"He should have been arrested for being a gob****e "

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:06:06 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:08:39 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:51, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:06:28 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:39, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
gay ****wit

Thanks greatly for that excellent complimented flung out to me from
YOU.
Now please vomit out in my direction the further honour of being a
festering pustule on a weasel's rump.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a gay ****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Your response is yet again homosexual.

Thanks for the compliment.

So you admit to it?

Now please fart to me the further honour of worthless bag of filth.

You like to sniff farts?

Yes.
just for YOU.

Do mine smell nicer?

Like a skunk's.
Does that make you happier?

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a ****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.
Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.
As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a ****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on roads is better in a car.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you aren't poor).

--
A hand job a day keeps arthritis away.

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a ****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they
are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely
great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on
roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you
aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a ****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they
are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely
great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on
roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more stuff.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a pedestrian crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long since crossed, and they just sit on a red light. Who do they think they're going to run over? If they think they can't see pedestrians, why are they driving in the first place?

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you
aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

--
Beating your wife is like keying your own car.

On 26.04.2017 00:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of
being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a
****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they
are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely
great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on
roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more stuff.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a pedestrian
crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long since crossed, and
they just sit on a red light. Who do they think they're going to run
over? If they think they can't see pedestrians, why are they driving in
the first place?

I love stopping at red lights. It gives me an excuse to watch the
delicious miniskirted ladies sauntering by.

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you
aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

I do not have to justify myself to anyone. Especially not for the likes
of YOU. Intolerant sod who cannot bear to have other people with
different ideas and thoughts than YOURS.

On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:15:38 +0100, Peter Keller wrote:

On 26.04.2017 00:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of
being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a
****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they
are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely
great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on
roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more stuff.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a pedestrian
crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long since crossed, and
they just sit on a red light. Who do they think they're going to run
over? If they think they can't see pedestrians, why are they driving in
the first place?

I love stopping at red lights. It gives me an excuse to watch the
delicious miniskirted ladies sauntering by.

It's more fun to break the law, especially if the ladies in miniskirts scream and dart out of the way.

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you
aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

I do not have to justify myself to anyone. Especially not for the likes
of YOU. Intolerant sod who cannot bear to have other people with
different ideas and thoughts than YOURS.

So you don't have a reason then. I'll just have to assume you're poor.

--
Q: Why do women close their eyes during sex?
A: Because they can't stand to see a man having a good time!

James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:15:38 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 26.04.2017 00:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter
Keller wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment
coming from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of
being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a
****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR
eyes. After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You
think they are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an
extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability
to carry heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very
well if you can't afford a car or they haven't been invented
yet.
You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting
places under own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing
the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to
B on roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more
stuff.
Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of
traffic lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have
to stop for thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a
pedestrian crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long
since crossed, and they just sit on a red light. Who do they think
they're going to run over? If they think they can't see
pedestrians, why are they driving in the first place?

I love stopping at red lights. It gives me an excuse to watch the
delicious miniskirted ladies sauntering by.

It's more fun to break the law, especially if the ladies in
miniskirts scream and dart out of the way.
As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a
bicycle, I take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are
the ****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming
you aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

I do not have to justify myself to anyone. Especially not for the
likes of YOU. Intolerant sod who cannot bear to have other people
with different ideas and thoughts than YOURS.

So you don't have a reason then. I'll just have to assume you're
poor.

Assumes the **** poor delivery boy with no hot running water, 11 cats and
several parrots living in his hovel.
https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud

On 27.04.2017 05:37, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:15:38 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 26.04.2017 00:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment
coming
from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of
being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a
****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR
eyes.
After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think
they
are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely
great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability to
carry
heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very well if you
can't
afford a car or they haven't been invented yet.

You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting places
under
own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to B on
roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more
stuff.

Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of traffic
lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have to stop for
thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a pedestrian
crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long since crossed, and
they just sit on a red light. Who do they think they're going to run
over? If they think they can't see pedestrians, why are they driving in
the first place?

I love stopping at red lights. It gives me an excuse to watch the
delicious miniskirted ladies sauntering by.

It's more fun to break the law, especially if the ladies in miniskirts
scream and dart out of the way.

As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a bicycle, I
take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming you
aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

I do not have to justify myself to anyone. Especially not for the likes
of YOU. Intolerant sod who cannot bear to have other people with
different ideas and thoughts than YOURS.

So you don't have a reason then. I'll just have to assume you're poor.

I do not have to give a reason to YOU.
You can assume what you like.

On 27.04.2017 07:50, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Wed, 26 Apr 2017 10:15:38 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:
On 26.04.2017 00:12, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:05:33 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 25.04.2017 01:56, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 10:20:30 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 24.04.2017 07:07, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2017 10:14:16 +0100, Peter Keller
wrote:

On 23.04.2017 05:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:08:06 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 21:40, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sun, 16 Apr 2017 10:09:32 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 16.04.2017 11:50, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2017 10:03:09 +0100, Peter Keller

wrote:

On 15.04.2017 10:27, naazim palan wrote:
On Friday, April 14, 2017 at 10:25:29 AM UTC+1, Peter
Keller wrote:
On 13.04.2017 21:47, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:


****wit

Thanks extremely greatly for that excellent compliment
coming from
YOU
Now please accord to me the further esteemed honour of
being a
putrescent mass and a walking vomit.

It really is a very great compliment to be called a
****wit by
YOU.
Especially by YOU.
And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR
eyes. After all I ride a ****ing bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You
think they are
the
****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an
extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.


Why do you alter posts?
Is that the only way you can present an argument?

"As synonym for "psycholist' is '****wit'
OED, as quoted by Judith Smith.

Are you on speed?

Of course. I ride a bicycle.

My car goes faster.

So?

More speed.

Agreed.
I repeat, so?

Less time taken, more fun getting there, less effort, ability
to carry heavy/large objects with you. A bicycle is all very
well if you can't afford a car or they haven't been invented
yet.
You are only very slightly right.
I also want to have and do other enjoyable things; getting
places under own exhilarating power, wind in hair, experiencing
the elements etc.

Same here, but for leisure, in the countryside. Going form A to
B on roads is better in a car.

For me, usually no. You can speak for yourself, not me.

I stated facts, not opinions. Cars are faster, easier, carry more
stuff.
Less effort is for me a definite MINUS.
And I do not have to carry large/heavy objects very often.
And I see no particular virtue in getting to the next set of
traffic lights in one second rather than ten seconds. You have
to stop for thirty seconds anyway.

No, you're MEANT to :-)

Impatient ****wit.

No, I can think for myself. I see stupid drivers sat at a
pedestrian crossing when the only pedestrian for miles has long
since crossed, and they just sit on a red light. Who do they think
they're going to run over? If they think they can't see
pedestrians, why are they driving in the first place?

I love stopping at red lights. It gives me an excuse to watch the
delicious miniskirted ladies sauntering by.

It's more fun to break the law, especially if the ladies in
miniskirts scream and dart out of the way.
As for your comments about the kind of person who rides a
bicycle, I take that as a compliment as it comes from YOU.
And I have no interest in looking good in YOUR eyes.
After all I ride a bicycle.
And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are
the ****witted pits of humanity.
And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great
compliment.
We must be doing something right.

Poor people have to use a bicycle. But you can choose (assuming
you aren't poor).

That is not what you said above.
I will use a bicycle when I choose, which is usually.

You have yet to give a good reason for doing so.

I do not have to justify myself to anyone. Especially not for the
likes of YOU. Intolerant sod who cannot bear to have other people
with different ideas and thoughts than YOURS.

So you don't have a reason then. I'll just have to assume you're
poor.

Assumes the **** poor delivery boy with no hot running water, 11 cats and
several parrots living in his hovel.
https://www.gov.uk/report-benefit-fraud



The page does not give information on reporting benefit fraud for
someone living in Benin.