OK Let's Play Nice

I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating manner.
Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group so we ought
to try and maintain a little more precision and a little less demeanor.

Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group
so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little
less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical group
so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a little
less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
little less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!


and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight
"contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
little less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with, not
the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!


and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight
"contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?

--
Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia
The weather is here, wish you were beautiful

Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
little less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with,
not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a
demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!


and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless
lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?


since when was calling a bull****ter on their bull**** "stalking"???
goddamned factless, useless, meaningless lightweight.

Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Sherman wrote:
"jim beam" wrote:
Tom Kunich wrote:
I realize that there are people here who posting in an irritating
manner. Not the least of whom is myself. But this is a technical
group so we ought to try and maintain a little more precision and a
little less demeanor.


1. it's the /type/ of demeanor that you're having a problem with,
not the fact that they have one - all people have some kind of a
demeanor.

2. you requesting "precision" is a joke - you can't even bother with
facts, let alone a dictionary.

[how's that for soliciting your intended type of response?]

Cool - the RBR bot engages the RBT bot in battle!


and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless
lightweight "contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?


I know which one is de more knowledgeable, but which one is de meaner?

Mark J.

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 19:17:31 -0700, jim beam wrote:



since when was calling a bull****ter on their bull**** "stalking"???

I also think you're a Jobst stalker, but I find it funny so I won't give
you **** about it. What matters is what you think, if everyone else thinks
you're a stalker but in your heart you know you aren't, then screw 'em.

"Tom Sherman" wrote in message
...
"jim beam" wrote:

and here we are, yet another factless, useless, meaningless lightweight
"contribution" from tom sherman. nothing changes.

Yes, without "jim beam" stalking Jobst Brandt, where would we be?

Come on Tom - Jim Beam stalks just about anyone that knows what they're
talking about. He is fixated in the belief that he alone walks on water.

So do I as long as it's frozen.

"Mark" wrote in message
. ..

I know which one is de more knowledgeable, but which one is de meaner?

There used to be a Jim Beam-type person on this group a score of years ago.
I finally met him in person and he was 5'2" talk with a heavy stutter and a
face that was made to throw pies at.