A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Frame geometery



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 17th 04, 01:21 PM
Colin Marshall
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Frame geometery

Hi,

I have a frame with a 72 seat angle 57.5 top tube and 55(c-c) seat tube with
a 120 stem.

It has been suggested that a 73 seat tube with a 56.5 top tube and a 120
stem is exactly the same.

My maths is not that good, are the equivalent?

Thanks



Ads
  #2  
Old August 17th 04, 02:07 PM
Qui si parla Campagnolo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

cpm- I have a frame with a 72 seat angle 57.5 top tube and 55(c-c) seat tube
with
a 120 stem.

It has been suggested that a 73 seat tube with a 56.5 top tube and a 120
stem is exactly the same. BRBR
My maths is not that good, are the equivalent? BRBR


Essentially. General rule of thumb is as you change the seattube angle by one
degree, and moving your saddle forward or aft ro accomodate this to retain
KOPS, you move it 1cm.



Peter Chisholm
Vecchio's Bicicletteria
1833 Pearl St.
Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535
http://www.vecchios.com
"Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"
  #3  
Old August 17th 04, 02:07 PM
Qui si parla Campagnolo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

cpm- I have a frame with a 72 seat angle 57.5 top tube and 55(c-c) seat tube
with
a 120 stem.

It has been suggested that a 73 seat tube with a 56.5 top tube and a 120
stem is exactly the same. BRBR
My maths is not that good, are the equivalent? BRBR


Essentially. General rule of thumb is as you change the seattube angle by one
degree, and moving your saddle forward or aft ro accomodate this to retain
KOPS, you move it 1cm.



Peter Chisholm
Vecchio's Bicicletteria
1833 Pearl St.
Boulder, CO, 80302
(303)440-3535
http://www.vecchios.com
"Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene"
  #4  
Old August 18th 04, 03:30 AM
Bruce Frech
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

the setback of the toptube and seattube intersection is cos(angle) times
seattube length. So the difference between a 72 and a 73 seat angle for a
55 C-C seattube is:

55cm * (cos(72) - cos(73)) = 0.924 cm, which is close enough to one
centimeter for your needs.

Bruce

"Colin Marshall" wrote in message
...
Hi,

I have a frame with a 72 seat angle 57.5 top tube and 55(c-c) seat tube

with
a 120 stem.

It has been suggested that a 73 seat tube with a 56.5 top tube and a 120
stem is exactly the same.

My maths is not that good, are the equivalent?

Thanks





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 Mike Iglesias General 4 October 29th 04 07:11 AM
2003 Aegis Shaman Cyclocross Carbon Fiber 56 CM frame for sale Nat Busquelo Racing 0 August 24th 04 05:58 PM
Carbon frame intregrity after accident Jürgen Hartwig Techniques 37 November 6th 03 02:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.