|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On 04/04/2019 01:07, Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:30:57 PM UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:16:16 PM UTC+1, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: It might have become "normal" for some people to commute daft distances; that's another part of the problem. When I worked at BP I had the longest commute in our lab at 12 miles and was the only one who cycled in. One evening, I got a lift home and it took me 15 minutes longer than my bike ride home and I was told by my driver that this was "normal". My bike ride took 25-35 minutes depending on the wind (never traffic) and by car, it could be over an hour in the evening. Some people think transport is spelled C-A-R. For the majority, "preferred transport" is indeed spelled as you suggest. Everything else is a distress purchase or one which is not chosen but isinstead forced on the traveller by circumstance or peevish officialdom. At the Uni we have a sports centre and some of my colleagues and myself use the facilities. The difference is I walk the 5 mins to the gym whilst my colleagues spend 10 mins driving + finding a parking space and then walking to the gym. Some people are either mentally lazy or they think 'successful' people use cars, or chisels, or little dogs. I remember a local councillor repeatedly remarking that a certain local gym always had lots of cars parked as close as possible to it, which he claimed was ironic, given that users of the gymn were presumably trying to get and stay fit and that this would have been slightly easier if each session was toppoed and tailed by a walk from the bnearest public car-park. He obviously thught that his observation was in some way funny. The area was (and still is) about as pikey as they come and anyone parking there - for any purpose at all -is still well-advised to be as near to their vehicle as possible so that a collective watch for theft and vandalism can be maintained. Being a ten minute walk away is not advisable. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 1:28:50 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
I remember a local councillor repeatedly remarking that a certain local gym always had lots of cars parked as close as possible to it, which he claimed was ironic, given that users of the gymn were presumably trying to get and stay fit and that this would have been slightly easier if each session was toppoed and tailed by a walk from the bnearest public car-park. He obviously thught that his observation was in some way funny. You need to wait at least 30 mins between ECT and using a computer. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On 04/04/2019 01:07, Simon Jester wrote:
Some people think transport is spelled C-A-R. At the Uni we have a sports centre and some of my colleagues and myself use the facilities. The difference is I walk the 5 mins to the gym whilst my colleagues spend 10 mins driving + finding a parking space and then walking to the gym. Some people are either mentally lazy or they think 'successful' people use cars, or chisels, or little dogs. There is an early evening game show on at the moment (House of Games). A question converned how far people walk in a year. My instant estimate was based on the fact that anything further than the fridge involves getting in a car. The official figure is half a mile a day. I was pretty close. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 1:07:20 AM UTC+1, Simon Jester wrote:
On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:30:57 PM UTC+1, wrote: On Wednesday, April 3, 2019 at 10:16:16 PM UTC+1, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: It might have become "normal" for some people to commute daft distances; that's another part of the problem. When I worked at BP I had the longest commute in our lab at 12 miles and was the only one who cycled in. One evening, I got a lift home and it took me 15 minutes longer than my bike ride home and I was told by my driver that this was "normal". My bike ride took 25-35 minutes depending on the wind (never traffic) and by car, it could be over an hour in the evening. Some people think transport is spelled C-A-R. At the Uni we have a sports centre and some of my colleagues and myself use the facilities. The difference is I walk the 5 mins to the gym whilst my colleagues spend 10 mins driving + finding a parking space and then walking to the gym. Some people are either mentally lazy or they think 'successful' people use cars, or chisels, or little dogs. Of course, I never needed a gym as I got over an hour of high intensity aerobic exercise every day. Some weeks I would ride around over 200 miles as I was a cycling club rider as well. Now I am retired, those years have meant that my body at age 60 is still in a decent state. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The British streets where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
JNugent wrote:
On 03/04/2019 22:18, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:51:41 GMT, JNugent wrote: On 17/02/2019 20:52, wrote: QUOTE: It's now faster to cycle than drive in some city centres as Britainâ?Ts roads become increasingly gridlocked, a report has found. London and Edinburgh are the two most congested cities in the UK, with drivers clocking up average speeds of only 7mph during the final mile of their journeys, the global traffic audit has revealed. It concluded that it has become â?~faster to ride a bike than drive or take the busâ?T for millions of motorists in Britain. It found that last year drivers in six UK cities â?" London, Edinburgh, Bristol, Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield â?" crawled along at an average speed of 10mph or less in the last mile of their journey. The average cyclist in cities travels at 9.6mph, according to traffic analysts Inrix, which conducted the study. ENDS. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...tish-cities-fa ster-cycle-drive.html I have corrected the thread title for you and for the Daily Mail. As written. it was the usual nonsense. I am confident that any competent driver in an ordinary car, behaving completely lawfully, could easily beat you or any other cyclist (on a bicycle) in a race - at any time of day or night - from one end of the Liverpool Ring Road* to the other. [* Approximately 11.3 miles, Millers Bridge / Balliol Road / Breeze Hill / Queens Drive / Menlove Avenue / Hillfoot Road / Speke Hall Road, northerly termination at Regent Road, southerly at junction with A561 Speke Boulevard. Almost all dual carriageway, almost all 40 mph limit.] This appears to be some kind of race. I bet you worked that out from the bit where I said "...any competent driver in an ordinary car ... could easily beat you or any other cyclist (on a bicycle) in a race...". But on dual carriageways. Quite normal. I can't see it as representative of the madness that is the daily commute into a city centre. You don't know anything about Liverpool and its dual-carriageway radial routes, then? Or about the fact that lots of peoples' commuting journeys take them aong non-radial routes (and even along ring road motorways)? xpost added. Why? He has this thing about xposts. Sad little man. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
The British streets where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On Thursday, April 4, 2019 at 1:12:36 AM UTC+1, JNugent wrote:
You don't know anything about Liverpool and its dual-carriageway radial routes, then? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aCbfMkh940Q |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
The British cities where it is now faster to CYCLE than drive
On 17/02/2019 20:52, wrote:
QUOTE: It's now faster to cycle than drive in some city centres as Britain’s roads become increasingly gridlocked, a report has found. London and Edinburgh are the two most congested cities in the UK, with drivers clocking up average speeds of only 7mph during the final mile of their journeys, the global traffic audit has revealed. It concluded that it has become ‘faster to ride a bike than drive or take the bus’ for millions of motorists in Britain. It found that last year drivers in six UK cities – London, Edinburgh, Bristol, Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield – crawled along at an average speed of 10mph or less in the last mile of their journey. The average cyclist in cities travels at 9.6mph, according to traffic analysts Inrix, which conducted the study. ENDS. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...cle-drive.html Old news. Way behind the times. In 1990's I used to work at the local college in Burton on Trent town center. It was 4 miles from my house. Guy I worked with gave me a 1970 5 speed "racer", well it had dropped bars and suicide levers. (Raleigh Rapier) Took me the same time by bike or Celica (only went as fast as the car in front). The only decider was, "is it raining?". And this was after they had opened the 2nd bridge. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Pet...ton_upon_Trent Was even worse before that but I had a motorcycle so wouldn't know. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly 80% of people want to see more segregated cycle lanes inBritish cities | Bod[_5_] | UK | 1 | November 14th 17 11:25 AM |
Why Fly or Drive When You Can Cycle? | Bret Cahill | UK | 42 | April 29th 16 11:21 AM |
don't cycle on the pavement and don't go faster than you can handle | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 37 | January 22nd 11 01:50 PM |
Pedestrians made to walk faster so that cars can go faster. | Doug[_3_] | UK | 91 | March 17th 09 08:37 AM |
The British drive on the wrong side in more ways than one | [email protected] | Techniques | 10 | June 7th 07 09:59 AM |