A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Flat repair



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old August 17th 18, 12:54 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Duane[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,546
Default Flat repair

wrote:
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 12:09:35 PM UTC-7, AMuzi wrote:
On 8/15/2018 12:39 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, August 15, 2018 at 12:26:14 AM UTC-7, news18 wrote:
On 14/08/18 08:48,
wrote:
Obviously you like carrying around two tubes, a patch kit, two CO2
cartridges and a filler and a mini-pump because it seems romantic to you.

Speaking of weight, just how heavier are these tubeless systems compared
to the old tyre and tube system.

You are perfectly free to feel that the same technology used on every
other rubber tired vehicle in the world is not suited to bicycles but
if you're going to argue, don't use inadequate responses like "lock
you in to their products"
or "testing procedures are only for very narrow test conditions."
when this isn't the case at all. It is far easier to test bicycle
tire performance than those of a motorcycles.
+++
How many of these "every other rubber tyred vehcicles" are not driven by
an ICE or similar power plant. P.S. you can leave out shopping trolleys.
.

Why are you arguing this? Tubeless tires are missing the weight of a
tube. What's more, because the sealant is so reliable you can use
lighter racing-style tires rather than armored tires such as the
Gatorskins or the others of similar construction. The flat tests I
presented earlier was a guy riding Continental 4000's - a racing tire
that has minimal rolling resistance in the tests.


People like tubeless for some applications where they make
sense. Other people gave up on them in other applications. I
don't feel strongly either way but they are certainly no
panacea.

Regarding weight, at least for road sizes, you're using a
heavier rim liner and a heavier valve assembly plus 55~60
grams of latex to omit a 60~65 gram tube. There may be a
weight savings but it can't be significant.

People like what they like because they like it. That's
fine, and argument enough. I don't see a compelling reason
to change, certainly not from 300g tubulars. YMMV, and in
your particular case it does.

p.s. I drove a wire-wheeled car, the last 8 years with the
latest hi-zoot Pirellis and matching tubes. Worked fine. Now
that I'm a grownup, I like pressed steel wheels with
tubeless, which are lighter.

--
Andrew Muzi
www.yellowjersey.org/
Open every day since 1 April, 1971


Well, I can't argue that people want to ride what they want to ride. I
just find it curious that they complain about flats and then won't change
over to a tubeless that doesn't get flats.


Huh? Last time I rode with a guy using tubeless we had to stop every 30k
to pump up his slow leak. I’m not saying tubeless suck but saying they
don’t flat is wrong.

--
duane
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible to repair a flat-spot (kerb hit) on rear rim? waldspirale UK 5 April 30th 07 10:32 PM
Pinch flat repair? MuniAddict Unicycling 8 March 11th 07 07:33 AM
Pinch flat repair? MuniAddict Unicycling 0 March 11th 07 02:36 AM
Pinch flat repair? zfreak220 Unicycling 0 March 11th 07 02:29 AM
Flat tire repair. Arne Recumbent Biking 13 August 19th 04 03:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.