|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant
construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) https://patch.com/florida/southtampa...line-bicycling I'm sure things can be very difficult for an independent local shop. I wonder about Andrew's experience with such pressures. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On 1/27/2020 10:22 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) https://patch.com/florida/southtampa...line-bicycling I'm sure things can be very difficult for an independent local shop. I wonder about Andrew's experience with such pressures. Not news. The past few years have been absolutely brutal to my industry. That said, individual dealers are each a subset of 'the bicycle business' and have their own individual strengths, advantages, challenges and burdens. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:00:41 UTC-5, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. Perhaps in Florida it's because of drivers who plow into a group of 15+ bicyclist of which 2 die of injuries; and the driver doesn't even get charged with reckless driving although she was 10+ MPH over the speed limit and was not looking at the road in front of her at the time she hit them? It's talked about in t his thread. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ch/5abS9erOsto I think a big part of many giving up bicycling on roads is the perceived dangers posed by distracted drivers and the extremely lenient sentences those drivers get if they hit or hit and kill a bicyclist. Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. Cheers |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On Mon, Jan 27 2020, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. I'm a fan of the distracted driving laws in Ontario and wish they were more widespread. I frequently see people texting and driving here in PA. In Ontario the first conviction for distracted driving is a $1k fine and a 3-day suspension, the second is $2k and a 7-day suspension, and third is $3k and a 30-day suspension. https://www.ontario.ca/page/distracted-driving -- |)|/ Ryan Kavanagh | GPG: 4E46 9519 ED67 7734 268F |\|\ https://rak.ac | BD95 8F7B F8FC 4A11 C97A |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On 1/27/2020 2:01 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:00:41 UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. Perhaps in Florida it's because of drivers who plow into a group of 15+ bicyclist of which 2 die of injuries; and the driver doesn't even get charged with reckless driving although she was 10+ MPH over the speed limit and was not looking at the road in front of her at the time she hit them? It's talked about in t his thread. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ch/5abS9erOsto I think a big part of many giving up bicycling on roads is the perceived dangers posed by distracted drivers and the extremely lenient sentences those drivers get if they hit or hit and kill a bicyclist. Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. I suspect a reason for drops in cycling is perceived dangers, but I don't think it's specifically connected with light sentences for offending motorists. I say that because in the U.S. (and I suppose in Canada) there never was a time when motorists were adequately punished for their offenses. I think a big change has been the never-ending push for "Safe!" separate facilities, with the unavoidable implication that ordinary streets cannot possibly be "safe." My understanding is that the big bike companies - especially Trek, IIRC - are strongly behind this facility push. If so, it's a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot. It would be much more sensible to put out publicity proving that bicycling on most ordinary roads is actually quite safe, and very beneficial. It can also be very useful. I've noticed a change in our bike club. ISMT a high percentage of people who have joined in the past five years strongly prefer to ride on trails. They'll drive 50 miles to some distant trail, off load bikes to ride back and forth on the trail, and consider it a big adventure. I'd consider it a long drive followed by a boring ride. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On 1/27/2020 1:01 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote:
On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:00:41 UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. Perhaps in Florida it's because of drivers who plow into a group of 15+ bicyclist of which 2 die of injuries; and the driver doesn't even get charged with reckless driving although she was 10+ MPH over the speed limit and was not looking at the road in front of her at the time she hit them? It's talked about in t his thread. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ch/5abS9erOsto I think a big part of many giving up bicycling on roads is the perceived dangers posed by distracted drivers and the extremely lenient sentences those drivers get if they hit or hit and kill a bicyclist. Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. One might hold that USA is too lenient for inattentive automobile pilots (and I'd agree). Then there's CH, a different culture entirely! https://www.ticinonews.ch/svizzera/4...ni-di-prigione German tourist cycling in Switzerland dumps his bike, breaking a rib. Swiss police track him down and fine him 150 Swiss Francs for 'not being in control of vehicle' on public roads. He won't pay and takes the two days in jail instead. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 12:06:18 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 1/27/2020 2:01 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:00:41 UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. Perhaps in Florida it's because of drivers who plow into a group of 15+ bicyclist of which 2 die of injuries; and the driver doesn't even get charged with reckless driving although she was 10+ MPH over the speed limit and was not looking at the road in front of her at the time she hit them? It's talked about in t his thread. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ch/5abS9erOsto I think a big part of many giving up bicycling on roads is the perceived dangers posed by distracted drivers and the extremely lenient sentences those drivers get if they hit or hit and kill a bicyclist. Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. I suspect a reason for drops in cycling is perceived dangers, but I don't think it's specifically connected with light sentences for offending motorists. I say that because in the U.S. (and I suppose in Canada) there never was a time when motorists were adequately punished for their offenses. I think a big change has been the never-ending push for "Safe!" separate facilities, with the unavoidable implication that ordinary streets cannot possibly be "safe." My understanding is that the big bike companies - especially Trek, IIRC - are strongly behind this facility push. If so, it's a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot. It would be much more sensible to put out publicity proving that bicycling on most ordinary roads is actually quite safe, and very beneficial. It can also be very useful. I've noticed a change in our bike club. ISMT a high percentage of people who have joined in the past five years strongly prefer to ride on trails. They'll drive 50 miles to some distant trail, off load bikes to ride back and forth on the trail, and consider it a big adventure. I'd consider it a long drive followed by a boring ride. What kind of a trail? A trail-trail or a MUP? A lot of people are sick of battling car traffic and are heading toward gravel or off-road because it is more pleasant. It's not even a safety thing -- it's quality of life. And a lot of people around here will drive 40 miles to trail -- but it is real trail. https://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb9879366/p4pb9879366.jpg Or gravel in basically the same area: https://ridewithgps.com/ambassador_r...ney-to-bennett We do have some pretty MUPs in the middle of nowhere-ish, so people may drive out to those. Rain ride! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6CtssH35Mg There are, however, better gravel routes near the Banks Vernonia trail, e.g. http://www.omtm.cc/buxton-bacona-bonanza If I drive, I'm going there and not a MUP. -- Jay Beattie. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On 1/27/2020 5:24 PM, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 12:06:18 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: I suspect a reason for drops in cycling is perceived dangers, but I don't think it's specifically connected with light sentences for offending motorists. I say that because in the U.S. (and I suppose in Canada) there never was a time when motorists were adequately punished for their offenses. I think a big change has been the never-ending push for "Safe!" separate facilities, with the unavoidable implication that ordinary streets cannot possibly be "safe." My understanding is that the big bike companies - especially Trek, IIRC - are strongly behind this facility push. If so, it's a classic case of shooting oneself in the foot. It would be much more sensible to put out publicity proving that bicycling on most ordinary roads is actually quite safe, and very beneficial. It can also be very useful. I've noticed a change in our bike club. ISMT a high percentage of people who have joined in the past five years strongly prefer to ride on trails. They'll drive 50 miles to some distant trail, off load bikes to ride back and forth on the trail, and consider it a big adventure. I'd consider it a long drive followed by a boring ride. What kind of a trail? A trail-trail or a MUP? I should have said MUP. In our area in the past 5 - 10 years, the mountain bikers have sort of forked off into their own club. There are some members in common (I was one, for a while) but now those are very few. A lot of people are sick of battling car traffic and are heading toward gravel or off-road because it is more pleasant. It's not even a safety thing -- it's quality of life. I've absolutely come across people who say they ride only mountain bike trails because the roads are too dangerous. I don't know how common that motivation is, but it does exist. Keep in mind that this area is unlike anything I've encountered out west, including the Portland - Beaverton - Hillsville area. Due to early farm-based settlement, we're surrounded by a high density network of ex-farm roads. Terrain (at least, south and east) prevents a true grid (and adds interest), but it's a tangle that approximates a grid with less than a mile between intersections. Yes, some of those old roads are now nasty because they sprouted huge McMansion developments, or serve as rush hour cut-throughs for people avoiding traffic and stop lights. But five miles away from anywhere, we can easily find roads with daily traffic counts below 1000, and not a few below 500. One of our weekly club rides (on a mid-morning weekday, so almost entirely retirees) leaves a restaurant/bar and covers 25 to 30 miles of country roads chosen by the momentary whim of the ride leader. At each intersection, he makes a snap decision. He seldom duplicates his route, because there are countless choices. And a lot of people around here will drive 40 miles to trail -- but it is real trail. A few (very few) times I've driven a distance to explore some MUP I heard about, or to ride one with a newbie who needs near-total flat terrain. But such a shame to pass up all the other pleasant roads! About gravel: A few people I know bought "gravel bikes" recently. I suggested they'd be great for riding through Amish country maybe 40 miles north of here, where the many gravel roads have almost no traffic but buggies. I might enjoy that with (say) 32mm tires on my touring bike. But I really am reluctant to drive very far to do a ride. -- - Frank Krygowski |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Decline in bicycling?
On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:52:33 PM UTC, AMuzi wrote:
On 1/27/2020 1:01 PM, Sir Ridesalot wrote: On Monday, 27 January 2020 12:00:41 UTC-5, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2020 at 8:22:56 AM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote: Decline in bicycling? Gosh, how can that be, with the constant construction of new "safe" facilities? (Actually, as a facility skeptic, I think I can answer that question.) The article ties the drop in commuter ridership to the fear of traffic and the highest bicycle death rate in the nation. You are now treading in that area between perceived danger and actual danger. It may actually suck to ride on surface streets to commute to work in Tampa as opposed to riding on one of the MUPs or linear park trails, which typically don't get you where you need to go as a commuter. The more interesting question is why a drop if the roads were equally dangerous in 2017. We had a drop in PDX, but nothing has changed -- except maybe car traffic has gotten worse. What we need is a survey to find out why people who rode in 2017 aren't riding in 2019. It could be reasons totally unrelated to road conditions, e.g. working from home. -- Jay Beattie. Perhaps in Florida it's because of drivers who plow into a group of 15+ bicyclist of which 2 die of injuries; and the driver doesn't even get charged with reckless driving although she was 10+ MPH over the speed limit and was not looking at the road in front of her at the time she hit them? It's talked about in t his thread. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ch/5abS9erOsto I think a big part of many giving up bicycling on roads is the perceived dangers posed by distracted drivers and the extremely lenient sentences those drivers get if they hit or hit and kill a bicyclist. Distracted driving seems to be increasing yearly and the penalties for it if someone is hit are ridiculously light. One might hold that USA is too lenient for inattentive automobile pilots (and I'd agree). Then there's CH, a different culture entirely! https://www.ticinonews.ch/svizzera/4...ni-di-prigione German tourist cycling in Switzerland dumps his bike, breaking a rib. Swiss police track him down and fine him 150 Swiss Francs for 'not being in control of vehicle' on public roads. He won't pay and takes the two days in jail instead. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 The Fremdenpolizei are a law onto their own. The keep special rat-infested cells for illegal aliens. If you think I'm joking, ask the banker who hides your money in a numbered Swiss account. Seems to me that the US could do with an infusion of the Fremdenpolizei spirit. Andre Jute How can you have a nation if it doesn't have borders? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The decline of motoring | Simon Mason | UK | 10 | December 21st 11 01:55 AM |
Mountain Bikes Continue to Decline in Sales | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 1 | March 19th 09 07:56 PM |
Mountain Bikes Continue to Decline in Sales | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 0 | March 18th 09 11:59 PM |
OT -- Decline of a noble language: raise your hand if you're innocent | Andre Jute | General | 20 | February 29th 08 12:51 AM |
OT -- Decline of a noble language: raise your hand if you're innocent | Andre Jute | UK | 15 | February 29th 08 12:51 AM |