#1
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
Rod wrote:
Anyone ever kicked a car that's moving through a roundabout after failing to give way to you? It hurts more than I thought it would (although I only had half a second to consider whether it was wise or not..) I think I might revert back to my teenage riding habits, and use whatever surface is safest for me. I know it's not the right thing to do, and you'll probably give me **** for giving riders a bad name or whatever, but I'm sick of having close calls with cars. Many time I've avoided what would otherwise have resulted in a collision. Today was just another example. I'd prefer to risk a fine and trust myself with my pedestrian-avoiding skills than ride legally and trust drivers with their bike-avoiding skills (that which there appears to be little of..) My car-avoiding skills have kept be alive so far, but I'm not sure how many more chances I want to give them. Until I consider the roads safe for riding, I'll use them as little as possible. Greetings, The roads are indisputedly more dangerous, as 1.5 tonne chunks of metal can kill you more quickly, but footpaths are no place for cyclists, despite the legal strictures. Broken surfaces, kids, cars backing out of drives, ete, etc. If you don't exercise your right to occupy the road, motorists can assume you don't exist. Off-road cycle paths embody a very old Australian philosophy, `Get off the road ya mug'. Get out there and exercise your rights, and have a good laugh at them when we get a gridlock. Regards, Ray. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
Rod wrote:
Ray, you made a lot more sense than the first stupid reply.. Yes I agree with what you say, but I've given the roads too many chances.. I want to live. And live I will. Until that LandCruiser backs over you.. Or the Commodore racing into the side street doesn't notice you crossing the road because you're exiting from the footpath. etc.. hippy "Troll on!" |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
What's it like living in the future Rod ?
Your PC clock is set forward. If you are in the future please do one of the following : 1. Provide me with the new lotto numbers before it happens. 2. Ride on the roads and know where the cars are. If you are not living in the future do the following : Change your PC time so you don't jump the que of other posters. -- Tony ISH Remove the fish to reply --= This is a fish anti-spam device =-- `·.¸.·´¯`·...¸((((º "Rod" wrote in message ... Ray, you made a lot more sense than the first stupid reply.. Yes I agree with what you say, but I've given the roads too many chances.. I want to live. And live I will. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 at 07:09 GMT, ((((º (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: If you are not living in the future do the following : Change your PC time so you don't jump the que of other posters. His clock seems to be correct. Is your newsreader not smart enough to know about timezones? Ah, microsoft, gottit. Oh, and can I be the top post cop? Pretty Please? -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ Press any key to continue, any other key to abort -- thrillbert's code |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
TimC wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 at 07:09 GMT, ((((º (aka Bruce) was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: If you are not living in the future do the following : Change your PC time so you don't jump the que of other posters. His clock seems to be correct. Is your newsreader not smart enough to know about timezones? Ah, microsoft, gottit. I'm using Thunderbird and Rod's last three posts are dated 29th. My PC reckons today is the 28th. They are both computer-related so I don't trust either date hippy |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
hippy wrote:
I'm using Thunderbird and Rod's last three posts are dated 29th. My PC reckons today is the 28th. They are both computer-related so I don't trust either date Ditto with Knode. According to his message headers, Rod's computer's timezone is set to UTC -8 hours (somewhere in America). If he's on the east coast of Aust, it should be UTC + 10. John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
"Rod" wrote in message
... Anyone ever kicked a car that's moving through a roundabout after failing to give way to you? It hurts more than I thought it would (although I only had half a second to consider whether it was wise or not..) I think I might revert back to my teenage riding habits, and use whatever surface is safest for me. I know it's not the right thing to do, and you'll probably give me **** for giving riders a bad name or whatever, but I'm sick of having close calls with cars. Many time I've avoided what would otherwise have resulted in a collision. Today was just another example. I'd prefer to risk a fine and trust myself with my pedestrian-avoiding skills than ride legally and trust drivers with their bike-avoiding skills (that which there appears to be little of..) My car-avoiding skills have kept be alive so far, but I'm not sure how many more chances I want to give them. Until I consider the roads safe for riding, I'll use them as little as possible. I am 57 years old and after riding casually for ten years have taken to commuting to work daily. What I'm saying is my opinion, and not necessarily what is correct. It is rare that anyone gives me right of way at a roundabout. Oddly enough, the only few times I've had a car slow down when approaching a roundabout with me just entering it, was when that car was on my right - when arguably he had the right of way. As far as coming up behind me, well, I've yet to find any car that doesn't try to run me off the road. The only way I've been able to prevent that is riding smack in the middle of the road as I enter the roundabout (you need to do that gradually and resonably ahead of the roundabout). Often it's either that or get off your bike and wait until scores of cars go through it. I even had a lady driver who almost mounted the centre of the roundabout in her obsession not to let me through before her. The best way to ride a bike is to accept that you have no rights whatever. If you're on the road and there's no bike track, then you should be on a bike track and not stuffing up traffic. If you are on a bike track, then you're not paying for the bike track, as drivers pay for the road through their registration, so you still have no rights. Every driver has seen or heard of cyclists who ride three abreast, or go through red lights, so you by default are deemed to ride 3 abreast and going through red lights, even if you have never done that. As a cyclist you are scum - a parasite who doesn't pay his way and who obstructs decent drivers in getting to where they are going..... I hope you have taken the above in the cynicism I have written it. As far as using the footpath, I have often done that when I feel the risk of getting killed if on the road has become unacceptable. Just remember that if you do ride on the footpath, you could not only be held accountable for hitting some pedestrian, but you could get hit by an unseen car pulling out of a driveway. They you most definitely have no rights. I have found that once you get into a mindset that you *expect* drivers not to give you any right of way, that can make for a more pleasant bike ride. At least then you don't get mad at anyone. Also once you accept that only once in a while a driver will be out to get you, you're much more at peace. As I said, this is my opinion, and I may be corrected. Henry. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 at 09:23 GMT, John Henderson (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: hippy wrote: I'm using Thunderbird and Rod's last three posts are dated 29th. My PC reckons today is the 28th. Odd: I get: Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:35:28 -0800 They are both computer-related so I don't trust either date Ditto with Knode. According to his message headers, Rod's computer's timezone is set to UTC -8 hours (somewhere in America). If he's on the east coast of Aust, it should be UTC + 10. Or he's posting on a machine that is based in the US. Not likely, because OE doesn't work over ssh, however, his server could be rewriting headers for him. Um. Bikes. Yeah. Bikes are cool. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ E = MC ** 2 +- 3db |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Footpaths for me
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 at 09:42 GMT, hemyd (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: I am 57 years old and after riding casually for ten years have taken to commuting to work daily. What I'm saying is my opinion, and not necessarily what is correct. That's odd. My opinion is always correct It is rare that anyone gives me right of way at a roundabout. Oddly enough, the only few times I've had a car slow down when approaching a roundabout with me just entering it, was when that car was on my right - when arguably he had the right of way. Arguably? Not much arguable about it. The law says you must give way to anything already on the roundabout. This usually translates to giving way to your right, and if I understand the situation properly, that is what you were intending on doing. 'Course, I get the sitation you describe occur about monthly - I just give them a bit of a glare when they wave me through, because they screwed up my timing. As far as coming up behind me, well, I've yet to find any car that doesn't try to run me off the road. The only way I've been able to prevent that is riding smack in the middle of the road as I enter the roundabout (you need to do that gradually and resonably ahead of the roundabout). You definitely need to assert yourself more. Taking the middle of the lane is called "claiming the lane", and is a normal part of using intersections, roundabouts, etc, from the point of view of most regular commuters and road users (bar yourself, it seems). I typically go through roundabouts much much faster than cars anyway, as long as it is safe for me to do so, so cars never get the chance to overtake me, except if I am going uphill, in which case I will certainly be in the middle of the lane. At other times, I will choose the line that suits me best. Maybe it helps to have a helmet mirror. With the mirror, I know just when to pull out into the middle of the lane -- lately, I've been pulling out further and further back if I see a car coming, because it is increasingly becoming the norm that a car will overtake when there is bugger all room left before the intersection, and end up sitting there for ages because they don't realise it is legal to turn into a left lane when only the right lane is occupied by traffic. I can only recall one sitation in which someone failed to give way to me when I was on a roundabout - they barged through at 50km/h, barely slowing down from their 60km/h in the 50km/h zone, and I was turning right with my right arm extended. In those sitations, it pays to be alert - it was obvious they weren't going to stop, so I slammed the brakes on - they missed my front wheel by about 5-10cm. Don't think they saw me, even after my ranting and raving. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ Imagine what a tipped over tractor-trailer formerly full of potatoes looks like. Not half as messy as a truckload of oranges. Or a hovercraft full of eels. -- Tanuki on ASR |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycling on footpaths. Is now OK | Lisci | UK | 15 | July 25th 04 06:33 PM |
Riding on footpaths? - NSW laws | marc_9 | Australia | 13 | July 3rd 04 09:30 AM |
Cycling on public footpaths | al_Mossah | UK | 45 | January 15th 04 10:35 AM |
Bikes on footpaths - damn... | Alan Erskine | Australia | 162 | October 13th 03 10:52 PM |
Legal interpretation of riding on footpaths in Victoria | Alan Erskine | Australia | 32 | September 16th 03 02:54 PM |