#11
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
On Nov 24, 6:08*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 23, 6:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Everything is on a timeline. Never to change your position on anything means that you are incapable of ever learning anything. Accepting that to be a given then means your statement that you can stand by every message you have ever posted *and can defend and justify everything that have ever said would indicate that you still have much yet to to learn and one of those things is that you cannot stand by every message you have ever posted *and cannot *defend and justify everything that you have ever said and in particular that very statement itself. Not so, since EVERYTHING is on a timeline, including the above statement. See ... I have just stood by what I said previously. Now you can appreciate why I am a genius and everyone else is an idiot. Just part of My Greatness! Go my son and sin no more. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota TOTAL CRAP ... that ludicrous gibberish is! Listen up you narcissistic cretin. Timeline is not even appropriately used in this particular context and most certainly does not provide you with an out . You simply cannot make one statement and then subsequently make another statement wjoich contradicts your initial statement and then irrationally assert that you can stand by everything that you say. In other words you cannon stand by diametrically opposed positions based on some fanciful notion of timeline ... you know it ... I know it and the readers know it. Your a genius??? If you can't even comprehend a concept this elementary, I beg to differ. Thanksgiving is coming. Can someone in in Ed's vicinity roast this turkey??? |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
JimmyMac wrote:
} } By his own admission, Dolan confirms what the readers already know ... } that he is jerk and proud of it. } Does anyone filter this guy out? It sure does improve the readability and content of arbr to do so. I am no fan of official censorship - ED can post all he wants, but it is little more than useless noise that "dolbies" out quite easily. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
"Luddite Wacko" wrote in message ... JimmyMac wrote: } } By his own admission, Dolan confirms what the readers already know ... } that he is jerk and proud of it. } Does anyone filter this guy out? It sure does improve the readability and content of arbr to do so. I am no fan of official censorship - ED can post all he wants, but it is little more than useless noise that "dolbies" out quite easily. Spoken like a true Luddite! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 24, 6:08 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 23, 6:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Everything is on a timeline. Never to change your position on anything means that you are incapable of ever learning anything. Accepting that to be a given then means your statement that you can stand by every message you have ever posted and can defend and justify everything that have ever said would indicate that you still have much yet to to learn and one of those things is that you cannot stand by every message you have ever posted and cannot defend and justify everything that you have ever said and in particular that very statement itself. Not so, since EVERYTHING is on a timeline, including the above statement. See ... I have just stood by what I said previously. Now you can appreciate why I am a genius and everyone else is an idiot. Just part of My Greatness! Go my son and sin no more. TOTAL CRAP ... that ludicrous gibberish is! Listen up you narcissistic cretin. Timeline is not even appropriately used in this particular context and most certainly does not provide you with an out . You simply cannot make one statement and then subsequently make another statement wjoich contradicts your initial statement and then irrationally assert that you can stand by everything that you say. In other words you cannon stand by diametrically opposed positions based on some fanciful notion of timeline ... you know it ... I know it and the readers know it. Your a genius??? If you can't even comprehend a concept this elementary, I beg to differ. Thanksgiving is coming. Can someone in in Ed's vicinity roast this turkey??? JimmyMac does not understand timelines - nor the passage of time itself. That is because he is stuck in a time warp. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
On Nov 25, 5:27*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 24, 6:08 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message .... On Nov 23, 6:18 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] Everything is on a timeline. Never to change your position on anything means that you are incapable of ever learning anything. Accepting that to be a given then means your statement that you can stand by every message you have ever posted and can defend and justify everything that have ever said would indicate that you still have much yet to to learn and one of those things is that you cannot stand by every message you have ever posted and cannot defend and justify everything that you have ever said and in particular that very statement itself. Not so, since EVERYTHING is on a timeline, including the above statement. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 5:27 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] JimmyMac does not understand timelines - nor the passage of time itself. That is because he is stuck in a time warp. I understand the concept of timelines just fine, but Dolan just does not comprehend that a timeline does not absolve him of his incessant self-contradiction and does not explain how he can possibly be stand by contradicting statements that he makes ... sometimes even in the very same thread!! There is one thing that can be counted on concerning the man. Dolan has aptly demonstrated that he cannot be taken at his word since his word constantly and whimsically changes. He flip flops so much that he should have been a politician. Oops, I stand corrected. Dolan is a societal parasite ... not an honorable member of the working class unless, of course, he has changed his position on that as well. The conundrum continues. Ed, I would consider allowing you to have the last word if you'd guarantee that it would be your last. As new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts. I have known for some time that unmoderated forums are the pits. I have only recently discovered that moderated forums are also the pits. Hence, a new fact leads to a new position as regards the relative worth of moderated forums as opposed to unmoderated forums. They are BOTH equally worthless! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
On Nov 25, 7:45*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 5:27 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] JimmyMac does not understand timelines - nor the passage of time itself.. That is because he is stuck in a time warp. I understand the concept of timelines just fine, but Dolan just does not comprehend that a timeline does not absolve him of his incessant self-contradiction and does not explain how he can possibly be stand by contradicting statements that he makes ... sometimes even in the very same thread!! *There is one thing that can be counted on concerning the man. *Dolan has aptly demonstrated that he cannot be taken at his word since his word constantly and whimsically changes. He flip flops so much that he should have been a politician. *Oops, I stand corrected. *Dolan is a societal parasite ... not an honorable member of the working class unless, of course, he has changed his position on that as well. *The conundrum continues. *Ed, I would consider allowing you to have the last word if you'd guarantee that it would be your last. As new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts. I have known for some time that unmoderated forums are the pits. I have only recently discovered that moderated forums are also the pits. Hence, *a new fact leads to a new position as regards the relative worth of moderated forums as opposed to unmoderated forums. They are BOTH equally worthless! Even though you have often stated that you are disinterested in facts and are all about opinion, I couldn't agree more with your opinion that ... "as new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts", but that begs the question ... when are you going to accept the axiom that as your position changes, standing by every message you have ever posted to Usenet is unachievable and untenable? I don't know why you continue to struggle with something this elementary, but allow me dissect this for you. It is a given that one cannot support opposing, contradictory positions. In order for one to stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet requires, as a precondition, that one cannot change one's position irrespective of the introduction of new facts. If and when new facts dictate a change in position, it also follows that when one changes one's position, one can no longer stand by one's previous position; and, consequently one cannot stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet. Why you are unable to comprehend or accept a concept so self- evident as to preclude debate, just baffles the mind ... and, you claim to be a genius??? The conundrum continues!!! V Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 7:45 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 5:27 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] JimmyMac does not understand timelines - nor the passage of time itself. That is because he is stuck in a time warp. I understand the concept of timelines just fine, but Dolan just does not comprehend that a timeline does not absolve him of his incessant self-contradiction and does not explain how he can possibly be stand by contradicting statements that he makes ... sometimes even in the very same thread!! There is one thing that can be counted on concerning the man. Dolan has aptly demonstrated that he cannot be taken at his word since his word constantly and whimsically changes. He flip flops so much that he should have been a politician. Oops, I stand corrected. Dolan is a societal parasite ... not an honorable member of the working class unless, of course, he has changed his position on that as well. The conundrum continues. Ed, I would consider allowing you to have the last word if you'd guarantee that it would be your last. As new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts. I have known for some time that unmoderated forums are the pits. I have only recently discovered that moderated forums are also the pits. Hence, a new fact leads to a new position as regards the relative worth of moderated forums as opposed to unmoderated forums. They are BOTH equally worthless! Even though you have often stated that you are disinterested in facts and are all about opinion, I couldn't agree more with your opinion that ... "as new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts", but that begs the question ... when are you going to accept the axiom that as your position changes, standing by every message you have ever posted to Usenet is unachievable and untenable? I don't know why you continue to struggle with something this elementary, but allow me dissect this for you. It is a given that one cannot support opposing, contradictory positions. In order for one to stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet requires, as a precondition, that one cannot change one's position irrespective of the introduction of new facts. If and when new facts dictate a change in position, it also follows that when one changes one's position, one can no longer stand by one's previous position; and, consequently one cannot stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet. Why you are unable to comprehend or accept a concept so self- evident as to preclude debate, just baffles the mind ... and, you claim to be a genius??? The conundrum continues!!! V The ways of genius like Ed Dolan the Great are clearly beyond the comprehension of so lowly a mortal as JimmyMac. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... Even though you have often stated that you are disinterested in facts and are all about opinion, I couldn't agree more with your opinion that ... "as new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts", but that begs the question ... when are you going to accept the axiom that as your position changes, standing by every message you have ever posted to Usenet is unachievable and untenable? I just saw this. I was so stunned I didn't keep reading. mk5000 "do you mind if I tell you how we do it in Canada?"--Samantha Bee |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Moderated Forums
On Nov 26, 8:09*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Nov 25, 7:45 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "JimmyMac" wrote in message .... On Nov 25, 5:27 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] JimmyMac does not understand timelines - nor the passage of time itself. That is because he is stuck in a time warp. I understand the concept of timelines just fine, but Dolan just does not comprehend that a timeline does not absolve him of his incessant self-contradiction and does not explain how he can possibly stand by contradicting statements that he makes ... sometimes even in the very same thread!! There is one thing that can be counted on concerning the man. Dolan has aptly demonstrated that he cannot be taken at his word since his word constantly and whimsically changes. He flip flops so much that he should have been a politician. Oops, I stand corrected. Dolan is a societal parasite ... not an honorable member of the working class unless, of course, he has changed his position on that as well. The conundrum continues. Ed, I would consider allowing you to have the last word if you'd guarantee that it would be your last. As new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts. I have known for some time that unmoderated forums are the pits. I have only recently discovered that moderated forums are also the pits. Hence, a new fact leads to a new position as regards the relative worth of moderated forums as opposed to unmoderated forums. They are BOTH equally worthless! Even though you have often stated that you are disinterested in facts and are all about opinion, I couldn't agree more with your opinion that *... "as new facts emerge, positions must change to take into account the new facts", but that begs the question ... when are you going to accept the axiom that as your position changes, standing by every message you have ever posted to Usenet is unachievable and untenable? *I don't know why you continue to struggle with something this elementary, but allow me dissect this for you. *It is a given that one cannot support opposing, contradictory positions. *In order for one to stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet requires, as a precondition, that one cannot change one's position irrespective of the introduction of new facts. *If and when new facts dictate a change in position, it also follows that when one changes one's position, one can no longer stand by one's previous position; and, consequently one cannot stand by every post one has ever made on Usenet. * Why you are unable to comprehend or accept a concept so self- evident as to preclude debate, just baffles the mind ... and, you claim to be a genius??? *The conundrum continues!!! The ways of genius like Ed Dolan the Great are clearly beyond the comprehension of so lowly a mortal as JimmyMac. Refusing to participate in this debate refuses to is not the way of genius, but rathe the way of the coward. Is this the best diversionary attempt that an alleged genius can muster? What we have here is typical Dolan CRAPOLA. When logic has Dolan backed squarely into a corner with no wiggle room, Dolan is on the brink of despair. His fragile ego cannot bear to publicly admit that he is wrong. Those who offer the most resistance when their wisdom, authority or intentions are called into question are often the very same persons who have an inherent inability to establish valid grounds to discredit others. Unwilling and/or unable to offer a rebuttal, Dolan delivers a gratuitous insult which only serves to demonstrate that his position is so weak that it has to be abandoned rather than defended. Regardless, the question still remains ... can Dolan stand by every post he has ever made or can he not? Why will Dolan not answer this question? Lack of an direct answer is tantamount to admission that he cannot stand be every post that he has ever made and will be taken as such. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moderated Forums | [email protected] | General | 2 | December 11th 08 12:22 AM |
Moderated Forums | Chris[_12_] | General | 8 | November 24th 08 04:47 AM |
Moderated Forums | Chris[_12_] | Mountain Biking | 4 | November 23rd 08 07:46 PM |
Moderated Forums | Chris[_12_] | Racing | 4 | November 23rd 08 07:46 PM |
Moderated Forums | JimmyMac | Techniques | 1 | November 22nd 08 10:38 PM |