LeMond is lazy

Notice on this pic of Greg in 2004, that he isn't carrying anything on
his bike. Does he still expect someone to carry a spare tube for him? He's
in his 40's, but he looks like he's in his 60's. I've seen guys his age,
that look like Lance.

http://www.redmondcyclingclub.org/Ph...Mond%20at%20RA
MROD/slides/P7290006.html

That boy be big ! Must be at least 210 lbs. I saw a "similiar" picture of
Ron Keifel. Mmmm Donuts.
"Callistus Valerius" wrote in message
nk.net...

Notice on this pic of Greg in 2004, that he isn't carrying anything on
his bike. Does he still expect someone to carry a spare tube for him?
He's
in his 40's, but he looks like he's in his 60's. I've seen guys his age,
that look like Lance.


http://www.redmondcyclingclub.org/Ph...Mond%20at%20RA
MROD/slides/P7290006.html

Roy Scherer wrote:
That boy be big ! Must be at least 210 lbs. I saw a "similiar" picture of
Ron Keifel. Mmmm Donuts.
"Callistus Valerius" wrote in message
nk.net...

Notice on this pic of Greg in 2004, that he isn't carrying anything on
his bike. Does he still expect someone to carry a spare tube for him?
He's
in his 40's, but he looks like he's in his 60's. I've seen guys his age,
that look like Lance.


http://www.redmondcyclingclub.org/Ph...Mond%20at%20RA
MROD/slides/P7290006.html



Geez, the guy spend his entire teens and early adult years starving
himself (with the exception of a little ice cream that he was rumored
to enjoy from time to time) to maintain a competitive weight as a
competitive cyclist, and you expect him to worry about his weight now,
as if he's some blundering masters' fattie chasing after a delusion of
cycling greatness???

I don't give a damn if he hits 300#.

Scott wrote:

Geez, the guy spend his entire teens and early adult years starving
himself (with the exception of a little ice cream that he was rumored
to enjoy from time to time) to maintain a competitive weight as a
competitive cyclist, and you expect him to worry about his weight now,
as if he's some blundering masters' fattie chasing after a delusion of
cycling greatness???

There's no middle ground? It's an either/or situation?

I don't give a damn if he hits 300#.

Probably a good thing, at this rate.

R

Scott wrote:

Geez, the guy spend his entire teens and early adult years starving
himself (with the exception of a little ice cream that he was rumored
to enjoy from time to time) to maintain a competitive weight as a
competitive cyclist, and you expect him to worry about his weight now,
as if he's some blundering masters' fattie chasing after a delusion of
cycling greatness???

I don't give a damn if he hits 300#.



Dumbass -

Ya, that's ****ing great, the way so many of us Americans can't control
our appetites.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
Scott wrote:

Geez, the guy spend his entire teens and early adult years starving
himself (with the exception of a little ice cream that he was rumored
to enjoy from time to time) to maintain a competitive weight as a
competitive cyclist, and you expect him to worry about his weight now,
as if he's some blundering masters' fattie chasing after a delusion of
cycling greatness???

I don't give a damn if he hits 300#.



Dumbass -

Ya, that's ****ing great, the way so many of us Americans can't control
our appetites.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Restated, I don't give a damn if he hits 300#, because it means nothing
to the relevancy of his cycling legacy. Doesn't really mean much about
how lazy, or not, he is, either.

"Scott" wrote in message
oups.com...

Kurgan Gringioni wrote:
Scott wrote:

Geez, the guy spend his entire teens and early adult years starving
himself (with the exception of a little ice cream that he was rumored
to enjoy from time to time) to maintain a competitive weight as a
competitive cyclist, and you expect him to worry about his weight now,
as if he's some blundering masters' fattie chasing after a delusion of
cycling greatness???

I don't give a damn if he hits 300#.



Dumbass -

Ya, that's ****ing great, the way so many of us Americans can't control
our appetites.


thanks,

K. Gringioni.

Restated, I don't give a damn if he hits 300#, because it means nothing
to the relevancy of his cycling legacy. Doesn't really mean much about
how lazy, or not, he is, either.


Good point. Charlie Gaul was a bit rotund when he resurfaced and his legacy
was none the worse for it.

Scott wrote:

Restated, I don't give a damn if he hits 300#, because it means nothing
to the relevancy of his cycling legacy. Doesn't really mean much about
how lazy, or not, he is, either.

You don't believe there is a correlation between activity and the
amount of calories burned? One could say he's too lazy (inertia) to
stop the fork from hitting his mouth.

R

You mean like you can't control being gay?

Tom Kunich wrote:
You mean like you can't control being gay?

No, being an optimist and striving to be happy is a conscious decision.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.

R