More driver wriggling

Literally in this case. :-)
QUOTE:

A MOTORIST stopped at Cross Hands for driving the wrong way along a dual
carriageway had a sex device up his bottom, a judge heard. Shane Roblin, 42,
was naked from the waist down and "clearly intoxicated". But he would only
tell officers: "I'm just out for a spin."

Roblin admitted dangerous driving and refusing to provide a sample for
testing. He was jailed for ten months and banned from driving for three
years.

Christine Jones, prosecuting, told Swansea Crown Court horrified police
driving east on the A48 dual carriageway in the early hours of September 27,
saw Roblin's Transit van heading towards them. They turned on sirens and
blue lights, but Roblin responded by turning off hisownlights and driving
straight past. Three miles later, at the Cross Hands roundabout, police were
able to stop Roblin at a roadblock.

An officer who opened the door of the van saw a battery rolling around on
the driver's seat. Further investigation revealed a battery pack and a wire
leading to an egg-shaped sex aid inserted into Roblin's bottom.

Roblin, of Brynhyfryd Road, Gorseinon, Swansea, later turned violent at
Ammanford police station and had to be placed into handcuffs and leg irons.
His barrister, Carina Hughes, said he was ashamed and embarrassed. "He
cannot explain why he was in such a state of undress.

"He assures me that alcohol was not a factor that night, although alcohol
has been a serious issue in the past. Nor had he taken any illegal
substance, as far as he knows."

Judge Richard Twomlow said Roblin's behaviour had not been "terribly
logical" and he was clearly intoxicated by something. "You failed to
provide a specimen for testing.

You don't want anyone to know why or how you were intoxicated and you had a
sexual aid between your legs.

"This was bizarre and dangerous behaviour," he added.

http://www.southwalesguardian.co.uk/...for_10_months/

--
Simon Mason

On 28/01/2012 05:17, Simon Mason wrote:

Literally in this case. :-)
QUOTE:

A MOTORIST stopped at Cross Hands for driving the wrong way along a dual
carriageway had a sex device up his bottom, a judge heard. Shane Roblin, 42,
was naked from the waist down and "clearly intoxicated". But he would only
tell officers: "I'm just out for a spin."

An unusual case.

Equally as bizarre as the man who was fined a few years ago for having sex
with his bicycle (in a hotel room, in plain view of a chambermaid or other
hotel employee).

Not so much wriggling in this case for obvious reasons :-)

QUOTE:

Officers flagged down Zoltan Lakatos, 38, and discovered four children in
the boot of his Audi A4. The two girls aged 11 and five and two boys of 10
and seven were lying on top of each other in the uninsured vehicle,
magistrates heard. On further inspection, police found two women and a man,
a child of three and a nine-month-old baby sitting on the back seat. Another
woman was sitting in the front alongside Lakatos, who was at the wheel,
bringing the total headcount in the car to 11.

When officers stressed the dangers of having so many people in his car,
Lakatos replied: "It doesn't matter, they are only children." The
father-of-four was stopped in Leicester one morning in June last year, the
city's magistrates' court was told. Lakatos, who did not appear in court,
was convicted of using a motor vehicle to carry passengers in such a way as
to create a danger of injury to them, and of driving without insurance. The
Hungarian, who lives in Belgrave, Leicestershire, was fined a total of
£1,325 and banned from driving for a year.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ml--SimonMason

"Simon Mason" wrote in message
...

Judge Richard Twomlow said Roblin's behaviour had not been "terribly
logical" and he was clearly intoxicated by something. "You failed to
provide a specimen for testing.

You don't want anyone to know why or how you were intoxicated and you had a
sexual aid between your legs.

"This was bizarre and dangerous behaviour," he added.

Having seen a photo of Simon Mason's bike which clearly shows his saddle,
and considering the amount he says he drinks, I would say that being ****ed
and having a sex toy stuck up his arse seems to be the norm for him when he
is riding his bike.

Here's a picture lest there be any doubt:

http://www.thisishullandeastriding.c...ail/story.html

On 28/01/2012 17:42, Simon Mason wrote:

Not so much wriggling in this case for obvious reasons :-)
QUOTE:
Officers flagged down Zoltan Lakatos, 38, and discovered four children in
the boot of his Audi A4. The two girls aged 11 and five and two boys of 10
and seven were lying on top of each other in the uninsured vehicle,
magistrates heard. On further inspection, police found two women and a man,
a child of three and a nine-month-old baby sitting on the back seat. Another
woman was sitting in the front alongside Lakatos, who was at the wheel,
bringing the total headcount in the car to 11.
When officers stressed the dangers of having so many people in his car,
Lakatos replied: "It doesn't matter, they are only children." The
father-of-four was stopped in Leicester one morning in June last year, the
city's magistrates' court was told. Lakatos, who did not appear in court,
was convicted of using a motor vehicle to carry passengers in such a way as
to create a danger of injury to them, and of driving without insurance. The
Hungarian, who lives in Belgrave, Leicestershire, was fined a total of
£1,325 and banned from driving for a year.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...ml--SimonMason

There really ought to be laws against all those things.

Well, it sure makes a change from drivers spitting at cyclists -
driving seems to be really stressful and not fun at all.
Can't see why, I love driving..

QUOTE:
A man has been banned from driving for 28 days after he spat at
another motorist. Mohammed Shabaz, 25, of Prospect Street in
Huddersfield, admitted spitting on Catherine McCullagh’s hand and
dress after their cars narrowly avoided a crash on the ring road
around Huddersfield. Shabaz’s solicitor Philip Cockcroft told
Calderdale magistrates that Shabaz has behaved recklessly and that he
had been having “a bad day at the office” when the offence occurred.
As well as the ban, he must do 120 hours unpaid work and fined £165

http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news...oman_1_4184050

--
Simon Mason

The classic driver wriggle - "I have no idea who could possibly have been
driving officer"

QUOTE:

Driving home after a night out, a man crashed his car into a wall in Frome
while nearly two-and-a-half times over the drink-drive limit.

Police were called to the scene in Butts Hill shortly before 4am and found
Mark Rothwell Johnson, who had wandered away from the accident. After
failing a roadside breath test he was arrested and charged.

Johnson, 34, of Lower New Road, Cheddar, pleaded guilty to driving with
excess alcohol at Frome on December 17 last year when he appeared before
South Somerset magistrates.

Prosecutor Sanchia Pereira said that police received a call at 3.50am to say
that a man had crashed his Toyota car into a wall at Butts Hill, Frome, and
left the scene.

"Officers went to the location and found Johnson about 500 metres away, who
appeared to be drunk," she said.

"He failed a roadside breath test and was taken to the police station where
he took a further test which gave a reading of 85mcg of alcohol in 100ml of
breath. The legal limit is 35mcg.

"During an interview he was unable to say whether he had been the driver at
the time of the accident, but has now accepted he was by pleading guilty."

The magistrates were told that Johnson had been on a night out with a friend
in Frome, left his car keys at his friend's house and had no idea how he
came to be driving the car.

He assumed he had argued with his friend, had gone back to his house and got
the keys to drive home.

The court heard that the defendant was absolutely mortified to find himself
in court and felt he had let his family and friends down.

He was disqualified from driving for 20 months, fined £500 and ordered to
pay £85 costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

http://www.thisissomerset.co.uk/Driv...ail/story.html

--
Simon Mason

On 24/02/2012 19:18, Simon Mason wrote:
The classic driver wriggle - "I have no idea who could possibly have been
driving officer"

QUOTE:

Driving home after a night out, a man crashed his car into a wall in Frome
while nearly two-and-a-half times over the drink-drive limit.

Police were called to the scene in Butts Hill shortly before 4am and found
Mark Rothwell Johnson, who had wandered away from the accident. After
failing a roadside breath test he was arrested and charged.

Johnson, 34, of Lower New Road, Cheddar, pleaded guilty to driving with
excess alcohol at Frome on December 17 last year when he appeared before
South Somerset magistrates.

Prosecutor Sanchia Pereira said that police received a call at 3.50am to say
that a man had crashed his Toyota car into a wall at Butts Hill, Frome, and
left the scene.

"Officers went to the location and found Johnson about 500 metres away, who
appeared to be drunk," she said.

"He failed a roadside breath test and was taken to the police station where
he took a further test which gave a reading of 85mcg of alcohol in 100ml of
breath. The legal limit is 35mcg.

"During an interview he was unable to say whether he had been the driver at
the time of the accident, but has now accepted he was by pleading guilty."

That sums to:

"I was unfit to answer questions at the time because I was so drunk. Having
sobered up, I am now in a position to answer your questions".

So what's wrong with that? Do you think that the police ought to be legally
able to interrogate anyone who is incapacitated, for whatever reason?

On Feb 24, 7:18*pm, "Simon Mason"
wrote:

The magistrates were told that Johnson had been on a night out with a friend
in Frome, left his car keys at his friend's house and had no idea how he
came to be driving the car.

He assumed he had argued with his friend, had gone back to his house and got
the keys to drive home.

He had "no idea" as to how he ended up in his car?
Pathetic - is that the best wriggle he could come up with?
What is wrong with "it's a fair cop, Guv?"

--
Simon Mason

"Dave - Cyclists VOR" wrote in message
...

On 25/02/2012 00:13, JNugent wrote:
On 24/02/2012 19:18, Simon Mason wrote:
The classic driver wriggle - "I have no idea who could possibly have been
driving officer"

QUOTE:

Driving home after a night out, a man crashed his car into a wall in
Frome
while nearly two-and-a-half times over the drink-drive limit.

Police were called to the scene in Butts Hill shortly before 4am and
found
Mark Rothwell Johnson, who had wandered away from the accident. After
failing a roadside breath test he was arrested and charged.

Johnson, 34, of Lower New Road, Cheddar, pleaded guilty to driving with
excess alcohol at Frome on December 17 last year when he appeared before
South Somerset magistrates.

Prosecutor Sanchia Pereira said that police received a call at 3.50am
to say
that a man had crashed his Toyota car into a wall at Butts Hill,
Frome, and
left the scene.

"Officers went to the location and found Johnson about 500 metres
away, who
appeared to be drunk," she said.

"He failed a roadside breath test and was taken to the police station
where
he took a further test which gave a reading of 85mcg of alcohol in
100ml of
breath. The legal limit is 35mcg.

"During an interview he was unable to say whether he had been the
driver at
the time of the accident, but has now accepted he was by pleading
guilty."

That sums to:

"I was unfit to answer questions at the time because I was so drunk.
Having sobered up, I am now in a position to answer your questions".

So what's wrong with that? Do you think that the police ought to be
legally able to interrogate anyone who is incapacitated, for whatever
reason?

Its unlikely Mason was sober when those three policemen interviewed him
about his cyber stalker.

It's also unlikely he is sober at anytime - that is, if his drinking
exploits were to be believed.