Why are revlimiters uneven?

On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:22:39 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather


--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

On 20/05/2021 19:21, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993.Â* I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering?Â* What year was the rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?


--
There is something fascinating about science. One gets such wholesale
returns of conjecture out of such a trifling investment of fact.

Mark Twain

On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:10:12 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the notorious,
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:


They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?

He doesn't think. He TROLLS. Just like you don't think but feed the troll,
you natural idiot!

On 21/05/21 7:50 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:10:12 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the notorious,
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:


They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?

He doesn't think. He TROLLS. Just like you don't think but feed the troll,
you natural idiot!

Peeler's diet includes marine invertebrates and dead or crippled fishes.

On Fri, 21 May 2021 21:06:04 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay little
masochist, blabbered again:


He doesn't think. He TROLLS. Just like you don't think but feed the troll,
you natural idiot!

Peeler's diet includes marine invertebrates and dead or crippled fishes.

Yeah, very "impressive" ...your idiocy that is, you dumb gay little cyclist!
LOL

On 21/05/2021 10:06, Peter Keller wrote:
On 21/05/21 7:50 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:10:12 +0100, The Natural Idiot, the notorious,
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:


They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?

He doesn't think. He TROLLS. Just like you don't think but feed the troll,
you natural idiot!

Peeler's diet includes marine invertebrates and dead or crippled fishes.

Lol.

On Fri, 21 May 2021 06:10:12 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 20/05/2021 19:21, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993. I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering? What year was the rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

They didn't include flint tools or a leather saddle either.

Do you think that was a serious omission?

The rev limiter, yes. You make one mistake once in the life of the car and you lose the engine.

On Thu, 20 May 2021 21:22:39 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993.. I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering? What year was the rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

I noticed, but they tend to be a fraction of the price, which is why I've had 4 of them. £500 for a car with only 45K on the clock? Unheard of for anything decent.

On 21/05/21 9:27 pm, Peeler wrote:
On Fri, 21 May 2021 21:06:04 +1200, Peter Keller, the dumb gay little
masochist, blabbered again:


He doesn't think. He TROLLS. Just like you don't think but feed the troll,
you natural idiot!

Peeler's diet includes marine invertebrates and dead or crippled fishes.

Yeah, very "impressive" ...your idiocy that is, you dumb gay little cyclist!
LOL

Sometimes, to the detriment of fishermen, Peeler attacks fish caught on
lines or in nets, boring his way into the bodies and eating the fish
from the inside.

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 20 May 2021 21:22:39 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 20 May 2021 15:58:31 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 19/05/2021 19:50, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 11 May 2021 19:26:55 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 11/05/2021 18:52, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Thu, 06 May 2021 21:06:10 +0100, The Natural Philosopher
wrote:

On 06/05/2021 18:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
I did not have a rev limiter on my Renault Espace built in 1993.
I
broke the engine badly.

That shows what a stupid **** you are then

Why would anyone expect a car from 1993 not to have a limiter?

Because they were a stupid ****?

How am I stupid for expecting better engineering? What year was the
rev
limiter invented?

I think about 1760

So what?

So why the **** did Renault not include it in their car of a much later
vintage?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

I noticed, but they tend to be a fraction of the price,

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

which is why I've had 4 of them. £500 for a car with only 45K on the
clock?

Because the frogs are hopeless at designing cars.

Unheard of for anything decent.

Only the stupid keep buying such ****ed cars.