YCMIU: Cyclist rides into stationary Police car

On 11/04/2016 18:14, Nick wrote:

On 11/04/2016 12:43, JNugent wrote:
On 11/04/2016 11:46, Nick wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:39, JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2016 09:00, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3218841.html

'Police are investigating whether an injured cyclist was knocked
down by the opening door of a police car...'
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3220591.html

What a surprise. It looks to have been the fault of a psychopath.
Who'd have thought it..? ...

...says the troll who clearly doesn't know the meaning of the word
"whether".

Eh? I think it is our police force's penchant for dissembling that
should be commented upon.
If he hadn't been doored there would be no suggestion of it. If he had
been doored the police would report it as he hit a stationary car.

The earlier content informed the reader that the police were
*investigating* *whether* some very specific thing, in a very specific
circumstance, had happened.
That seems very clear, doesn't it?
Another poster commented upon it as though either the police were not
investigating anything or had concluded their investigation.

Yes I think those of us familiar with the real world and the police
style of press releases when they are at fault will interpret the
statement as a more reliable indicator of dooring than a normal guilty
plea at trial.

Trial?

What trial?

On 11/04/2016 19:50, JNugent wrote:
On 11/04/2016 18:14, Nick wrote:

On 11/04/2016 12:43, JNugent wrote:
On 11/04/2016 11:46, Nick wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:39, JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2016 09:00, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3218841.html


'Police are investigating whether an injured cyclist was knocked
down by the opening door of a police car...'
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3220591.html


What a surprise. It looks to have been the fault of a psychopath.
Who'd have thought it..? ...

...says the troll who clearly doesn't know the meaning of the word
"whether".

Eh? I think it is our police force's penchant for dissembling that
should be commented upon.
If he hadn't been doored there would be no suggestion of it. If he had
been doored the police would report it as he hit a stationary car.

The earlier content informed the reader that the police were
*investigating* *whether* some very specific thing, in a very specific
circumstance, had happened.
That seems very clear, doesn't it?
Another poster commented upon it as though either the police were not
investigating anything or had concluded their investigation.

Yes I think those of us familiar with the real world and the police
style of press releases when they are at fault will interpret the
statement as a more reliable indicator of dooring than a normal guilty
plea at trial.

Trial?

What trial?

A trial in the general sense.

Don't worry I doubt the police will be held accountable for their
actions in this instance. I mean if they can shoot a man in the head for
no more reason than he jumped over a ticket barrier and wore a heavy
coat there is no reason that they will be held to account here.

Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 14:02, JNugent wrote:

Your claim to have a degree (let alone several) is absolutely laughable.

But why tell you that?

You know it already.

And so does everyone else.

I don't know why? He seems clever enough to me. Could you explain your
reasoning?

'I don't like him!!!!!!'

--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))

Phil W Lee wrote:
Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen
considered Mon, 11
Apr 2016 15:59:09 +0100 the perfect time to write:

JNugent wrote:
On 11/04/2016 13:39, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 11/04/2016 10:40, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2016 13:24, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2016 11:47, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
JNugent wrote:
On 08/04/2016 09:00, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:

MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3218841.html

'Police are investigating whether an injured cyclist was knocked down
by the opening door of a police car...'
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3220591.html

What a surprise. It looks to have been the fault of a psychopath.
Who'd have thought it..? ...

...says the troll who clearly doesn't know the meaning of the word
"whether".

... says the idiot who wants accuracy when it suits him, but it's
'pedantry' the rest of the time.

But at the end of the day, you're a troll and the motoring newsgroups are
waiting for you to subscribe to them. Run along, now...

...says Glug the Troll, who doesn't understand the meanings of the words
"investigating" or "whether".

Who's 'Glug the Troll'?

You are.

Please provide evidence of this.

You have answered to the name more than once, quite recently.

You answer when we call you 'trolling spastic'.

Well, actually, when I can be bothered, I point out that I am a
troll (though everyone with an ounce of common sense knows that already).

I fixed that, and now respond to the corrected version.

Indeed, so any denials are ignored, as they rightly should be.

I suggest that everyone killfiles the idiot Nuglet to avoid being
killfiled for re-posting his tripe.

You may find it useful if you have something worthwhile to say in
future.

Most of us who would like to use this group for it's intended purpose
have already killfiled him a long time ago, and only see his trolling
when someone quotes it.

If everyone else kills him.. sorry, killfiles him, I shall follow suit.

--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))

On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 7:53:25 AM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3218841.html

That is just a few yards from where Doug Bollen lives.

On 12/04/2016 00:14, Tom Crispin wrote:

On Wednesday, April 6, 2016 at 7:53:25 AM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote:

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...-a3218841.html

That is just a few yards from where Doug Bollen lives.

Once again, I hope he wasn't involved (though of course, it has to be
somebody who is involved).

On 12/04/2016 13:34, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 22:12, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 14:02, JNugent wrote:

Your claim to have a degree (let alone several) is absolutely laughable.

But why tell you that?

You know it already.

And so does everyone else.

I don't know why? He seems clever enough to me. Could you explain your
reasoning?

'I don't like him!!!!!!'

If you're trying to imitate Nugent that was a very poor attempt. Clear,
to the point with coherent logic. He probably disapproves of the abuse
of the ! too.

Nah, I wouldn't really try to imitate him. It'd be difficult to, anyway.
That concerted air of superiority, despite losing every single argument?

That takes skill, that does.

But anyway, his reason for calling my educational qualifications into
question _is_ the mere fact that he doesn't like me. He has no other
reason to doubt it, since I have demonstrated knowledge of the law that
goes beyond what one could glean from a google search.


No, you haven't. Don't try to fool yourself.

On 11/04/2016 22:12, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 14:02, JNugent wrote:

Your claim to have a degree (let alone several) is absolutely laughable.

But why tell you that?

You know it already.

And so does everyone else.

I don't know why? He seems clever enough to me. Could you explain your
reasoning?

'I don't like him!!!!!!'


If you're trying to imitate Nugent that was a very poor attempt. Clear,
to the point with coherent logic. He probably disapproves of the abuse
of the ! too.

Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 22:12, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 14:02, JNugent wrote:

Your claim to have a degree (let alone several) is absolutely laughable.

But why tell you that?

You know it already.

And so does everyone else.

I don't know why? He seems clever enough to me. Could you explain your
reasoning?

'I don't like him!!!!!!'

If you're trying to imitate Nugent that was a very poor attempt. Clear,
to the point with coherent logic. He probably disapproves of the abuse
of the ! too.

Nah, I wouldn't really try to imitate him. It'd be difficult to, anyway.
That concerted air of superiority, despite losing every single argument?

That takes skill, that does.

But anyway, his reason for calling my educational qualifications into
question _is_ the mere fact that he doesn't like me. He has no other
reason to doubt it, since I have demonstrated knowledge of the law that
goes beyond what one could glean from a google search.
--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))

MrCheerful wrote:
On 12/04/2016 13:34, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 22:12, Anthony '****_Taker' Janssen wrote:
Nick wrote:
On 11/04/2016 14:02, JNugent wrote:

Your claim to have a degree (let alone several) is absolutely laughable.

But why tell you that?

You know it already.

And so does everyone else.

I don't know why? He seems clever enough to me. Could you explain your
reasoning?

'I don't like him!!!!!!'

If you're trying to imitate Nugent that was a very poor attempt. Clear,
to the point with coherent logic. He probably disapproves of the abuse
of the ! too.

Nah, I wouldn't really try to imitate him. It'd be difficult to, anyway.
That concerted air of superiority, despite losing every single argument?

That takes skill, that does.

But anyway, his reason for calling my educational qualifications into
question _is_ the mere fact that he doesn't like me. He has no other
reason to doubt it, since I have demonstrated knowledge of the law that
goes beyond what one could glean from a google search.

No, you haven't. Don't try to fool yourself.

And you actually believe that you're a reference, you thick ****?

--
john smith |MA (Hons)|MPhil (Hons)|CAPES (mention très bien)|LLB (Hons)
'It never gets any easier. You just get faster'
(Greg LeMond (1961 - ))