|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
I have never seen or been passed by, a car coming toward me or from behind me while I am walking on the pavement,nor have I seen a car driving along a pavement, or using a Zebra crossing. I have never had to leap out of the way of a pavement driven car either (unlike the dangerously ridden pavement bicycles that I frequently see and have encountered) Not happening to Mr Cheerful means it doesn't happen? Is the video made up? The lower frequency is likely in large part due physical constraints giving drivers fewer opportunities (perhaps you haven't noticed that many pavements have streetlamps that restict the width?), rather than from a lack of will. Oh, I have seen cars drive on the pavement as part of a longer journey. Certainly cars do sometimes mount pavements and park there, sometimes they use a bit of pavement to avoid a temporary obstruction, but they do not make their entire or significant parts of their journeys on pavements, not even the cars being driven by cyclists, although I do suspect that the worst driven cars probably have a cyclist at the wheel. You're slipping. Where is your usual "please sweep it under the carpet because this is a cycling newsgroup"? I brought the OP back on topic for the group. You mean that you've brought it back to your sad repetitive obsessive posts dissing cyclists. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
On 06.04.2017 08:37, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Prick. Thanks greatly for your excellent compliment. It really is a very great compliment to be called a prick by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a ****ing bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
On Thu, 06 Apr 2017 09:09:00 +0100, Bod wrote:
I have never seen or been passed by, a car coming toward me or from behind me while I am walking on the pavement,nor have I seen a car driving along a pavement, or using a Zebra crossing. I have never had to leap out of the way of a pavement driven car either (unlike the dangerously ridden pavement bicycles that I frequently see and have encountered) Not happening to Mr Cheerful means it doesn't happen? Is the video made up? The lower frequency is likely in large part due physical constraints giving drivers fewer opportunities (perhaps you haven't noticed that many pavements have streetlamps that restict the width?), rather than from a lack of will. Oh, I have seen cars drive on the pavement as part of a longer journey. Certainly cars do sometimes mount pavements and park there, sometimes they use a bit of pavement to avoid a temporary obstruction, but they do not make their entire or significant parts of their journeys on pavements, not even the cars being driven by cyclists, although I do suspect that the worst driven cars probably have a cyclist at the wheel. You're slipping. Where is your usual "please sweep it under the carpet because this is a cycling newsgroup"? I brought the OP back on topic for the group. You mean that you've brought it back to your sad repetitive obsessive posts dissing cyclists. Dunno who wrote it up there, but this reply is for him: cyclists SHOULD be on pavements out of the way of cars. -- Reality is only an illusion that occurs due to a lack of alcohol. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
Bod wrote:
On 05/04/2017 17:22, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: TMS320 wrote: Well, it can't be motorists because we have often been told that they never do this. http://www.roadhawk.co.uk/blog/impat...-on-pavements/ Like a cyclist would not jump from the road to the footpath if the wagon was blocking the road. BTW, the driving in the video was appalling, but I suspect unusual. Unusual? Only if you consider "3,000 incidents of reckless driving per month" unusual. Yes, unusual. Unless of course you have witnessed driving as in the video. Well, have you?? ................................................ Thought not ........... |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:16:57 PM UTC+1, wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I also see and encounter cyclists riding across Zebra crossings. Not illegal A Zebra crossing is a pedestrian crossing, if you are cycling across it you are not a pedestrian. Vehicle users including other cyclists if they are traveling along carriageway are not obliged to give you the priority that is granted by law to pedestrians. Amazing how many cyclists who pull this stunt get all aggrieved and aggressive when I apply the horn rather than the brakes as they think that they have the right to expect the traffic to stop like it should for pedestrians. G.Harman What law is the cyclist breaking? Why do you think you can assault another road user because you, incorrectly, believe they are breaking the law? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
wrote:
On Friday, April 7, 2017 at 8:16:57 PM UTC+1, wrote: On Wed, 5 Apr 2017 12:49:54 -0700 (PDT), wrote: I also see and encounter cyclists riding across Zebra crossings. Not illegal A Zebra crossing is a pedestrian crossing, if you are cycling across it you are not a pedestrian. Vehicle users including other cyclists if they are traveling along carriageway are not obliged to give you the priority that is granted by law to pedestrians. Amazing how many cyclists who pull this stunt get all aggrieved and aggressive when I apply the horn rather than the brakes as they think that they have the right to expect the traffic to stop like it should for pedestrians. G.Harman What law is the cyclist breaking? Why do you think you can assault another road user because you, incorrectly, believe they are breaking the law? Prick. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 9:37:38 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: wrote: On Wednesday, April 5, 2017 at 7:49:39 AM UTC+1, MrCheerful wrote: On 04/04/2017 21:58, TMS320 wrote: Well, it can't be motorists because we have often been told that they never do this. http://www.roadhawk.co.uk/blog/impat...-on-pavements/ I see and directly encounter cyclists riding on pavements every day, So do I, does that exempt motorists from the law? very few of them even slow down while negotiating/passing pedestrians. Yet you are still 200 times more likely to be killed by a car on the pavement than a bicycle\ I also see and encounter cyclists riding across Zebra crossings. Not illegal I have never seen or been passed by, a car coming toward me or from behind me while I am walking on the pavement, I have. nor have I seen a car driving along a pavement I have , or using a Zebra crossing I have . I have never had to leap out of the way of a pavement driven car either I have unlike the dangerously ridden pavement bicycles that I frequently see and have encountered) Certainly cars do sometimes mount pavements and park there and that's OK? , sometimes they use a bit of pavement to avoid a temporary obstruction And that's OK? , but they do not make their entire or significant parts of their journeys on pavements What percentage of your journey are allowed to make on the pavement? , not even the cars being driven by cyclists, although I do suspect that the worst driven cars probably have a cyclist at the wheel. Because that is the only way you can justify your childish prejudice? Prick. Reasoned argument, logically presented. Prick. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Cyclists can afford cars after all
Peter Keller wrote:
On 06.04.2017 08:37, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: Prick. Thanks greatly for your excellent compliment. ?It really is a very great compliment to be called a prick by YOU. Especially by YOU. And I have no ****ing interest in looking good in YOUR eyes. After all I ride a ****ing bicycle. And we all know what YOU think of bicyclists. You think they are the ****witted pits of humanity. And because it is YOU who think that, that is an extremely great compliment. We must be doing something right. Prick. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Imagine if all these cyclists were in cars | Alycidon | UK | 1 | October 8th 15 11:06 PM |
Cyclists 'almost as likely' to injure pedestrians as cars | David Lang | UK | 1 | September 4th 15 09:57 AM |
Deaths on the pavements Cyclists versus Cars | [email protected][_2_] | UK | 0 | January 24th 11 09:17 AM |
Cars give way for cyclists in Manchester | Mark Thompson | UK | 1 | January 29th 07 04:21 PM |
Priority to be given to pedestrians and cyclists over cars? | Richard Bates | UK | 23 | October 31st 03 12:11 AM |