|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists and pedestrians
To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers.
Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists andpedestrians
On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote:
To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving And "*every* collision is a *car driver's* poor driving". |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists andpedestrians
On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote:
"... It's pretty clear what probably happened ..." You don't say. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists and pedestrians
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT), Alycidon
wrote: Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. Like this one? :- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MckKqYHoLJI |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists and pedestrians
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 10:55:11 UTC+1, Bod wrote:
On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote: To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving And "*every* collision is a *car driver's* poor driving". Yes - not paying attention to what is in front of them, usually. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...car-front.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists andpedestrians
On 02/09/2015 14:38, Peter Parry wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2015 02:46:14 -0700 (PDT), Alycidon wrote: Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. Like this one? :- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MckKqYHoLJI Nothing to do with a Google car, but yeh the cyclist needs to up his game and pay more attention. What a plonker cyclist. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Why Google's self-driving cars will be great for cyclists andpedestrians
On 02/09/2015 14:47, Alycidon wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 10:55:11 UTC+1, Bod wrote: On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote: To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving And "*every* collision is a *car driver's* poor driving". Yes - not paying attention to what is in front of them, usually. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...car-front.html Like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MckKqYHoLJI |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
OT Post by village idiot
On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote:
To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
OT Post by village idiot’s bag man
On 02/09/2015 10:55, Bod wrote:
On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote: To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving And "*every* collision is a *car driver's* poor driving". |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
OT Post by village idiot
On 02/09/2015 14:47, Alycidon wrote:
On Wednesday, 2 September 2015 10:55:11 UTC+1, Bod wrote: On 02/09/2015 10:46, Alycidon wrote: To date, Google's cars have travelled nearly 2 million miles but have only been involved in 14 minor collisions -- all of which were other drivers' fault. Google has detailed them, and they reveal the many alarming tendencies of human drivers. Most of these crashes involve Google's cars being rear-ended through no fault of their own. It's pretty clear what probably happened he The driver was distracted, possibly looking down at a cellphone. If Google's car were a cyclist, he or she might be dead. http://www.vox.com/2015/8/31/9222959...r-self-driving And "*every* collision is a *car driver's* poor driving". Yes - not paying attention to what is in front of them, usually. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...car-front.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Germany Already Has Self Driving Cars | Bret Cahill | UK | 2 | January 27th 15 03:16 AM |
Video shows motorist deliberately driving into pedestrians on pavement | The Medicated Handyman[_2_] | UK | 9 | October 21st 11 10:07 AM |
when will cyclists learn that pedestrian crossings are for .....pedestrians, not cyclists | Mrcheerful[_2_] | UK | 7 | August 12th 10 07:08 AM |
Most Dangerous: Cars, Dogs, Kids on Wheels, Other Bikers, Pedestrians? | Ziactrice | General | 16 | April 22nd 06 02:48 PM |
Priority to be given to pedestrians and cyclists over cars? | Richard Bates | UK | 23 | October 30th 03 11:11 PM |