|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 7, 9:42*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote:
On Feb 7, 6:54*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bob Berger" wrote in message ... [...] Rick: Will you PLEASE stop cluttering up this thread with facts. None of you confounded mountain bikers would know a fact if it jumped up and bit you in your dumb asses. Trails are for hikers, roads are for bikers. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a poor ****ed-up *******! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yawn, Ed, when you actually say something intelligent and relevant I am sure the world will actually end. *Are your meds giving out that you cannot keep your attention span together long enough to read? *No, Mike posted a article on a gentlemen who died while mt. biking implying strenuous exercise associated with mt. biking is bad, the medical profession disagrees with you and Mike. *If you are a healthy adult, regular strenuous exercise is good for your heart health - even more than simply strolling through the forest, which in its own right is enjoyable for many different reasons. *I made no value judgement as to mt. biking good or bad, simply your heart has no idea whether it is being "trained" or stressed while doing any number of back country activities such as trail running, cross country skiing, snow shoeing, and long distance power hiking. *I assume you look on these extreme sports type with disdain as they are not walking through the forest with their walker. *Most hikes I undertake are 10 plus miles and many push 20 miles usually at high elevation (the Sierra, I own a house at 6400 ft and go up from there) with extreme elevation gain. You may haul your over weight ass at a snails pace so your heart rate does not get above 75 bpm, but I and most of my hiking friends push ourselves. Maybe you hang out at the pub keeping your belly large, but I hang out with a largely uber fit crowd of hikers, runners (I have a couple of friends who are part of the ultra marathon crowd, 50 to 100 mile back country runs), cyclist (most road cyclist, but some mt. bikers), triatholoners, skaters who all crave (admitted addicted) to aerobic activities 4 to 6 times a week. *I just got back from a 2 hr dryland training (for skating) where we did these 15 minute drills that you feel like you want to throw up afterwards - this will greatly improve our skating fitness and we thrive on the pain. So I guess you and Mike will now lobby to keep all of those crazed uber fit trail users off the trails now. *Oh Minnesota, the great state where Santorium just won the Republican caucus. *Tell you what you stay in Minnesota, you fit the nut cases there. Enjoy, Rick- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You continue to miss the point, apparently deliberately. Mountain bikers claim that mountain biking is a healthful activity. But they fail to mention that it OFTEN results in a serious injury or even DEATH. That proves that their estimate of healthfulness is too high. In fact, it's dishonest to present the positive and ignore the negative. It's like the ads you see on TV for drugs. They talk about the benefits, and then say the side effects include "possible fatality" (they are required to say that, or they wouldn't). Mountain bikers aren't even that honest. Nor are you. In this newsgroup, only Ed and I tell the truth. QED Get it now? You left out the information from doctors about how dangerous mountain biking is. They are honest; you are NOT. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 8, 8:03*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Feb 7, 9:42*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote: On Feb 7, 6:54*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bob Berger" wrote in message ... [...] Rick: Will you PLEASE stop cluttering up this thread with facts. None of you confounded mountain bikers would know a fact if it jumped up and bit you in your dumb asses. Trails are for hikers, roads are for bikers. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a poor ****ed-up *******! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yawn, Ed, when you actually say something intelligent and relevant I am sure the world will actually end. *Are your meds giving out that you cannot keep your attention span together long enough to read? *No, Mike posted a article on a gentlemen who died while mt. biking implying strenuous exercise associated with mt. biking is bad, the medical profession disagrees with you and Mike. *If you are a healthy adult, regular strenuous exercise is good for your heart health - even more than simply strolling through the forest, which in its own right is enjoyable for many different reasons. *I made no value judgement as to mt. biking good or bad, simply your heart has no idea whether it is being "trained" or stressed while doing any number of back country activities such as trail running, cross country skiing, snow shoeing, and long distance power hiking. *I assume you look on these extreme sports type with disdain as they are not walking through the forest with their walker. *Most hikes I undertake are 10 plus miles and many push 20 miles usually at high elevation (the Sierra, I own a house at 6400 ft and go up from there) with extreme elevation gain. You may haul your over weight ass at a snails pace so your heart rate does not get above 75 bpm, but I and most of my hiking friends push ourselves. Maybe you hang out at the pub keeping your belly large, but I hang out with a largely uber fit crowd of hikers, runners (I have a couple of friends who are part of the ultra marathon crowd, 50 to 100 mile back country runs), cyclist (most road cyclist, but some mt. bikers), triatholoners, skaters who all crave (admitted addicted) to aerobic activities 4 to 6 times a week. *I just got back from a 2 hr dryland training (for skating) where we did these 15 minute drills that you feel like you want to throw up afterwards - this will greatly improve our skating fitness and we thrive on the pain. So I guess you and Mike will now lobby to keep all of those crazed uber fit trail users off the trails now. *Oh Minnesota, the great state where Santorium just won the Republican caucus. *Tell you what you stay in Minnesota, you fit the nut cases there. Enjoy, Rick- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You continue to miss the point, apparently deliberately. Mountain bikers claim that mountain biking is a healthful activity. But they fail to mention that it OFTEN results in a serious injury or even DEATH. That proves that their estimate of healthfulness is too high. In fact, it's dishonest to present the positive and ignore the negative. It's like the ads you see on TV for drugs. They talk about the benefits, and then say the side effects include "possible fatality" (they are required to say that, or they wouldn't). Mountain bikers aren't even that honest. Nor are you. In this newsgroup, only Ed and I tell the truth. QED Get it now? You left out the information from doctors about how dangerous mountain biking is. They are honest; you are NOT. Gotha! You and Ed score extremely high on the narcissistic scale and seem to be infatuated with each other. Instead of discussing issues, if some offers another opinion, you reflectively call people mt bikers and liars - meaning you lost the argument. Instead of labeling someone a mt. biker, let's evaluate whether or not most people would consider me one or not. We know you have a very low threshold, someone merely has to have once owned a mt. bike to be a mt. biker in your world - a world populated by only you and Ed I might add. I just did a quick query of my training dairy (Polar ProTrainer) and in 2011, I engaged in (or more accurately recorded heart rate information) 358 activities. There were many days where I would do 2 or 3 activities in a day, for example, snow shoe in the morning, ski mid-morning to the afternoon and then skate in the evening; or I might road ride, skate and than dryland train on the same day - each a distinct activity that lasted 1 or more hrs. The breakdown in order of frequency is 121 road cycling events (from 1 to 8 hr efforts), 102 speed skating events (1 to 3 hr efforts), 31 days hiking (1 to 12 hr efforts; did not back pack last year, 1st time in many years), 31 dryland/gym efforts (1 to 3 hr), 21 trail runs (1 to 2 hr), 20 snow shoeing efforts (1 to 4 hrs), 17 days skiing (2 to 8 hrs), 12 inline skate efforts (0.5 to 2 hrs - just picked these up late summer took some getting use to the boots), 3 mt. bike events (1, 1 and 4 hr efforts). I did not throw in a couple of kayak days in Lake Tahoe or some other excursions like walking miles in Manhattan with my daughter during the Christmas break. 34% and 28% of my effort was on a road bike and speed skating, respectively. In other words, these two activities made up 62% of those activities I recorded. Eight tenths of 1 percent was spent mt. biking. Hiking, trail running and snow shoeing made up 96% of my time in the back country with the 3 mt bike rides I did accounted for 4%. So now we can talk facts and decide what best characterizes my activity. Most folks (except maybe 2 people on the planet) would say I am a road cyclist and speed skater, and an outdoor enthusiast. I am sure you an Ed will show just how biased an uninteresting you are (you are more like Michelle Bachnann and Rick Santorium then I suspect you would want to be considered) would label me a mt. biker. All sports have inherent risk. Some more then others. Mt. biking falls in the middle. Orthopedic doctors from Barton Health Clinic in Tahoe and Kaiser in the Bay Area and a OS from Arizona (I have done a number of 100 mile road rides with him over the years) who own a major sport clinic in Arizona (oh, and none of the 4 drs. I talked to mt. bike) rank skiing (by leaps and bounds over other sports), football (concussions are a big deal these days), soccer, and running as their big four. They get smattering of basketball, cyclist (road and mt) and other active sports. They all consider the net health benefits of mt. biking outweigh the risk of injury. Death are not uncommon in skiing (several across the country each year) and between 600 to 700 road cyclist are killed each year by cars. Football is primarily a US Sport: From 1931 to 2006, the National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research has reported 1,006 direct and 683 indirect fatalities resulting from participation in all organized football (professional, college, high school, and sandlot) in the US.[6]; the yearly number of indirect fatalities has remained near 9.0 per year. I personally have known 5 people killed by cars while road cycling (dozens seriously hurt), 3 people killed backcountry skiing, 1 person kayacking, 3 people drowning while swimming (across a lake), 3 people died while hiking in the back country (mostly due to the elements but one slipped off a cliff - check out the books on deaths in Yosemite and Yellowstone - lots of hikers have died in those parks, i.e., slipping off hiking up to half dome), 2 mountaineering and from mt. biking. Now these were not al friends but include brief acquaintances. For my own part, as you see I am extremely active and the four most serious injuries I have ever suffered (all have happened in the last 4 yrs); I fractured my patella skiing April 2010 required surgery, back on my road bike with 10 weeks and the skiis 8 months later; modest strain to my right ACL 3 years ago while backpacking (needed PT and rest for 3 months); slight strain to my left ACL while skating 4 years ago (rest 1 month) and knocked off my road bike while descending Mt Wilson in Southern California by a stray dog, did not see a doctor but had miles of road rash - off the bike for 3 weeks. I have never injured by self while on a mt. bike, but admittedly do not ride mt. bikes all that often these days. I have had two friends who broke an arm and leg while mt. biking and am aware of several scraps and bruises, but that is about it. In my world, based on the large pool of active people I hang with, mt. biking is not without risk, but road cycling is clearly the most dangerous and lethal with skiing second (in terms of mortality while doing). I know a couple of folks who have shifted exclusively to mt. bike because cars simply scare the **** out of them. They focus on the climbs and simply cruise on descents so I do not expect them to be seriously hurt as most mt. bikers don't get hurt. OBTW, other than a strained ACL skating, while I have not sought medical assistance, slamming into a padding wall at 20mph while skating can and does hurt. I am well informed and choose to take on sports with some low risks because I simply enjoy them - in the end, I am much happier, extremely fit (my main goal for the year is the Markeville Death Ride, a 129 mile road ride climbing 5 Sierra Passes for over 15,000 ft of climbing - I will be hitting speeds in excess of 50mph on the descents) and admit I am addicted to the rush from regularly pushing my HR in the red-zone (for me that is above 175 bpm). If you choose to lead a calmer life, great for you, but dowdy old men (like you and Ed) should not judge those of us who seek out intense activities such as road cycling (very dangerous compared to mt. biking) and skating. Enjoy rick |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 8, 12:12*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote:
On Feb 8, 8:03*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Feb 7, 9:42*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote: On Feb 7, 6:54*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bob Berger" wrote in message ... [...] Rick: Will you PLEASE stop cluttering up this thread with facts. None of you confounded mountain bikers would know a fact if it jumped up and bit you in your dumb asses. Trails are for hikers, roads are for bikers. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a poor ****ed-up *******! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yawn, Ed, when you actually say something intelligent and relevant I am sure the world will actually end. *Are your meds giving out that you cannot keep your attention span together long enough to read? *No, Mike posted a article on a gentlemen who died while mt. biking implying strenuous exercise associated with mt. biking is bad, the medical profession disagrees with you and Mike. *If you are a healthy adult, regular strenuous exercise is good for your heart health - even more than simply strolling through the forest, which in its own right is enjoyable for many different reasons. *I made no value judgement as to mt. biking good or bad, simply your heart has no idea whether it is being "trained" or stressed while doing any number of back country activities such as trail running, cross country skiing, snow shoeing, and long distance power hiking. *I assume you look on these extreme sports type with disdain as they are not walking through the forest with their walker. *Most hikes I undertake are 10 plus miles and many push 20 miles usually at high elevation (the Sierra, I own a house at 6400 ft and go up from there) with extreme elevation gain. You may haul your over weight ass at a snails pace so your heart rate does not get above 75 bpm, but I and most of my hiking friends push ourselves. Maybe you hang out at the pub keeping your belly large, but I hang out with a largely uber fit crowd of hikers, runners (I have a couple of friends who are part of the ultra marathon crowd, 50 to 100 mile back country runs), cyclist (most road cyclist, but some mt. bikers), triatholoners, skaters who all crave (admitted addicted) to aerobic activities 4 to 6 times a week. *I just got back from a 2 hr dryland training (for skating) where we did these 15 minute drills that you feel like you want to throw up afterwards - this will greatly improve our skating fitness and we thrive on the pain. So I guess you and Mike will now lobby to keep all of those crazed uber fit trail users off the trails now. *Oh Minnesota, the great state where Santorium just won the Republican caucus. *Tell you what you stay in Minnesota, you fit the nut cases there. Enjoy, Rick- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You continue to miss the point, apparently deliberately. Mountain bikers claim that mountain biking is a healthful activity. But they fail to mention that it OFTEN results in a serious injury or even DEATH. That proves that their estimate of healthfulness is too high. In fact, it's dishonest to present the positive and ignore the negative. It's like the ads you see on TV for drugs. They talk about the benefits, and then say the side effects include "possible fatality" (they are required to say that, or they wouldn't). Mountain bikers aren't even that honest. Nor are you. In this newsgroup, only Ed and I tell the truth. QED Get it now? You left out the information from doctors about how dangerous mountain biking is. They are honest; you are NOT. Gotha! You and Ed score extremely high on the narcissistic scale and seem to be infatuated with each other. *Instead of discussing issues, if some offers another opinion, you reflectively call people mt bikers and liars - meaning you lost the argument. *Instead of labeling someone a mt. biker, let's evaluate whether or not most people would consider me one or not. *We know you have a very low threshold, someone merely has to have once owned a mt. bike to be a mt. biker in your world - a world populated by only you and Ed I might add. I just did a quick query of my training dairy (Polar ProTrainer) and in 2011, I engaged in (or more accurately recorded heart rate information) 358 activities. *There were many days where I would do 2 or 3 activities in a day, for example, snow shoe in the morning, ski mid-morning to the afternoon and then skate in the evening; or I might road ride, skate and than dryland train on the same day - each a distinct activity that lasted 1 or more hrs. The breakdown in order of frequency is 121 road cycling events (from 1 to 8 hr efforts), 102 speed skating events (1 to 3 hr efforts), 31 days hiking (1 to 12 hr efforts; did not back pack last year, 1st time in many years), 31 dryland/gym efforts (1 to 3 hr), 21 trail runs (1 to 2 hr), 20 snow shoeing efforts (1 to 4 hrs), 17 days skiing (2 to 8 hrs), 12 inline skate efforts (0.5 to 2 hrs - just picked these up late summer took some getting use to the boots), 3 mt. bike events (1, 1 and 4 hr efforts). I did not throw in a couple of kayak days in Lake Tahoe or some other excursions like walking miles in Manhattan with my daughter during the Christmas break. *34% and 28% of my effort was on a road bike and speed skating, respectively. *In other words, these two activities made up 62% of those activities I recorded. *Eight tenths of 1 percent was spent mt. biking. *Hiking, trail running and snow shoeing made up 96% of my time in the back country with the 3 mt bike rides I did accounted for 4%. So now we can talk facts and decide what best characterizes my activity. *Most folks (except maybe 2 people on the planet) would say I am a road cyclist and speed skater, and an outdoor enthusiast. *I am sure you an Ed will show just how biased an uninteresting you are (you are more like Michelle Bachnann and Rick Santorium then I suspect you would want to be considered) would label me a mt. biker. All sports have inherent risk. *Some more then others. *Mt. biking falls in the middle. *Orthopedic doctors from Barton Health Clinic in Tahoe and Kaiser in the Bay Area and a OS from Arizona (I have done a number of 100 mile road rides with him over the years) who own a major sport clinic in Arizona (oh, and none of the 4 drs. I talked to mt. bike) *rank skiing (by leaps and bounds over other sports), football (concussions are a big deal these days), soccer, and running as their big four. *They get smattering of basketball, cyclist (road and mt) and other active sports. *They all consider the net health benefits of mt. biking outweigh the risk of injury. *Death are not uncommon in skiing (several across the country each year) and between 600 to 700 road cyclist are killed each year by cars. *Football is primarily a US Sport: From 1931 to 2006, the National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research has reported 1,006 direct and 683 indirect fatalities resulting from participation in all organized football (professional, college, high school, and sandlot) in the US.[6]; the yearly number of indirect fatalities has remained near 9.0 per year. *I personally have known 5 people killed by cars while road cycling (dozens seriously hurt), 3 people killed backcountry skiing, 1 person kayacking, 3 people drowning while swimming (across a lake), 3 people died while hiking in the back country (mostly due to the elements but one slipped off a cliff - check out the books on deaths in Yosemite and Yellowstone - lots of hikers have died in those parks, i.e., slipping off hiking up to half dome), 2 mountaineering and from mt. biking. Now these were not al friends but include brief acquaintances. For my own part, as you see I am extremely active and the four most serious injuries I have ever suffered (all have happened in the last 4 yrs); I fractured my patella skiing April 2010 required surgery, back on my road bike with 10 weeks and the skiis 8 months later; modest strain to my right ACL 3 years ago while backpacking (needed PT and rest for 3 months); slight strain to my left ACL while skating 4 years ago (rest 1 month) and knocked off my road bike while descending Mt Wilson in Southern California by a stray dog, did not see a doctor but had miles of road rash - off the bike for 3 weeks. *I have never injured by self while on a mt. bike, but admittedly do not ride mt. bikes all that often these days. *I have had two friends who broke an arm and leg while mt. biking and am aware of several scraps and bruises, but that is about it. *In my world, based on the large pool of active people I hang with, mt. biking is not without risk, but road cycling is clearly the most dangerous and lethal with skiing second (in terms of mortality while doing). *I know a couple of folks who have shifted exclusively to mt. bike because cars simply scare the **** out of them. *They focus on the climbs and simply cruise on descents so I do not expect them to be seriously hurt as most mt. bikers don't get hurt. *OBTW, other than a strained ACL skating, while I have not sought medical assistance, slamming into a padding wall at 20mph while skating can and does hurt. I am well informed and choose to take on sports with some low risks because I simply enjoy them - in the end, I am much happier, extremely fit (my main goal for the year is the Markeville Death Ride, a 129 mile road ride climbing 5 Sierra Passes for over 15,000 ft of climbing - I will be hitting speeds in excess ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 9, 12:27*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Feb 8, 12:12*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote: On Feb 8, 8:03*am, Mike Vandeman wrote: On Feb 7, 9:42*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote: On Feb 7, 6:54*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Bob Berger" wrote in message ... [...] Rick: Will you PLEASE stop cluttering up this thread with facts.. None of you confounded mountain bikers would know a fact if it jumped up and bit you in your dumb asses. Trails are for hikers, roads are for bikers. Anyone who thinks otherwise is a poor ****ed-up *******! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yawn, Ed, when you actually say something intelligent and relevant I am sure the world will actually end. *Are your meds giving out that you cannot keep your attention span together long enough to read? *No, Mike posted a article on a gentlemen who died while mt. biking implying strenuous exercise associated with mt. biking is bad, the medical profession disagrees with you and Mike. *If you are a healthy adult, regular strenuous exercise is good for your heart health - even more than simply strolling through the forest, which in its own right is enjoyable for many different reasons. *I made no value judgement as to mt. biking good or bad, simply your heart has no idea whether it is being "trained" or stressed while doing any number of back country activities such as trail running, cross country skiing, snow shoeing, and long distance power hiking. *I assume you look on these extreme sports type with disdain as they are not walking through the forest with their walker. *Most hikes I undertake are 10 plus miles and many push 20 miles usually at high elevation (the Sierra, I own a house at 6400 ft and go up from there) with extreme elevation gain. You may haul your over weight ass at a snails pace so your heart rate does not get above 75 bpm, but I and most of my hiking friends push ourselves. Maybe you hang out at the pub keeping your belly large, but I hang out with a largely uber fit crowd of hikers, runners (I have a couple of friends who are part of the ultra marathon crowd, 50 to 100 mile back country runs), cyclist (most road cyclist, but some mt. bikers), triatholoners, skaters who all crave (admitted addicted) to aerobic activities 4 to 6 times a week. *I just got back from a 2 hr dryland training (for skating) where we did these 15 minute drills that you feel like you want to throw up afterwards - this will greatly improve our skating fitness and we thrive on the pain. So I guess you and Mike will now lobby to keep all of those crazed uber fit trail users off the trails now. *Oh Minnesota, the great state where Santorium just won the Republican caucus. *Tell you what you stay in Minnesota, you fit the nut cases there. Enjoy, Rick- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You continue to miss the point, apparently deliberately. Mountain bikers claim that mountain biking is a healthful activity. But they fail to mention that it OFTEN results in a serious injury or even DEATH. That proves that their estimate of healthfulness is too high. In fact, it's dishonest to present the positive and ignore the negative. It's like the ads you see on TV for drugs. They talk about the benefits, and then say the side effects include "possible fatality" (they are required to say that, or they wouldn't). Mountain bikers aren't even that honest. Nor are you. In this newsgroup, only Ed and I tell the truth. QED Get it now? You left out the information from doctors about how dangerous mountain biking is. They are honest; you are NOT. Gotha! You and Ed score extremely high on the narcissistic scale and seem to be infatuated with each other. *Instead of discussing issues, if some offers another opinion, you reflectively call people mt bikers and liars - meaning you lost the argument. *Instead of labeling someone a mt. biker, let's evaluate whether or not most people would consider me one or not. *We know you have a very low threshold, someone merely has to have once owned a mt. bike to be a mt. biker in your world - a world populated by only you and Ed I might add. I just did a quick query of my training dairy (Polar ProTrainer) and in 2011, I engaged in (or more accurately recorded heart rate information) 358 activities. *There were many days where I would do 2 or 3 activities in a day, for example, snow shoe in the morning, ski mid-morning to the afternoon and then skate in the evening; or I might road ride, skate and than dryland train on the same day - each a distinct activity that lasted 1 or more hrs. The breakdown in order of frequency is 121 road cycling events (from 1 to 8 hr efforts), 102 speed skating events (1 to 3 hr efforts), 31 days hiking (1 to 12 hr efforts; did not back pack last year, 1st time in many years), 31 dryland/gym efforts (1 to 3 hr), 21 trail runs (1 to 2 hr), 20 snow shoeing efforts (1 to 4 hrs), 17 days skiing (2 to 8 hrs), 12 inline skate efforts (0.5 to 2 hrs - just picked these up late summer took some getting use to the boots), 3 mt. bike events (1, 1 and 4 hr efforts). I did not throw in a couple of kayak days in Lake Tahoe or some other excursions like walking miles in Manhattan with my daughter during the Christmas break. *34% and 28% of my effort was on a road bike and speed skating, respectively. *In other words, these two activities made up 62% of those activities I recorded. *Eight tenths of 1 percent was spent mt. biking. *Hiking, trail running and snow shoeing made up 96% of my time in the back country with the 3 mt bike rides I did accounted for 4%. So now we can talk facts and decide what best characterizes my activity. *Most folks (except maybe 2 people on the planet) would say I am a road cyclist and speed skater, and an outdoor enthusiast. *I am sure you an Ed will show just how biased an uninteresting you are (you are more like Michelle Bachnann and Rick Santorium then I suspect you would want to be considered) would label me a mt. biker. All sports have inherent risk. *Some more then others. *Mt. biking falls in the middle. *Orthopedic doctors from Barton Health Clinic in Tahoe and Kaiser in the Bay Area and a OS from Arizona (I have done a number of 100 mile road rides with him over the years) who own a major sport clinic in Arizona (oh, and none of the 4 drs. I talked to mt. bike) *rank skiing (by leaps and bounds over other sports), football (concussions are a big deal these days), soccer, and running as their big four. *They get smattering of basketball, cyclist (road and mt) and other active sports. *They all consider the net health benefits of mt. biking outweigh the risk of injury. *Death are not uncommon in skiing (several across the country each year) and between 600 to 700 road cyclist are killed each year by cars. *Football is primarily a US Sport: From 1931 to 2006, the National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research has reported 1,006 direct and 683 indirect fatalities resulting from participation in all organized football (professional, college, high school, and sandlot) in the US.[6]; the yearly number of indirect fatalities has remained near 9.0 per year. *I personally have known 5 people killed by cars while road cycling (dozens seriously hurt), 3 people killed backcountry skiing, 1 person kayacking, 3 people drowning while swimming (across a lake), 3 people died while hiking in the back country (mostly due to the elements but one slipped off a cliff - check out the books on deaths in Yosemite and Yellowstone - lots of hikers have died in those parks, i.e., slipping off hiking up to half dome), 2 mountaineering and from mt. biking. Now these were not al friends but include brief acquaintances. For my own part, as you see I am extremely active and the four most serious injuries I have ever suffered (all have happened in the last 4 yrs); I fractured my patella skiing April 2010 required surgery, back on my road bike with 10 weeks and the skiis 8 months later; modest strain to my right ACL 3 years ago while backpacking (needed PT and rest for 3 months); slight strain to my left ACL while skating 4 years ago (rest 1 month) and knocked off my road bike while descending Mt Wilson in Southern California by a stray dog, did not see a doctor but had miles of road rash - off the bike for 3 weeks. *I have never injured by self while on a mt. bike, but admittedly do not ride mt. bikes all that often these days. *I have had two friends who broke an arm and leg while mt. biking and am aware of several scraps and bruises, but that is about it. *In my world, based on the large pool of active people I hang with, mt. biking is not without risk, but road cycling is clearly the most dangerous and lethal with skiing second (in terms of mortality while doing). *I know a couple of folks who have shifted exclusively to mt. bike because cars simply scare the **** out of them. *They focus on the climbs and simply cruise on descents so I do not expect them to be seriously hurt as most mt. bikers don't get hurt. *OBTW, other than a strained ACL skating, while I have not sought medical assistance, slamming into a padding wall at 20mph while skating can and does hurt. I am well informed and choose to take on sports with some low risks because I simply enjoy them - in the end, I am much happier, extremely fit (my main goal for the year is the Markeville Death Ride, a 129 mile road ride climbing 5 Sierra Passes for over 15,000 ft of climbing - I will be hitting speeds in excess ... read more »- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. Your attention span and reading comprehension is rather poor. If you had actually read the post you will see I clearly answered your questions. Oh, and medical research show that mt. bike injuries have declined 56% since 1995. Paper published in medical journal in 2011 completed a long study of mt. bike injuries since 1995 to 2007. The net result from the medical profession is that the benefits (heart health - pre-existing conditions should follow drs. advice) of mt. biking outweigh any risk. So this line of reasoning if simply bogus. Enjoy, Rick |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
"Rick Hopkins" wrote in message
... On Feb 9, 12:27 am, Mike Vandeman wrote: [...] You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. Your attention span and reading comprehension is rather poor. If you had actually read the post you will see I clearly answered your questions. Oh, and medical research show that mt. bike injuries have declined 56% since 1995. I think mountain biking itself has declined by at least that much. Only dyed-in-the-wool assholes continue to do it. Paper published in medical journal in 2011 completed a long study of mt. bike injuries since 1995 to 2007. The net result from the medical profession is that the benefits (heart health - pre-existing conditions should follow drs. advice) of mt. biking outweigh any risk. So this line of reasoning if simply bogus. Enjoy, Rick The only bogus character here is you. The medical profession does not know **** about anything other than their specialties. What they know least of all is what it takes to be fit and healthy. Your extreme sport regimen is for idiots. You will come to grief with it sooner or later, but since you are such a dunderhead, you will have to learn that the hard way. By the way, whether you mountain bike much or not is not the point. You defend it which is the same thing in my book. Therefore ... to the Devil with you! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 9, 2:23*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Rick Hopkins" wrote in message ... On Feb 9, 12:27 am, Mike Vandeman wrote: [...] You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. Your attention span and reading comprehension is rather poor. *If you had actually read the post you will see I clearly answered your questions. *Oh, and medical research show that mt. bike injuries have declined 56% since 1995. I think mountain biking itself has declined by at least that much. Only dyed-in-the-wool assholes continue to do it. Paper published in medical journal in 2011 completed a long study of mt. bike injuries since 1995 to 2007. *The net result from the medical profession is that the benefits (heart health - pre-existing conditions should follow drs. advice) *of mt. biking outweigh any risk. *So this line of reasoning if simply bogus. Enjoy, Rick The only bogus character here is you. The medical profession does not know **** about anything other than their specialties. What they know least of all is what it takes to be fit and healthy. Your extreme sport regimen is for idiots. You will come to grief with it sooner or later, but since you are such a dunderhead, you will have to learn that the hard way. By the way, whether you mountain bike much or not is not the point. You defend it which is the same thing in my book. Therefore ... to the Devil with you! PRECISELY! People who defend mountain biking are even stupider than the mountain bikers. Well, at least they aren't dumb enough to actually risk their life & limb by DOING it.... Mountain bikers are one of the lowest forms of human life -- if it can even be called "human". Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 9, 2:23*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Rick Hopkins" wrote in message ... On Feb 9, 12:27 am, Mike Vandeman wrote: [...] You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. Your attention span and reading comprehension is rather poor. *If you had actually read the post you will see I clearly answered your questions. *Oh, and medical research show that mt. bike injuries have declined 56% since 1995. I think mountain biking itself has declined by at least that much. Only dyed-in-the-wool assholes continue to do it. Paper published in medical journal in 2011 completed a long study of mt. bike injuries since 1995 to 2007. *The net result from the medical profession is that the benefits (heart health - pre-existing conditions should follow drs. advice) *of mt. biking outweigh any risk. *So this line of reasoning if simply bogus. Enjoy, Rick The only bogus character here is you. The medical profession does not know **** about anything other than their specialties. What they know least of all is what it takes to be fit and healthy. Your extreme sport regimen is for idiots. You will come to grief with it sooner or later, but since you are such a dunderhead, you will have to learn that the hard way. By the way, whether you mountain bike much or not is not the point. You defend it which is the same thing in my book. Therefore ... to the Devil with you! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yeah why rely on experts when you and Mike just make **** up to fit your tiny little world. You guys remind me of when Don Quixote quips in the musical "Man of La Mancha" "facts are the enemy of truth". I take evidence based approaches. If you dislike mt bikes in nature, fine make your case, but relying on clearly deficient arguments makes you two look stupider and stupider. The clear consensus in the medial profession (which are the experts on this not you two numnuts) is that mt. biking has modest risk associated with it, and the health benefits outweigh the risk. I put you folks debating this point in the same bucket of climate change deniers and creationist - you have a preconceived notion and god forbid if anyone provides evidence which disproves your preconceptions - instead of discarding poor arguments and honing your opposition on evidence, you name call and attack those who proffer contrary information as liars and mt. bikers. You are no better then the anti-science crowd which controls the Republican Party these days. So no Ed, this is not a defense of mt biking, but one that clearly exposes your line of reasoning that mt biking is so dangerous it outweighs the health benefits (contrary to the opinion of the experts that are trained to judge the relationship of health benefit vs risk). You and Mike seems to be infatuated this notion which is clearly deficient and wildly inconsistent with an evidence- based approach. But lacking facts has never stopped you two before and doubt it will now. Enjoy Rick |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 9, 5:16*pm, Rick Hopkins wrote:
On Feb 9, 2:23*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: "Rick Hopkins" wrote in message .... On Feb 9, 12:27 am, Mike Vandeman wrote: [...] You seem to be good at name-calling, but not much else. You can't even follow a conversation. No one labelled you a mountain biker. You fantasized that. Reread my last post and reply to it. No more longwinded irrelevant off-topic rants, please. Your attention span and reading comprehension is rather poor. *If you had actually read the post you will see I clearly answered your questions. *Oh, and medical research show that mt. bike injuries have declined 56% since 1995. I think mountain biking itself has declined by at least that much. Only dyed-in-the-wool assholes continue to do it. Paper published in medical journal in 2011 completed a long study of mt. bike injuries since 1995 to 2007. *The net result from the medical profession is that the benefits (heart health - pre-existing conditions should follow drs. advice) *of mt. biking outweigh any risk. *So this line of reasoning if simply bogus. Enjoy, Rick The only bogus character here is you. The medical profession does not know **** about anything other than their specialties. What they know least of all is what it takes to be fit and healthy. Your extreme sport regimen is for idiots. You will come to grief with it sooner or later, but since you are such a dunderhead, you will have to learn that the hard way. By the way, whether you mountain bike much or not is not the point. You defend it which is the same thing in my book. Therefore ... to the Devil with you! -- Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota Yeah why rely on experts when you and Mike just make **** up to fit your tiny little world. *You guys remind me of when *Don Quixote quips in the musical "Man of La Mancha" "facts are the enemy of truth". *I take evidence based approaches. *If you dislike mt bikes in nature, fine make your case, but relying on clearly deficient arguments makes you two look stupider and stupider. * The clear consensus in the medial profession (which are the experts on this not you two numnuts) is that mt. biking has modest risk associated with it, and the health benefits outweigh the risk. *I put you folks debating this point in the same bucket of climate change deniers and creationist - you have a preconceived notion and god forbid if anyone provides evidence which disproves your preconceptions - instead of discarding poor arguments and honing your opposition on evidence, you name call and attack those who proffer contrary information as liars and mt. bikers. You are no better then the anti-science crowd which controls the Republican Party these days. *So no Ed, this is not a defense of mt biking, but one that clearly exposes your line of reasoning that mt biking is so dangerous it outweighs the health benefits (contrary to the opinion of the experts that are trained to judge the relationship of health benefit vs risk). *You and *Mike seems to be infatuated this notion which is clearly deficient and wildly inconsistent with an evidence- based approach. *But lacking facts has never stopped you two before and doubt it will now. Enjoy Rick- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - BS. I'm the world expert on the harm that mountain biking does, and I have given papers on the subject at a couple dozen scientific conferences. You haven't given a single citation to support your contention. For example, how EXACTLY do you balance serious injury and death against the alleged health benefits of mountain biking? What WEIGHT, for example, to give a death? It can't be done, except subjectively, so your conclusion is BS. That's like the m=land managers who claim to be able to "BALANCE" recreation with conservation. What a joke! You are nothing but an amateur pretending to be a professional. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 10, 3:13*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
BS. I'm the world expert on the harm that mountain biking does, and I have given papers on the subject at a couple dozen scientific conferences. snip What a joke! You are nothing but an amateur pretending to be a professional. You have presented "papers" related to the harm that mountain biking does at 24 conferences, huh? Name the conferences. If you can't, then you are obviously lying again. Don't bother responding with anything other than a list of 24 conferences. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
ANOTHER Mountain Biker Dies!
On Feb 10, 3:17*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
You are nothing but hot air. How many SCIENTIFIC PAPERS have you written on the subject of mountain biking? NONE, I suspect. And worse, you aren't HONEST. You would be laughed out of the scientific conferences where I give my papers, because there's nothing behind your words but hot air. NOT ONE SCIENTIFIC CITATION!. How many SCIENTIFIC PAPERS have you published in refereed journals on the subject? NONE, I suspect. Any jackass with a computer can find a conference to accept an abstract. You seem to have deluded yourself into believing that your ability to shop for conferences with sufficiently low standards makes you some kind of "authority." Why don't you publish in an actual SCIENTIFIC journal? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mancos mountain biker dies in mountain biking accident | Mike Vandeman[_4_] | Mountain Biking | 3 | May 22nd 11 06:01 PM |
Mancos mountain biker dies in mountain biking accident | Mike Vandeman[_4_] | Social Issues | 3 | May 22nd 11 06:01 PM |
Another Mountain Biker Dies! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 0 | October 16th 07 04:44 PM |
Another Mountain Biker Dies | SuperG | Mountain Biking | 9 | July 5th 05 06:01 AM |
Thanks for demonstrating the character of the typical mountain biker! (was Novice Dies from Accident in "Beginner's" Mountain Biking Class!" | Gary S. | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 26th 05 08:48 PM |