Watch the sleazy Limeys in action!

wrote:

And, IMO, is proof of the existance of UK AHZs. Who but a zealot would
expend such energy on a rather trivial subject?


Uhmmm, you?

"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths to
affect
the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at all to
work against it?

jtaylor wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths to
affect
the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at all to
work against it?

Hey, a**hole, you forgot to crosspost this to URC.That's a surprise

Your tacit approval of sleazy tactics is, of course, not a surprise.

wrote in message
oups.com...

jtaylor wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths to
affect
the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at
all to
work against it?

Hey, a**hole, you forgot to crosspost this to URC.That's a surprise


Insults are a sign that the poster using them has no other support.

To what lengths did _you_ go to prevent the passage of MHL's?

Did you do _anything_?

jtaylor wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths
to affect the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

There's no adult MHL in CA. (Oh, you meant a /child/ MHL? Why didn't you
SAY SO?!?)

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at
all to work against it?

If one's ever proposed around here /and/ I even hear about it, then I'll let
you know.

Flailor... LOL

jtaylor wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

jtaylor wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths to
affect
the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at
all to
work against it?

Hey, a**hole, you forgot to crosspost this to URC.That's a surprise
Your tacit approval of sleazy tactics is, of course, not a surprise.

Insults are a sign that the poster using them has no other support.


I haven't insulted you, "jtaylor", I have merely pointed out reality:
you are a crossposting troll who condones sleazy tactics.


To what lengths did _you_ go to prevent the passage of MHL's?

Did you do _anything_?


Thanks for admitting that you condone sleazy, unethical practices,
including voter fraud, in order to achieve your objectives. I think
that says it all about you and your fellow AHZs.

"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
news
jtaylor wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
...


Agreed...but it is rather funny/sad that they'd go to such lengths
to affect the outcome (or /effect/ their desired one).


And to what lengths did you go to attempt to prevent the MHL which was
passed in your state?

There's no adult MHL in CA. (Oh, you meant a /child/ MHL? Why didn't you
SAY SO?!?)

You have claimed that you are against MHLs - did you do _anything_ at
all to work against it?

If one's ever proposed around here /and/ I even hear about it, then I'll
let
you know.


So, you

a) have no problem with over 10 million of your state's residents being
required to wear a helmet by law;

b) didn't do anything to oppose it; and

c) don't think this is a mandatory helmet law? A quote from you: " We DON'T
have an MHL where I live."

As for letting me know about your legal problems, thank you; but perhaps you
would be better off directing your energies towards more local resources -
your state's legislators and the editors of your local newspapers.

On 14 Aug 2006 18:25:27 -0700, wrote:

Can you at least speak Yank WHILE you trash the Brits? Or are you too
inbred out there in the Ozarks to get the irony? Wot?

Were I Ozark born and bred, your words might sting. As it is, it's just
a cheap troll.

But it was in Yank English and you did bite.

Doug Taylor wrote:
On 14 Aug 2006 18:25:27 -0700, wrote:

Can you at least speak Yank WHILE you trash the Brits? Or are you
too inbred out there in the Ozarks to get the irony? Wot?

Were I Ozark born and bred, your words might sting. As it is, it's
just a cheap troll.

But it was in Yank English and you did bite.

Typical weasel tactic. Reply to an insult and you "took the bait"; say
nothing and you "lost the fight".

Bravo.

Doug Taylor a écrit :
On 14 Aug 2006 18:25:27 -0700, wrote:


Can you at least speak Yank WHILE you trash the Brits? Or are you too
inbred out there in the Ozarks to get the irony? Wot?

Were I Ozark born and bred, your words might sting. As it is, it's just
a cheap troll.


But it was in Yank English and you did bite.

Many people understand the minor dialect of a minority of that insular
community.