|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website:
http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...duc ts_id=138 and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light. I previously used a 15 watt Planet Bike halogen which I thought was pretty good, but this thing really lights up the road. I'm not a fan of the mounting system, which is essentially an O-ring that wraps around the handlebar. It works ok but with winter coming on it's going to be annoying to remove with gloves on. On the other hand, because no mount is needed on the handlebars, it's easy to move to another bike. The batch mine came from also has a strobe mode that is way too fast - good for inducing epileptic fits I think. Most of the lights supposedly do a 3 flash/second rate but mine is like 30/second. Not a big deal for me though since I have a "be seen" light to handle that chore. Anyway, if you're looking to light up the road without spending a few hundred bucks, this is your light. I have no connection to anyone producing, selling, or otherwise profiting from this light; I just think it is amazing considering the others that I've seen/tried. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
dgk wrote:
I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...duc ts_id=138 and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light. I previously used a 15 watt Planet Bike halogen which I thought was pretty good, but this thing really lights up the road. I'm not a fan of the mounting system, which is essentially an O-ring that wraps around the handlebar. It works ok but with winter coming on it's going to be annoying to remove with gloves on. On the other hand, because no mount is needed on the handlebars, it's easy to move to another bike. The batch mine came from also has a strobe mode that is way too fast - good for inducing epileptic fits I think. Most of the lights supposedly do a 3 flash/second rate but mine is like 30/second. Not a big deal for me though since I have a "be seen" light to handle that chore. Anyway, if you're looking to light up the road without spending a few hundred bucks, this is your light. I have no connection to anyone producing, selling, or otherwise profiting from this light; I just think it is amazing considering the others that I've seen/tried. My concern is that it's overkill for the road. From one of the comments on the DX site: "Other Thoughts: This is the first bicycle light I have used that elicits complaints from people on the street. I light to grab the attention of cab drivers but the hostility of pedestrians is a bit too much." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
In article ,
Peter Cole wrote: dgk wrote: I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...th=4_41&produc ts_id=138 and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light. My concern is that it's overkill for the road. From one of the comments on the DX site: "Other Thoughts: This is the first bicycle light I have used that elicits complaints from people on the street. I light to grab the attention of cab drivers but the hostility of pedestrians is a bit too much." I have a light of very similar power: a flashlight using a P7-SSC emitter also rated at 900 lumens. My light has a high and low light mode. The low mode makes for a very good "being seen" light on already lit roads, as well as providing noticeable additional light. It's not obnoxious to bystanders though. The high beam is good enough to ride in otherwise-unlit terrain, at speed. I'd recommend aiming the light low for city use: the normal travel speeds of bicycles mean you don't need nearly as much throw as a car's headlights, and if your light is aimed fairly close in front of your bike, you won't be annoying pedestrians. Dealextreme sells exactly the same bike light now, so compare prices. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
On Oct 15, 9:48*am, dgk wrote:
I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...nfo&cPath=4_41.... and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light... I'm disappointed that the beam is the usual radially symmetric spot- plus-fog pattern. For $90, couldn't they afford to put a proper lens on the front? Think of the benefit of having more light spread off to the left and right, for seeing into sharp turns and for being seen by motorists at stop signs, etc. Why are we instead trying to melt asphalt 100 yards dead ahead? - Frank Krygowski |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
Frank Krygowski wrote:
On Oct 15, 9:48 am, dgk wrote: I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...nfo&cPath=4_41... and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light... I'm disappointed that the beam is the usual radially symmetric spot- plus-fog pattern. For $90, couldn't they afford to put a proper lens on the front? Think of the benefit of having more light spread off to the left and right, for seeing into sharp turns and for being seen by motorists at stop signs, etc. Why are we instead trying to melt asphalt 100 yards dead ahead? - Frank Krygowski I have to agree. When bike lights start approaching car lights in brilliance, if they're ridden on the same roads, they should adhere to the same standards. Seeing an oncoming car, or having them see you, isn't much good if you blind them in the process. These lights can often be run at reduced power -- LEDs being particularly good at that, since they get more efficient and don't color shift. Without beam shaping/masking, I think going over 100 lumens or so (a good 5-10W halogen) can be a problem. These high output bike lights are really intended for off road use, where lots of light and a broad beam pattern are what you want. Now that they've become cheap, they're going to cause problems. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
On Oct 16, 12:26*pm, Peter Cole wrote:
Frank Krygowski wrote: On Oct 15, 9:48 am, dgk wrote: I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...nfo&cPath=4_41... and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light... I'm disappointed that the beam is the usual radially symmetric spot- plus-fog pattern. *For $90, couldn't they afford to put a proper lens on the front? Think of the benefit of having more light spread off to the left and right, for seeing into sharp turns and for being seen by motorists at stop signs, etc. *Why are we instead trying to melt asphalt 100 yards dead ahead? - Frank Krygowski I have to agree. When bike lights start approaching car lights in brilliance, if they're ridden on the same roads, they should adhere to the same standards. Seeing an oncoming car, or having them see you, isn't much good if you blind them in the process. These lights can often be run at reduced power -- LEDs being particularly good at that, since they get more efficient and don't color shift. Without beam shaping/masking, I think going over 100 lumens or so (a good 5-10W halogen) can be a problem. These high output bike lights are really intended for off road use, where lots of light and a broad beam pattern are what you want. Now that they've become cheap, they're going to cause problems. uh, motorcar headlamps are generally 55W of halogen, each. You have a good point that vehicles sharing the same roads should use the same standards. But you must be on crack if you think anything you're gonna buy in a bike shop is too powerful to shine at a motorist. Some of the cheaper running light kits ($20 for a pair) work nicely on a bike. The common 55W model requires too big of a battery for my little gumby legs. But if you look around you can find 36W replacement bulbs or even some kits that start out with 'em. Using 36W makes the math a lot easier too, 3a as opposed to 4&7/12ths. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
DennisTheBald wrote:
On Oct 16, 12:26 pm, Peter Cole wrote: These high output bike lights are really intended for off road use, where lots of light and a broad beam pattern are what you want. Now that they've become cheap, they're going to cause problems. uh, motorcar headlamps are generally 55W of halogen, each. You have a good point that vehicles sharing the same roads should use the same standards. But you must be on crack if you think anything you're gonna buy in a bike shop is too powerful to shine at a motorist. Yes, but halogens are at most 20 lumens/watt, so that's 1100 lumens max. A 700 lumen light is getting into the ballpark. 50W halogen bike lights are not uncommon off road, HID lights can be even more powerful. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
On Oct 16, 3:53*pm, DennisTheBald wrote:
*You have a good point that vehicles sharing the same roads should use the same standards. *But you must be on crack if you think anything you're gonna buy in a bike shop is too powerful to shine at a motorist. I've been nearly blinded by an oncoming cyclist with super-bright unfocused lights on a bike path. In my view, it's no better than those fool oncoming motorists who say "Hey, is that a bicycle coming toward me? I'd better put on my high beams and accessory lights to make sure." You just don't need very much light above the horizontal plane. - Frank Krygowski |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
dgk wrote:
I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...duc ts_id=138 and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light. I previously used a 15 watt Planet Bike halogen which I thought was pretty good, but this thing really lights up the road. I'm not a fan of the mounting system, which is essentially an O-ring that wraps around the handlebar. It works ok but with winter coming on it's going to be annoying to remove with gloves on. On the other hand, because no mount is needed on the handlebars, it's easy to move to another bike. The batch mine came from also has a strobe mode that is way too fast - good for inducing epileptic fits I think. Most of the lights supposedly do a 3 flash/second rate but mine is like 30/second. Not a big deal for me though since I have a "be seen" light to handle that chore. Anyway, if you're looking to light up the road without spending a few hundred bucks, this is your light. I'd also check out the 900 lumen Li-Ion light at "http://dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.17383". Actually it's no cheaper because you still have to buy the two 18650 Li-Ion cells and a charger, but it is self contained. Attach it with a TwoFish block. Three advantages: 1. No separate battery pack 2. You can carry spare, fully charged batteries. 3. Low mode I don't know how many times I'd need a 900 lumen light, but at least the flashlight has two lesser brightnesses as well as a strobe. DealExtreme also sells the same light you have, for less, with free shipping. "http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.25149" These are good lights to use on bicycles with dynamo systems when the dynamo lights aren't powerful enough. Certainly powerful enough to eliminate the need for a several hundred dollar HID system! BTW, both of these lights are temporarily sold out or back-ordered. I know bicyclists have been ordering both of these based on what I've seen around here. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Magicshine 900 light
In article
, Frank Krygowski wrote: On Oct 15, 9:48*am, dgk wrote: I bought this based on the comments on the Bike Forum website: http://www.geomangear.com/index.php?...nfo&cPath=4_41... and for $90 it is an astonishingly powerful light... I'm disappointed that the beam is the usual radially symmetric spot- plus-fog pattern. For $90, couldn't they afford to put a proper lens on the front? Think of the benefit of having more light spread off to the left and right, for seeing into sharp turns and for being seen by motorists at stop signs, etc. Why are we instead trying to melt asphalt 100 yards dead ahead? The major market for these is probably more interested in off-road riding than on-road riding. For off-roaders, the optics are very good. Also, a fair number of these will end up on helmets. When you can point your light by looking somewhere, several theoretical problems go away. In practice, I have two flashlights with a similar emitter (SSC-P7), and I use them almost exclusively on low-beam mode on streets at night. Even so they provide visible ("seeing" as opposed to "being seen") illumination for finding your way. In truly unlit conditions, the hi-beam will see you through. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bright up your advertising with a slim light box !----11 mm LED light box in China! | Gabe Vanrenen | UK | 0 | June 29th 07 05:08 AM |
Recommendation for 700c x 42-45 tire for light off-road (fire roads,light trail use) | SMS | General | 4 | August 12th 05 06:26 AM |
Recommendation for 700c x 42-45 tire for light off-road (fire roads,light trail use) | SMS | Techniques | 9 | August 12th 05 06:26 AM |
Selle San Marco Concor Light. But not really light. | Greg Achtem | Marketplace | 0 | December 23rd 04 05:57 PM |
FA: Selle San Marco Concor Light. Light being a relative term. | Greg Achtem | Marketplace | 0 | December 23rd 04 05:53 PM |