French Get A Dose Of The New Lance Armstrong

GaryG wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote in message
news
RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:59:50 GMT, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

David L. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:53:20 -0500, ZeMascouflatte wrote:

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these
days. you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the
village idiot,

Actually, we didn't. In 2000, the court, thanks to those appoined
by Poppi, did.

Bush 41 "appoined" the Democratic election officials in Florida --
including the Democrat who designed the ballot? He "appoined" a
majority of Supreme Court justices?

In 2004, Diebold did.

Blogcrap.

Gore lost. Kerry lost.

Get over it.

Why?

Let 'em wallow in their perceived injustice, stew and fume over the
wrongs of this evil corrupt world filled with 10,000 overlapping
conspiracies to keep the wealthiest, healthiest most free people in
the history of humanity in chains.

In the meanwhile, the Democrat party may just learn to dump them by
the wayside and return to being a legitimate force in national
politics.

I agree with everything you say. HOWEVER, the fact that they can't
"get over it" is manifested in the overt (as well as covert)
undermining of the Bush Administration /and/ the US military and
intelligence agencies in "really important ways" (think life and
death...literally). There are many who hate Bush so much that they
actively root /against/ US interests just because it harms his
presidency (and because they lust for power themselves). It's
shameless...AND shameful.

It sounds like you've spent too much time listening to Faux News
and/or Rush. Many of the folks opposed to Bush and his policies are
opposed on legitimate political and moral grounds (e.g., an
unnecessary war that's costing trillions of dollars, and thousands of
lives).

Aside from a few academic nutcases, we do *not" root against the US.
The fact that you think we do just illustrates the extent to which
you've been brainwashed.

Why did you think I meant you, Gary? There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a horrible
speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/) and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The far-far
left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking the Democratic
party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Now get back to AM-B where you belong!

eg

"Mike Kruger" wrote in message
. com...
"B. Lafferty" wrote in message news:jBUwg.2163

Now let's not paint with too broad a brush, OK? And please be kind to
culturally challenged US citizens (Canadians are civilized Americans),
most of who do not know where France or Iraq are and that they are
different.
I doubt if there is a single member of the U.S. armed forces who can't
distinguish Paris from Baghdad.


Talk about a broad brush. There are many members of the Military that follow
Pro cycling. Not all think and act like the stereotype that you subscribe
to. At a younger age I completely changed my view of the military after
talking with some officers. They are not warmonger thugs who want to kill,
but are genuinely interested in the defense of our country and are rather
worldly in their experience and views. The same goes for those who work for
the CIA. You would be surprised at the diversity of opinions of those who
work their.

Been there, heard that. The older I get the faster and smarter I was.

"RonSonic" wrote in message
...

In the meanwhile, the Democrat party may just learn to dump them by the
wayside
and return to being a legitimate force in national politics.

And winged lavender monkeys may just fly out of all our butts.

ZeMascouflatte wrote:

In article ,
R Brickston rb20170REMOVE.yahoo.com@ wrote:

Hey, Thanks! You, Michael Moore and Maureen Dowd helped swing the
votes that got Bush his victories.

you are confused my dear. and do not associate me with these characters,
i dispense my own brand of anger.

Quick - someone call the anonymous French dude a whaaaaambulance.

Eight years in a row.

Can I get a "whoo hoo"?

Mark Hickey
Habanero Cycles
http://www.habcycles.com
Home of the $795 ti frame

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:33:58 GMT, "Bill Sornson" wrote:

RonSonic wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:48:33 -0700, "GaryG"
wrote:

"ZeMascouflatte" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village
idiot, confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance
will be spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid
can morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the
freedom fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to
stand for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your
country right now functions according to the lowest common
denominator principle.

Don't blame me...I voted for the smarter guy (both times).

The one who got the higher GPA at Yale was Bush. The guy who ran
against Bush in 2000 didn't even graduate. Not J school or even
divinity school.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Nice. Wonder if it'll penetrate?

My mom, a lifelong Republican and Texan, refused to vote for moron
Bush...she referred to him as a "shifty-eyed weasel".

Unfortunately, there's too many dummies and too many religious
fundamentalist morons (was that a redundancy?) in this country.
You're right, however...electing the village idiot twice will go
down in history as a low point in US history.

I would consider the abject failure to find anyone competent to run
against him even more damning. A pair of arrogant buffoons with no
more claim to intellectual superiority than a superior attitude.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Nice. Wonder if it'll penetrate?

It never does, I just type this stuff to vent.

Ron

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:58:39 -0700, "GaryG" wrote:

"RonSonic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:48:33 -0700, "GaryG"
wrote:

"ZeMascouflatte" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the
freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.

Don't blame me...I voted for the smarter guy (both times).

The one who got the higher GPA at Yale was Bush. The guy who ran against
Bush in
2000 didn't even graduate. Not J school or even divinity school.

My mom, a lifelong Republican and Texan, refused to vote for moron
Bush...she referred to him as a "shifty-eyed weasel".

Unfortunately, there's too many dummies and too many religious
fundamentalist morons (was that a redundancy?) in this country. You're
right, however...electing the village idiot twice will go down in history
as
a low point in US history.

I would consider the abject failure to find anyone competent to run
against him
even more damning. A pair of arrogant buffoons with no more claim to
intellectual superiority than a superior attitude.

Ron

Have you *heard* Bush try to assemble a simple sentence?

Compared to most other world leaders, and most other US politicians, the
man's an idiot.

I'll take the sputterer and stutterer over the self-inflated buffoon who thinks
he's smarter than the rest of us.

Ron

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:44:51 GMT, "Bill Sornson" wrote:

RonSonic wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:59:50 GMT, "Bill Sornson" wrote:

David L. Johnson wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 13:53:20 -0500, ZeMascouflatte wrote:

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village
idiot,

Actually, we didn't. In 2000, the court, thanks to those appoined
by Poppi, did.

Bush 41 "appoined" the Democratic election officials in Florida --
including the Democrat who designed the ballot? He "appoined" a
majority of Supreme Court justices?

In 2004, Diebold did.

Blogcrap.

Gore lost. Kerry lost.

Get over it.

Why?

Let 'em wallow in their perceived injustice, stew and fume over the
wrongs of this evil corrupt world filled with 10,000 overlapping
conspiracies to keep the wealthiest, healthiest most free people in
the history of humanity in chains.

In the meanwhile, the Democrat party may just learn to dump them by
the wayside and return to being a legitimate force in national
politics.

I agree with everything you say. HOWEVER, the fact that they can't "get
over it" is manifested in the overt (as well as covert) undermining of the
Bush Administration /and/ the US military and intelligence agencies in
"really important ways" (think life and death...literally). There are many
who hate Bush so much that they actively root /against/ US interests just
because it harms his presidency (and because they lust for power
themselves). It's shameless...AND shameful.

The whole "loyal opposition" concept seems to have been lost somewhere.

Ron

"RonSonic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 19:58:39 -0700, "GaryG"
wrote:

"RonSonic" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:48:33 -0700, "GaryG"
wrote:

"ZeMascouflatte" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village
idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid
can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the
freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to
stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country
right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.

Don't blame me...I voted for the smarter guy (both times).

The one who got the higher GPA at Yale was Bush. The guy who ran
against
Bush in
2000 didn't even graduate. Not J school or even divinity school.

My mom, a lifelong Republican and Texan, refused to vote for moron
Bush...she referred to him as a "shifty-eyed weasel".

Unfortunately, there's too many dummies and too many religious
fundamentalist morons (was that a redundancy?) in this country.
You're
right, however...electing the village idiot twice will go down in
history
as
a low point in US history.

I would consider the abject failure to find anyone competent to run
against him
even more damning. A pair of arrogant buffoons with no more claim to
intellectual superiority than a superior attitude.

Ron

Have you *heard* Bush try to assemble a simple sentence?

Compared to most other world leaders, and most other US politicians, the
man's an idiot.

I'll take the sputterer and stutterer over the self-inflated buffoon who
thinks
he's smarter than the rest of us.

Yep...you and 50.1% of the country felt more comfortable voting for the
dummy you can relate to.

Clearly, Bush has crafted a persona as "good old boy" (even though he was a
silver-spooned frat boy), and a "good Christian" (even though he starts wars
on false pretext, and has never "cast out the moneychangers").

But, don't fret...your attitude of anit-intellectualism has long been a
hallmark of the American political scene. Smart guys having to "dumb down"
to get elected is standard fare....Bush is lucky in that he was already
there.

GG


Ron

in 516671 20060724 025112 "David L. Johnson" wrote:

Despite Gore's supposed claim, we (Americans) did indeed invent it. As
for "owning", that would be too much, but USENET at least has been an
English-preferred domain.

You obviously didn't see the Horizon program which explained how an Englishment
was responsible for what became the Internet.
You didn't invent TV either ;-)

in 516631 20060724 011202 "Chris" wrote:
The English usage in your first post was a lot better than the second one;
continue to work on your punctuation. Dispense is a odd word choice for the
context of the sentence. And, your use of "these" probably should be those,
but only if you had already named those you meant to reference in the
immediate previous sentence that was within the same paragraph.

Nope, you're wrong. His usage of "dispense" and "these" is standard in
English English. You may have your own dialect, but.