|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.
On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote:
On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote: On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote: On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: Simon Jester wrote: Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: MrCheerful wrote: https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779 But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50. As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first name. Stupid does as stupid rides. You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent. They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling NG. Sad. Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists? This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING. Very good! That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here, you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in staying on-topic, are they? Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in "uk.rec.CYCLING". If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of riding the bike it is clearly on topic. Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part in the event described it is plainly not on topic. Says who? This is not a difficult distinction. It isn't. But neither is it a relevant one. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.
On 18/04/2019 03:00, JNugent wrote:
On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote: On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote: On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote: On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: Simon Jester wrote: Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: MrCheerful wrote: https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779 But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50. As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first name. Stupid does as stupid rides. You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent. They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling NG. Sad. Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists? This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING. Very good! That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here, you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in staying on-topic, are they? Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in "uk.rec.CYCLING". If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of riding the bike it is clearly on topic. Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part in the event described it is plainly not on topic. Says who? Anybody can say so. This is not a difficult distinction. It isn't. But neither is it a relevant one. Your opinions are usually of no worth. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.
On 18/04/2019 08:09, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:25:10 GMT, "Mr Pounder Esquire" wrote: Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:05:06 GMT, Simon Jester wrote: On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 6:25:49 PM UTC+1, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: MrCheerful wrote: https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news...ews/cyclist-fi n ed- hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779 But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50. As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first name. Stupid does as stupid rides. You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent. They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling NG. Sad. Oh look! It's the sad **** who posted his driving lessons and his **** ups in the driving group many years ago. Nobody could help him. Oh how we laughed! He will always be a road cockroach on a bicycle as he is too stupid to drive a car. This group takes the slash out of cyclists. If you don't like what you read, **** off to the boring moderated group. You will not be missed. Show us yer chisel. Yes show it to us. Or are you ashamed of the amount of blood, gunk, turds and snot that is dripping from it? |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Reckless cyclist has to pay compo to pedestrian he mowed down.
On 18/04/2019 09:31, TMS320 wrote:
On 18/04/2019 03:00, JNugent wrote: On 17/04/2019 19:03, TMS320 wrote: On 17/04/2019 10:28, JNugent wrote: On 17/04/2019 09:24, TMS320 wrote: On 17/04/2019 00:28, JNugent wrote: On 16/04/2019 22:01, Kerr-Mudd,John wrote: Simon Jester wrote: Mr Pounder Esquire wrote: MrCheerful wrote: https://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/news/stoke-on-trent-news/cyclist-fined-hitting-pedestrian-town-2767779 But, he will be on the dole and won't have the £50. As for writing a letter, most cyclists can't even spell their first name. Stupid does as stupid rides. You two should share Onanism tips with Nugent. They seem to think it "fun" to post annoyinfg stuff in a cycling NG. Sad. Why does it annoy you to be told of the exploits of cyclists? This NG is called uk.rec.CYCLING. Very good! That, of course, is the very reason for my question. Whatever else you may think of Messrs Pounder and Cheerful and their posts here, you have to admit that they are almost always on-topic for a cycling newsgroup. Not every one of their opponents are as punctilious in staying on-topic, are they? Well, unless you have a different explanation - perhaps along the lines that cyclists' misdeeds are somehow off-topic in "uk.rec.CYCLING". If the misdeed (or other event of note) happened in the course of riding the bike it is clearly on topic. Otherwise, when the bicycle is used for transport but takes no part in the event described it is plainly not on topic. Says who? Anybody can say so. But not convincingly. This is not a difficult distinction. It isn't. But neither is it a relevant one. Your opinions are usually of no worth. That's how much I charge for them. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Police hunt cyclist that mowed down a pedestrian | Mrcheerful | UK | 3 | February 5th 15 02:29 AM |
Slap on the wrist for pavement cyclist that mowed down pedestrian | Mrcheerful | UK | 11 | January 17th 14 08:11 PM |
Update on the cyclist that mowed down the child on the crossing | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 7 | August 1st 13 07:00 PM |
Racing cyclist with previous, mowed down and killed another racer | Mrcheerful[_3_] | UK | 20 | June 12th 13 09:45 PM |
He mowed down a cyclist | Bertie Wooster[_2_] | UK | 9 | June 24th 12 06:03 PM |