in your closet and
beat off as usual.
Lol, no argument to be made, as usual, so you revert to lame insults.
Plenty of people 'work for science", but not many of them understand
what they are doing and why. Your comments fit into the former class.
Or did you already know why you keep a a paper bag in a first aid kits?
I have given my CDC references. Why don't you explain where you get your
idiotic and dopey responses if not from a far far left wing media in a
country in which the police will beat a mother with billy clubs in front
of her children for not wearing a mask in her own front yard? Believe
me, you NEVER want to meet me.

I take it you've run out of street trash to try an resell on Craig's
List!.

Now, do you know why you slip a paper bag into your first aid kit? The
hint is, it is all to do with the range of CO2 that humans have evolved
to live with.