A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Spoke lacing on a Rohloff



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 27th 04, 10:20 PM
Dan Burkhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Spoke lacing on a Rohloff


Hello all. Hope Santa was good to everyone. I just finished building a
Speedhub into a 26" Mavic X517, and contrary to Rohloff's insistence
that 26" wheels must be built 2 cross, I made it 3 cross using 256mm
spokes, and it looks ok to me. The nipples come out of the rim at a
slightly greater than normal angle, but not as severely as a 4 cross 36
spoke wheel I have with a Sachs 7 speed hub.
Just wondering if anyone else here has built them 3 cross and how they
held up over time.
Thanks
Dan


--
Dan Burkhart

Ads
  #2  
Old December 27th 04, 11:17 PM
(Pete Cresswell)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Per Dan Burkhart:
Just wondering if anyone else here has built them 3 cross and how they
held up over time.


Haven't tried 3x, but how much do you weigh?

I'm about 220# and have toasted 3 517's laced 2x on the rear....so now I use
something stronger in the rear.
--
PeteCresswell
  #3  
Old December 28th 04, 12:26 AM
Tom Ace
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dan Burkhart wrote:

Hello all. Hope Santa was good to everyone. I just finished building

a
Speedhub into a 26" Mavic X517, and contrary to Rohloff's insistence
that 26" wheels must be built 2 cross, I made it 3 cross using 256mm
spokes, and it looks ok to me. The nipples come out of the rim at a
slightly greater than normal angle, but not as severely as a 4 cross

36
spoke wheel I have with a Sachs 7 speed hub.


What was your goal in lacing 3X?

2X on a Speedhub already has a lever arm larger than you
get with tangential lacing on a typical large-flange hub.
That is, Rohloff 2X is already overkill for torsional
stiffness. 3X just makes the angle at the rim worse,
without any significant benefit that I can think of.


Tom Ace

  #4  
Old December 28th 04, 12:30 AM
Dan Burkhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


(Pete Cresswell) Wrote:
Per Dan Burkhart:
Just wondering if anyone else here has built them 3 cross and how

they
held up over time.


Haven't tried 3x, but how much do you weigh?

I'm about 220# and have toasted 3 517's laced 2x on the rear....so now
I use
something stronger in the rear.
--
PeteCresswell


I weigh about 245, and I have been riding this bike for 5 years on the
original Mavic 223s with nary a broken spoke or a tacoed wheel, so I
thought the 517 would work ok. After hearing about your experience
though, I guess I better keep an eye on it.
Dan


--
Dan Burkhart

  #5  
Old December 28th 04, 12:46 AM
Dan Burkhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Tom Ace Wrote:
Dan Burkhart wrote:

Hello all. Hope Santa was good to everyone. I just finished building

a
Speedhub into a 26" Mavic X517, and contrary to Rohloff's insistence
that 26" wheels must be built 2 cross, I made it 3 cross using 256mm
spokes, and it looks ok to me. The nipples come out of the rim at a
slightly greater than normal angle, but not as severely as a 4 cross

36
spoke wheel I have with a Sachs 7 speed hub.


What was your goal in lacing 3X?

2X on a Speedhub already has a lever arm larger than you
get with tangential lacing on a typical large-flange hub.
That is, Rohloff 2X is already overkill for torsional
stiffness. 3X just makes the angle at the rim worse,
without any significant benefit that I can think of.


Tom Ace


Yeah, I realize all that now. It was just my thick headedness thinking
that what Rohloff really meant was that 2 cross was the minimum, so I
went ahead and ordered the spokes for 3 cross. So not wanting to waste
perfectly good double butted spokes that are probably a length not
useable for any other application, I went ahead and built it.
Dan


--
Dan Burkhart

  #6  
Old December 28th 04, 02:10 AM
(Pete Cresswell)
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Per Dan Burkhart:
I weigh about 245, and I have been riding this bike for 5 years on the
original Mavic 223s with nary a broken spoke or a tacoed wheel, so I
thought the 517 would work ok. After hearing about your experience
though, I guess I better keep an eye on it.


245? Is this for road or MTB? If MTB and I could, I'd unlace that puppy right
now and return it....cut your losses while you can.
--
PeteCresswell
  #7  
Old December 28th 04, 02:23 AM
Dan Burkhart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


(Pete Cresswell) Wrote:
Per Dan Burkhart:
I weigh about 245, and I have been riding this bike for 5 years on

the
original Mavic 223s with nary a broken spoke or a tacoed wheel, so I
thought the 517 would work ok. After hearing about your experience
though, I guess I better keep an eye on it.


245? Is this for road or MTB? If MTB and I could, I'd unlace that
puppy right
now and return it....cut your losses while you can.
--
PeteCresswell

It's for MTB. I'll take it under advisement, thanks. I had no idea the
X517 was such a dud.
Dan


--
Dan Burkhart

  #8  
Old December 28th 04, 04:09 AM
daveornee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Dan Burkhart Wrote:
It's for MTB. I'll take it under advisement, thanks. I had no idea the
X517 was such a dud.
Dan



It's not a dud, but it is light weight and intended for rider + load
(not bicycle, but water, tools, etc.) of 90 kg or less.

A 3 cross build from a Rolhoff hub won't help and it might make it
tougher on the spokes.

F519 or XM 719 are rated at 115 kg.
D521 is got to be rated @ 125 kg or more, but it isn't listed any more
with Mavic's technical site.

Have you considered Velocity Synergy rim?


--
daveornee

  #9  
Old December 28th 04, 08:34 AM
Chalo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

(Pete Cresswell) wrote:
Per Dan Burkhart:
Just wondering if anyone else here has built them 3 cross and how

they
held up over time.


Haven't tried 3x, but how much do you weigh?

I'm about 220# and have toasted 3 517's laced 2x on the rear....so

now I use
something stronger in the rear.


At 350+ pounds, I felt that I needed something stronger than *any*
32-spoke wheel. (Rohloff claim that their hub makes a wheel that is as
strong as a 48-spoke rear wheel because it is dishless. I don't know
what measure of wheel strength they use to justify that claim. I
wanted 48 spokes anyway.)

So I set about adding some extra holes to the hub shell-- 8 extra on
the left and 16 extra on the right-- and laced up a 48-spoke wheel in a
crow's foot pattern:

http://img140.exs.cx/img140/328/bohmdriv6fo.jpg

That's 32 cross-2 spokes plus 16 radial ones, attached to a 750g Snow
Cat rim.

I used a 2.5 axis CNC mill to drill the hole pattern. I made a special
fixture plate to securely hold the opposite flange without marring it.
Thus I did not have to disassemble the hub for the machining operation.


I filled the 8 unused spoke holes with tiny screws, to make it easier
to keep track of the lacing pattern. The spokes worked out to be
unusal sizes-- 240mm and 220mm long-- so I had to have them cut to
order.

Drilling into a hub that expensive was an uneasy operation, but it all
went according to plan. I am confident that my hole pattern is held to
tighter tolerances than the original drilling.

Chalo Colina

  #10  
Old December 28th 04, 08:42 AM
gearoidmuar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

3 cross should be fine.
Radial spoking can cause problems if hub not strong enough to withstand
straight pull. The more oblique the pull, the more metal there is to resist.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Personal Wheel Building Questions - Lacing, Spoke Counts, Spoke Choices Appkiller Techniques 36 November 25th 04 05:42 PM
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 Mike Iglesias General 4 October 29th 04 07:11 AM
two odd wheel-building techniques [email protected] Techniques 63 August 26th 04 03:08 PM
Wheel Rebuilding TheObieOne3226 Unicycling 16 January 1st 04 10:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.