Would the IOC have ever brought this up if...........

The whole double drug test thing is pretty simple.

Aug race (Olympic) win IOC event
Sep race (Vuelta TT) win UCI event

Phonak revealed the news that 'A' samples from both events failed.
Both will get a 'B' sample testing. Although only days after the
Vuelta TT win, it is more than a month after the Athens Gold Metal
Heist.

IOC (International Obscene Cartel) says nothing for a whole month.
They only react to Phonak's release. Then, they convieniently trash
their 'B' sample. Some reports say dropped on the floor, other more
reliable sources say the ill-fated 'B' sample had been ruined when it
was frozen. This by a bunch of supposed experts?

So, despite everyone's best effort to bust a cheating stealing thief,
including his own team, the IOC once again proves us that they are in
such a competition with the Ambassadors of the United Nations for the
most bloated good old boys club for the elite who run the show, and
that no scandal will be allowed to happen without their blessing.
That's the BILLION$ talking.

Too bad the poor cousin UCI guys, who have been seen riding their
cruiser bicycles to meetings in a tent in the Swiss country side don't
march to the beat of the same drum. They have bigger worries, as their
poorly thought out Pro Tour debacle will be their undoing, until
someone (they are working on it) creates a new governing body for
international pro cycling.

So a two year UCI ban is now the only option. The UCI shoots
themselves right in the wallet, or I mean, there own feet.

Back to the original question. Based on the fact that the Olympics
hid a result for over a month that takes 2 hours MAX to figure out,
and only acnowledged it after it became news, and then with the whole
world watching, got rid of the 'B' sample very nicely, thank you.
Would this Olympic moment ever been revealed if Tyler skipped the
Vuelta, like he should have?

crit amateur

"crit pro" ...
The whole double drug test thing is pretty simple.

Aug race (Olympic) win IOC event
Sep race (Vuelta TT) win UCI event

You should be a novelist.
You have too much time on your hands to write so much crap.

-Ken

you have to much time on your hands to write such crap naw, u spend
your time wisely. like the man said,- why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????

wrote:

you have to much time on your hands to write such crap naw, u spend
your time wisely. like the man said,- why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????


Probably ran out of peanuts to feed crit pro, who pedals the generator
that powers the contraption they use for testing.

In article ,
says...
why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????

did the IOC wait until the news broke to test the B sample or did they
test it right after the A sample but not report it? Two very different things.
If they waited to test the B sample, there is something wrong. If they did not
report it because they screwed up the B sample, then they did nothing wrong.
Why would they report something that according to their rules is not a
positive?
------------
Alex

wrote in message ...
you have to much time on your hands to write such crap naw, u spend
your time wisely. like the man said,- why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????

That's easy. Tye IOC does not release any result unless both the "A"
and "B" samples test positive. The "B" sample was destroyed by
freezing. Therefore the IOC would never have been any public
statement but for the fact Phonac announced the result.


ray

Ray wrote:

That's easy. Tye IOC does not release any result unless both the "A"
and "B" samples test positive. The "B" sample was destroyed by
freezing. Therefore the IOC would never have been any public
statement but for the fact Phonac announced the result.

But they inform the rider and his team when the A sample turns positive. What
makes me think they knew they had screwed up the B sample and were just trying
to cover it up. When they learned about the Vuelta positive, they were forced to
report on the Oympics test too. Think about it, a negative in Athens and a
positive in the Vuelta would make Tyler look even more suspect.

Jenko

wrote in message ...
you have to much time on your hands to write such crap naw, u spend
your time wisely. like the man said,- why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????

Wow -- an anonymous Web TVer... A much lower life form than AOLers.

Wow..an anonymous web tv'r...a much lower life form than AOLers. why
dont you add - i use a computer to get online and you don't, na na na na
na

Ray wrote:

wrote in message ...

you have to much time on your hands to write such crap naw, u spend
your time wisely. like the man said,- why did the olympics sit on theirs
so long, when would we have heard about it???????


That's easy. Tye IOC does not release any result unless both the "A"
and "B" samples test positive. The "B" sample was destroyed by
freezing. Therefore the IOC would never have been any public
statement but for the fact Phonac announced the result.

And we'd never have known that the B sample was inconclusive...