#1
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
I recently had a completely new (at least for me) experience: I wore out a helmet. Or at least I think I wore it out: there's a crack in the front of my trusty white Giro Atmos that I can't account for. The helmet's four years old, so I'm just putting this crack down to accumulated wear and tear. So how is this new? Well, it's the first time I've ever replaced a helmet before catastrophically destroying it through the medium of an epic crash. In other words, I've finally had a helmet die of old age. Who would have even thought such a thing possible? So lately I've been doing some helmet shopping, during which I have thought a lot-too much, perhaps-about helmets. Chose a Bell; what the Hell? |
Ads |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Ben Goren wrote:
:: :: What the aero shapes /do/ do is twist your head around when you :: hit the ground, possibly snapping your neck in extreme cases. The :: Citi is round and has no snag points (mounting brackets, rough :: finishes, oversized vents with sharp corners, etc.) It's also :: available in a day-glo orange. :: Is this based on theory or is there anything more? (not being critical or trying to incite - just stupidly curious) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Roger Zoul wrote:
Ben Goren wrote: What the aero shapes /do/ do is twist your head around when you hit the ground, possibly snapping your neck in extreme cases. The Citi is round and has no snag points (mounting brackets, rough finishes, oversized vents with sharp corners, etc.) It's also available in a day-glo orange. Is this based on theory or is there anything more? (not being critical or trying to incite - just stupidly curious) It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: http://www.helmets.org/ In particular, be sure to check out their recommendations for the 2007 season. The fact that the Citi is a Consumer Reports best buy doesn't hurt, either.... Cheers, b& -- EAC Memographer BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy ``All but God can prove this sentence true.'' ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Ben Goren wrote:
:: Roger Zoul wrote: :: ::: Ben Goren wrote: ::: :::: What the aero shapes /do/ do is twist your head around when :::: you hit the ground, possibly snapping your neck in extreme :::: cases. The Citi is round and has no snag points (mounting :::: brackets, rough finishes, oversized vents with sharp corners, :::: etc.) It's also available in a day-glo orange. ::: ::: Is this based on theory or is there anything more? (not being ::: critical or trying to incite - just stupidly curious) :: :: It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: :: :: http://www.helmets.org/ :: :: In particular, be sure to check out their recommendations for the :: 2007 season. :: :: The fact that the Citi is a Consumer Reports best buy doesn't :: hurt, either.... Thanks. I could not find on the Bell website any info on a day-glo orange helmet. Any leads? I'm going to check out CR next. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Ben Goren wrote:
It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: http://www.helmets.org/ I would suggest the rather more objective, scholarly and complete one of the Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation at http://www.cyclehelmets.org/ It has the advantage of not having easily provable complete nonsense stated as if it's fact. Pete. -- Peter Clinch Medical Physics IT Officer Tel 44 1382 660111 ext. 33637 Univ. of Dundee, Ninewells Hospital Fax 44 1382 640177 Dundee DD1 9SY Scotland UK net http://www.dundee.ac.uk/~pjclinch/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Roger Zoul wrote:
Ben Goren wrote: What the aero shapes /do/ do is twist your head around when you hit the ground, possibly snapping your neck in extreme cases. The Citi is round and has no snag points (mounting brackets, rough finishes, oversized vents with sharp corners, etc.) It's also available in a day-glo orange. Is this based on theory or is there anything more? (not being critical or trying to incite - just stupidly curious) It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: http://www.helmets.org/ In particular, be sure to check out their recommendations for the 2007 season. The fact that the Citi is a Consumer Reports best buy doesn't hurt, either.... Thanks. I could not find on the Bell website any info on a day-glo orange helmet. Any leads? My mistrake. The Bell Metro, which is the same shell with a different fitting system, comes in day-glo orange. The Citi comes in a bright yellow. The Metro is a slightly older model, but it's also the upscale version with special optional accessories like a fold-away mirror. Personally, I'd go for the Citi. It's $50 v $75, and I like the newer fitting system. I'm going to check out CR next. I definitely recommend you do. But do spend some time reading through the BHSI's stuff. They're clearly passionate about helmets, and they're constantly updating their site with new information. Frankly, I trust their opinion over that of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. If nothing else, the BHSI recommends everything the CPSC and CR do for safety, and more. Cheers, b& -- EAC Memographer BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy ``All but God can prove this sentence true.'' ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Peter Clinch wrote:
Ben Goren wrote: It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: http://www.helmets.org/ I would suggest the rather more objective, scholarly and complete one of the Bicycle Helmet Research Foundation at http://www.cyclehelmets.org/ It has the advantage of not having easily provable complete nonsense stated as if it's fact. Funny. That's exactly the way I'd describe BHRF. Their ``A helmet saved my life!'' page, for example, is completely the opposite of my own experience. This past fall, I was clipped by a car that passed me. I have no memory of the crash itself, and my memory of the rest of that afternoon until about the time I was released from the ER is spotty at best. I had a concussion and a broken elbow. The side of my helmet was crushed. I had a bit of road rash on my cheek. The CT scan, however, was clear, and by that evening there were no more signs of my concussion. There's no reason whatsoever to doubt that I'd have at least fractured my skull without the helmet. I know, the plural of ``anecdote'' is not data, and all that. But I was the unwilling subject of an experiment that directly contradicts their claims. And the thrust of their claims is that helmets only protect against some kinds of injuries, not all; that people are less likely to ride at all if they're required to own a helmet; and that idiots will -- as with antilock brakes -- get themselves into situations they never would have if they didn't have a helmet. Not a one of those arguments carries the slightest bit of weight with me. I'll keep my helmet on, thankyouverymuch. Cheers, b& -- EAC Memographer BAAWA Knight of Blasphemy ``All but God can prove this sentence true.'' ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 14:51:55 -0700, Ben Goren wrote:
This past fall, I was clipped by a car that passed me. I have no memory of the crash itself, Quick recap - you have no idea what actually happened, but you're certain that the helmet saved your life. Is that rational? How do you know what effect the helmet had if you don't even know what happened? There's no reason whatsoever to doubt that I'd have at least fractured my skull without the helmet. Not even the reason that skulls take five times the energy to fracture than helmets can absorb? I know, the plural of ``anecdote'' is not data, and all that. But I was the unwilling subject of an experiment that directly contradicts their claims. No, you were not. Please specify one single claim that is contradicted by the accident you don't remember anything about. And the thrust of their claims is that helmets only protect against some kinds of injuries, not all; You dispute that, do you? Your helmet is effective against (say) broken thumbs, is it? Not a one of those arguments carries the slightest bit of weight with me. Apparently so. Curiouser and curiouser. regards, Ian SMith -- |\ /| no .sig |o o| |/ \| |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Helmets
Ben Goren wrote:
It's mostly from the Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute at: http://www.helmets.org/ In particular, be sure to check out their recommendations for the 2007 season. Impressive! I was trying to be funny rhyming Bell,but that was such good info; I ****will**** get a Bell :-) - thanks for the link. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Helmets week on my new blog, a question regarding helmets and my blog. | 101bike | Racing | 7 | March 18th 06 03:14 AM |
Helmets & HSE | Richard | UK | 15 | January 10th 06 04:20 PM |
Helmets | Timo | UK | 101 | December 10th 05 05:47 PM |
Helmets helmets helmets and weird heads | Tamyka Bell | Australia | 3 | November 30th 04 11:25 AM |
Helmets | Peter Taylor | UK | 53 | February 10th 04 04:28 PM |