A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 24th 06, 07:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
SteveT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry

This subject has probably already been discussed here, but I can't find
the specific info I'm looking for, so I thought I'd give it a try
anyway.

I've been using a Dura Ace aluminum seatpost (27.2 x 270 mm) on a
custom-made steel frame with compact-geometry and I've always noticed a
little bit of seatpost flex that can be a bit annoying at times. I have
the Dura Ace post extended just shy of the "max' allowable line. Even
though the seat post flex ends up providing a nice plush ride, I'm
thinking of switching over to a graphite post that's been designed more
towards a compact frame geometry, like a 350 mm Ritchey carbon post.
Any opinions on graphite posts or opinions on relative seat post
stiffness? Hate to change seatposts and find out the new one is no
stiffer than the old one. Now I understand why 31.6 mm seatpost are
becoming more common.

Thanks,
Steve T

Ads
  #2  
Old December 24th 06, 01:08 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Michael Warner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 284
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry

On 23 Dec 2006 23:38:11 -0800, SteveT wrote:

Any opinions on graphite posts


Wear disposable latex gloves when you handle them, or they'll
smudge your hands. They're like giant 5B art pencils.

--
Home page: http://members.westnet.com.au/mvw
  #3  
Old December 24th 06, 01:59 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Qui si parla Campagnolo Qui si parla Campagnolo is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by CycleBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,259
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry


SteveT wrote:
This subject has probably already been discussed here, but I can't find
the specific info I'm looking for, so I thought I'd give it a try
anyway.

I've been using a Dura Ace aluminum seatpost (27.2 x 270 mm) on a
custom-made steel frame with compact-geometry and I've always noticed a
little bit of seatpost flex that can be a bit annoying at times. I have
the Dura Ace post extended just shy of the "max' allowable line. Even
though the seat post flex ends up providing a nice plush ride, I'm
thinking of switching over to a graphite post that's been designed more
towards a compact frame geometry, like a 350 mm Ritchey carbon post.
Any opinions on graphite posts or opinions on relative seat post
stiffness? Hate to change seatposts and find out the new one is no
stiffer than the old one. Now I understand why 31.6 mm seatpost are
becoming more common.

Thanks,
Steve T


I really doubt you are feeling that tube of aluminum flex. If it were,
it would eventually break. Perhaps the saddle rails, but not that tube
of 250mm of aluminum.

  #4  
Old December 24th 06, 06:45 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Ron Ruff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,304
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry


SteveT wrote:
Any opinions on graphite posts or opinions on relative seat post
stiffness? Hate to change seatposts and find out the new one is no
stiffer than the old one. Now I understand why 31.6 mm seatpost are
becoming more common.


Larger diameter allows it to be *stronger* and still light. I did some
calculations awhile back and concluded that a very long post (like
400mm) could flex enough that a sensitive person might notice it, but
compared to flex in the saddle it is still very small. I doubt that you
are perceiving flex in that post.

Carbon posts tend to be more flexible than aluminum posts. If you want
to try a stiffer post I'd look at heavy duty aluminum ones with a thick
wall.

  #5  
Old December 29th 06, 04:42 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Mike Krueger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 43
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry

SteveT wrote:

I've been using a Dura Ace aluminum seatpost (27.2 x 270 mm) on a
custom-made steel frame with compact-geometry and I've always noticed a
little bit of seatpost flex that can be a bit annoying at times. I have
the Dura Ace post extended just shy of the "max' allowable line. Even
though the seat post flex ends up providing a nice plush ride, I'm
thinking of switching over to a graphite post that's been designed more
towards a compact frame geometry, like a 350 mm Ritchey carbon post.
Any opinions on graphite posts or opinions on relative seat post
stiffness? Hate to change seatposts and find out the new one is no
stiffer than the old one. Now I understand why 31.6 mm seatpost are
becoming more common.


I switched from the Easton EC-70 carbon post on my Litespeed to their
EA-70 Taperwall aluminum post, which is similar to your Dura Ace post.
I find the bead-blasted aluminum post to be more rigid and durable than
the carbon version, which would slip down in the frame under load.
Nashbar has the 300mm EA-70 posts on blowout right now for $32.99,
which is a fantastic bargain.

  #6  
Old December 29th 06, 02:28 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Tim McNamara
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,945
Default Seat post stiffness: Compact frame geometry

In article .com,
"SteveT" wrote:

This subject has probably already been discussed here, but I can't
find the specific info I'm looking for, so I thought I'd give it a
try anyway.

I've been using a Dura Ace aluminum seatpost (27.2 x 270 mm) on a
custom-made steel frame with compact-geometry and I've always noticed
a little bit of seatpost flex that can be a bit annoying at times. I
have the Dura Ace post extended just shy of the "max' allowable line.
Even though the seat post flex ends up providing a nice plush ride,
I'm thinking of switching over to a graphite post that's been
designed more towards a compact frame geometry, like a 350 mm Ritchey
carbon post. Any opinions on graphite posts or opinions on relative
seat post stiffness? Hate to change seatposts and find out the new
one is no stiffer than the old one. Now I understand why 31.6 mm
seatpost are becoming more common.


Are you certain that it is seat post flex you are feeling and not saddle
flex? How have you determined it is the seatpost flexing?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there supposed to be an advantage to Compact Frame Geometry? Colin Campbell Techniques 32 July 20th 06 05:49 AM
Should I buy a bicycle with a compact frame geometry? Robert Lee Techniques 6 June 9th 06 12:40 PM
compact geometry [email protected] General 1 March 28th 05 05:49 PM
Compact frame vs Traditional Frame geometry Dennis Vaughn Techniques 39 September 4th 03 02:10 AM
Merits of compact geometry frames vs "classic" geometry??? ari Techniques 8 July 17th 03 03:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.