#141
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Jan 19, 9:18*pm, Justin wrote:
It is such fun to be wanked by Judith: That's an image that none of us needs. |
Ads |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Jan 19, 9:18*pm, Justin wrote:
Oh that delicious Judith vernacular! ****** - well done! An admission of having no valid arguments or support. It is such fun to be wanked by Judith: an honour, in fact. BTW, there is no jury. Grow up. I won't be able to sleep tonight: Judith said that Steve said that I am a ******. Booo hoooo! Blub blub. See you at the BP AGM.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I will be there ready with my camera when JMS asks its question. The photo will save plod having to track it down. -- Simon Mason |
#143
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:37:42 +0000, Judith wrote:
Porker and Simple The classification of hagfish has been controversial. The issue is whether the hagfish is itself a degenerate type of vertebrate-fish (most closely related to lampreys), or else may represent a stage which precedes the evolution of the vertebral column (as do lancelets) -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#144
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:43:58 +0000, Judith wrote:
****** - biggest ****wits The original scheme groups hagfish and lampreys together as cyclostomes (or historically, Agnatha), as the oldest surviving clade of vertebrates alongside gnathostomes (the now-ubiquitous jawed-vertebrates). -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:56:30 +0000, Judith wrote:
****wit already. Porky Chapman An alternative scheme proposed that jawed-vertebrates are more closely related to lampreys than to hagfish (i..e, that vertebrates include lampreys but exclude hagfish), and introduces the category craniata to group vertebrates near hagfish. Recent DNA evidence has supported the original scheme. -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:34:53 +0000, Judith wrote:
you are a ****? Hagfish average about half a metre (18 in); The largest known species is Eptatretus goliath with a specimen recorded at 127 cm, while Myxine kuoi and Myxine pequenoi seem to reach no more than 18 cm (some have been seen as small as 4 cm). -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:49:57 -0800, Justin wrote:
On 19 jan, 14:56, Judith wrote: On Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:02:17 -0800 (PST), Justin wrote: snip You allege that I have been posting as JM Messie (J.M.Messie ) . I invited and invite you to back up this incorrect assertion. You have failed to do so. It is a perversion of any form of debate or logic to consider an assertion as correct by dint of its having been made. It is an even greater perversion to then place the onus upon disproving that assertion rather than proving it. You are wriggling : JM Messie's email address is ) Â*- you have posted using that address - therefore you have posted as JM Messie. Have you posted using JM Messie's email address of ? - a straight yes or a no will suffice. Not difficult that is it? Feel free to deny it - or just ****-off; you have shown that you are a ****wit already. This is the Porky Chapman method - try and be smart when "denying" something. Some will believe you - but others will smell the rat - or is it a piglet? It is an honour to be "**** offed" and "****witted" by Judith in one post. It most certainly is! You have come of age! -- An oft-repeated lie is still a lie. |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On 20/01/2012 03:48, Simon Mason wrote:
On Jan 19, 9:18 pm, wrote: Oh that delicious Judith vernacular! ****** - well done! An admission of having no valid arguments or support. It is such fun to be wanked by Judith: an honour, in fact. BTW, there is no jury. Grow up. I won't be able to sleep tonight: Judith said that Steve said that I am a ******. Booo hoooo! Blub blub. See you at the BP AGM.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I will be there ready with my camera when JMS asks its question. The photo will save plod having to track it down. ....and then you will wake up & realise it was just a dream. -- Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster University |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On Jan 20, 1:24*am, "
wrote: On Jan 19, 9:18*pm, Justin wrote: It is such fun to be wanked by Judith: That's an image that none of us needs. Especially since JMS is an old man. -- Simon Mason |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
First week
On 20 jan, 09:52, Simon Mason wrote:
On Jan 20, 1:24*am, " wrote: On Jan 19, 9:18*pm, Justin wrote: It is such fun to be wanked by Judith: That's an image that none of us needs. Especially since JMS is an old man. -- Simon Mason Seriously? How old? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[melb] tips for week in week out dirt crits? | dej | Australia | 5 | November 23rd 06 09:39 PM |
Helmet week next week on my new Blog & Question about Helmets! | 101bike | Techniques | 8 | March 17th 06 06:05 PM |
RR: The Same as Last Week | Ride-A-Lot | Mountain Biking | 18 | December 22nd 04 12:35 AM |
_Rhymes_With_Orange_ (Week of 9-Feb): Is it bike week? | Jym Dyer | General | 0 | February 10th 04 04:13 PM |
Personal statistic - More miles/week than hours worked/week | Peter Fox | UK | 10 | October 1st 03 10:17 PM |