French Get A Dose Of The New Lance Armstrong

On 24 Jul 2006 21:01:27 -0700, "Chalo" wrote:

Bill Sornson wrote:

There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a horrible
speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/)

"Elected". With the help of some massive election fraud and the
intervention of a traitorous Supreme Court. I guess the PRI candidates
in Mexico purported to be "elected" all those years too.

and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The far-far
left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking the Democratic
party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Soros isn't "far-far left", he's just smart and rich, with the
perspective that comes from knowing what goes on outside the US.
Sheehan isn't "far-far left", she's just anti-war (and who could blame
her?) And Moore stakes his hope on the pack of scoundrels, toadies,
and collaborators otherwise known as the Democratic Party because he's
fundamentally conservative-- he's just not evil enough or blinkered
enough to be a Republican.

_I'm_ a leftist. Zoot is a leftist. Those public figures you
mentioned may be left of _your_ position, but just because they are in
opposition to Fascism does not make them leftists. That's like calling
someone a health fanatic because they don't want to get cancer.

If you are using the word "Fascism" to describe anything happening in modern
American mainstream politics then you are either far ****ing out there beyond
the radical left fringe or just an ignorant piece of **** who will say anything
in insult of those he disagrees with.

In either case you really are the kind of treasonous **** we were complaining
about having hijacked the Democrat party.

Go burn a flag or something.

Ron

On 24 Jul 2006 21:01:27 -0700, "Chalo" wrote:

Bill Sornson wrote:

There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a horrible
speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/)

"Elected". With the help of some massive election fraud

Absolutely no proof whatsoever and that left wing moron RFK, Jr's
bleatings in court filings are meaningless.

and the
intervention of a traitorous Supreme Court. I guess the PRI candidates
in Mexico purported to be "elected" all those years too.

Oh, I see, if the Supremes get invilved, it's their fault. Then if
Bush gets "really" elected, it must be some electronic voting
conspiracy. And if it wasn't that, then the liberals would have some
other conspiracy to blame it on.



and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The far-far
left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking the Democratic
party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Soros isn't "far-far left", he's just smart and rich, with the
perspective that comes from knowing what goes on outside the US.
Sheehan isn't "far-far left", she's just anti-war (and who could blame
her?) And Moore stakes his hope on the pack of scoundrels, toadies,
and collaborators otherwise known as the Democratic Party because he's
fundamentally conservative-- he's just not evil enough or blinkered
enough to be a Republican.

_I'm_ a leftist. Zoot is a leftist. Those public figures you
mentioned may be left of _your_ position, but just because they are in
opposition to Fascism does not make them leftists. That's like calling
someone a health fanatic because they don't want to get cancer.

HTH,

Chalo

Well, goody. This non-factual bs will help, along with the likes of
the left wing queen, Ms. Dowd (and her cohorts) to win the next
election for the Republicans.

HTH

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:29:11 -0400, RonSonic
wrote:

On 24 Jul 2006 21:01:27 -0700, "Chalo" wrote:

Bill Sornson wrote:

There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a horrible
speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/)

"Elected". With the help of some massive election fraud and the
intervention of a traitorous Supreme Court. I guess the PRI candidates
in Mexico purported to be "elected" all those years too.

and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The far-far
left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking the Democratic
party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Soros isn't "far-far left", he's just smart and rich, with the
perspective that comes from knowing what goes on outside the US.
Sheehan isn't "far-far left", she's just anti-war (and who could blame
her?) And Moore stakes his hope on the pack of scoundrels, toadies,
and collaborators otherwise known as the Democratic Party because he's
fundamentally conservative-- he's just not evil enough or blinkered
enough to be a Republican.

_I'm_ a leftist. Zoot is a leftist. Those public figures you
mentioned may be left of _your_ position, but just because they are in
opposition to Fascism does not make them leftists. That's like calling
someone a health fanatic because they don't want to get cancer.

If you are using the word "Fascism" to describe anything happening in modern
American mainstream politics then you are either far ****ing out there beyond
the radical left fringe or just an ignorant piece of **** who will say anything
in insult of those he disagrees with.

Or both.

In either case you really are the kind of treasonous **** we were complaining
about having hijacked the Democrat party.

Go burn a flag or something.

Ron

RonSonic wrote:
On 24 Jul 2006 21:01:27 -0700, "Chalo" wrote:

Bill Sornson wrote:

There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a
horrible speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/)

"Elected". With the help of some massive election fraud and the
intervention of a traitorous Supreme Court. I guess the PRI
candidates in Mexico purported to be "elected" all those years too.

Too bad the Dems in FL couldn't competently fix it themselves; God knows
they tried.

and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The
far-far left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking
the Democratic party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Soros isn't "far-far left", he's just smart and rich, with the
perspective that comes from knowing what goes on outside the US.
Sheehan isn't "far-far left", she's just anti-war (and who could
blame her?)

She thinks (or at least says) that Chavez is a benevolent leader and Bush is
a terrorist "fuehrer". Very mainstream stuff.

And Moore stakes his hope on the pack of scoundrels,
toadies, and collaborators otherwise known as the Democratic Party
because he's fundamentally conservative-- he's just not evil enough
or blinkered enough to be a Republican.

That why he made an entire film full of flat-out lies in an attempt to bring
down Bush?

_I'm_ a leftist. Zoot is a leftist. Those public figures you
mentioned may be left of _your_ position, but just because they are
in opposition to Fascism does not make them leftists. That's like
calling someone a health fanatic because they don't want to get
cancer.

Ron wrote:

If you are using the word "Fascism" to describe anything happening in
modern American mainstream politics then you are either far ****ing
out there beyond the radical left fringe or just an ignorant piece of
**** who will say anything in insult of those he disagrees with.

Google Chalo and Pat Tillman sometime. Will tell you all you need to know.

In either case you really are the kind of treasonous **** we were
complaining about having hijacked the Democrat party.

See Bill Clinton campaigning for Lieberman today? Can you say "back room
DEAL"? LOL

Go burn a flag or something.

Jeez, I wasn't even going to reply since he didn't get /too/ personally
abusive this time! I /do/ admire his restraint

R Brickston wrote:

Well, goody. This non-factual bs will help, along with the likes of
the left wing queen, Ms. Dowd (and her cohorts) to win the next
election for the Republicans.

Yo. Political insults aside, can one of you true-blue (excuse me,
true-red) patriot gentlemen explain to me the "Maureen Dowd,
empress of the radical left" meme? I mean, I know a bunch of
liberals, lefties, pinko comsymps, and even some Democrats,
and Mo Dowd hardly seems to be one of their guide stars -
not exactly up there with Marx, Engels, Seymour Hersh and
Katha Pollitt. I can't recall anyone ever asking me "Did you
read that Mo Dowd column??!" (but that _does_ happen with
Sy Hersh's articles). In fact, the _lefty_ critique of Mo Dowd used
to be that her column was cutting but shallow. So when did
she take over the radical islamo-appeaser Democrat Party?
And why didn't I get the memo? Is my ACLU card expired?

wrote:
And why didn't I get the memo? Is my ACLU card expired?

No, you've been using your LiveDrunk(tm) card too often.

wrote:
But there's a municipal ordinance against being Jeremy Clarkson.
It's quite civilized actually.

So presumably you need a license to own a Jeremy Clarkson.

"GaryG" a écrit dans le message de news:
...
"RonSonic" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:48:33 -0700, "GaryG"
wrote:

"ZeMascouflatte" wrote in message
...
In article ,
(Way Back Jack) wrote:

Ha Ha Ha, betcha the frogs are crying in their snail soup this
evening. Watch the accusations of doping, 'roids, etc.

i don't think the french will cry for anything american these days.
you demonstrated your total idiocy when you elected the village idiot,
confirmed it with a second term to make sure your arrogance will be
spread far and away.
the real question is not about the 'frogs', but how ****ing stupid can
morons like you be?
what are you going to call the tour now? freedom tour? after the
freedom
fries and other bull****.
people like you are a disgrace to what the united states used to stand
for. you are a pathetic clod, and one of the reason your country right
now functions according to the lowest common denominator principle.

Don't blame me...I voted for the smarter guy (both times).

The one who got the higher GPA at Yale was Bush. The guy who ran against
Bush in
2000 didn't even graduate. Not J school or even divinity school.

My mom, a lifelong Republican and Texan, refused to vote for moron
Bush...she referred to him as a "shifty-eyed weasel".

Unfortunately, there's too many dummies and too many religious
fundamentalist morons (was that a redundancy?) in this country. You're
right, however...electing the village idiot twice will go down in
history
as
a low point in US history.

I would consider the abject failure to find anyone competent to run
against him
even more damning. A pair of arrogant buffoons with no more claim to
intellectual superiority than a superior attitude.

Ron

Have you *heard* Bush try to assemble a simple sentence?

Compared to most other world leaders, and most other US politicians, the
man's an idiot.

GG

Compared to most other idiots, the man's an idiot

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 05:55:52 GMT, "Bill Sornson" wrote:

RonSonic wrote:
On 24 Jul 2006 21:01:27 -0700, "Chalo" wrote:

Bill Sornson wrote:

There's a very fine but definite line
between people like you who call Bush an idiot (granted he's a
horrible speaker and yet he's been elected POTUS /twice/)

"Elected". With the help of some massive election fraud and the
intervention of a traitorous Supreme Court. I guess the PRI
candidates in Mexico purported to be "elected" all those years too.

Too bad the Dems in FL couldn't competently fix it themselves; God knows
they tried.

and those who hate him so
much that they actively undermine nearly everything he does. The
far-far left (Soros, Sheehan, Moore... Chalo LOL ) is high-jacking
the Democratic party; no brainwashing required to see that.

Soros isn't "far-far left", he's just smart and rich, with the
perspective that comes from knowing what goes on outside the US.
Sheehan isn't "far-far left", she's just anti-war (and who could
blame her?)

She thinks (or at least says) that Chavez is a benevolent leader and Bush is
a terrorist "fuehrer". Very mainstream stuff.

And Moore stakes his hope on the pack of scoundrels,
toadies, and collaborators otherwise known as the Democratic Party
because he's fundamentally conservative-- he's just not evil enough
or blinkered enough to be a Republican.

That why he made an entire film full of flat-out lies in an attempt to bring
down Bush?

_I'm_ a leftist. Zoot is a leftist. Those public figures you
mentioned may be left of _your_ position, but just because they are
in opposition to Fascism does not make them leftists. That's like
calling someone a health fanatic because they don't want to get
cancer.

Ron wrote:

If you are using the word "Fascism" to describe anything happening in
modern American mainstream politics then you are either far ****ing
out there beyond the radical left fringe or just an ignorant piece of
**** who will say anything in insult of those he disagrees with.

Google Chalo and Pat Tillman sometime. Will tell you all you need to know.

No, thank you. I think I figured that one out.

In either case you really are the kind of treasonous **** we were
complaining about having hijacked the Democrat party.

See Bill Clinton campaigning for Lieberman today? Can you say "back room
DEAL"? LOL

This hurts to say it or even to think it. Of the present national level
Democrats out there now, Bill and Hill are among the most sane. Both appear to
understand the necessity of Iraq, and of course they both believe it would be
better if they were in charge, but they do understand the need. And both can be
pushed, encouraged, boxed into a corner where they are forced to do the right
thing.

They both run their mouths and talk big, but don't usually slip off into bizarre
fantasy like Dean and Kerry and the like.

Go burn a flag or something.

Jeez, I wasn't even going to reply since he didn't get /too/ personally
abusive this time! I /do/ admire his restraint

A category I'm a little weak on sometimes.

Ron

On 24 Jul 2006 23:35:37 -0700, "
wrote:

R Brickston wrote:

Well, goody. This non-factual bs will help, along with the likes of
the left wing queen, Ms. Dowd (and her cohorts) to win the next
election for the Republicans.

Yo. Political insults aside, can one of you true-blue (excuse me,
true-red) patriot gentlemen explain to me the "Maureen Dowd,
empress of the radical left" meme? I mean, I know a bunch of
liberals, lefties, pinko comsymps, and even some Democrats,
and Mo Dowd hardly seems to be one of their guide stars -
not exactly up there with Marx, Engels, Seymour Hersh and
Katha Pollitt. I can't recall anyone ever asking me "Did you
read that Mo Dowd column??!" (but that _does_ happen with
Sy Hersh's articles). In fact, the _lefty_ critique of Mo Dowd used
to be that her column was cutting but shallow. So when did
she take over the radical islamo-appeaser Democrat Party?
And why didn't I get the memo? Is my ACLU card expired?

I wouldn't be surprised if she simply ****ed off conservatives more than she
inspired libs. And I don't really know that she attacks the conservatives for
any greater reason than that she simply finds them easier from her perspective.
She's beaten on a few liberals from time to time, but rarely. I think the main
point is that she generates snark and snap and the particular target is
relatively unimportant.

Sorta like Ann Coulter without the law degree and smarts. I don't think there
are any conservatives who see Coulter as a leading light, an amusing read with
an occasional truth. Same with MoDo, probably fun, but not like you'll learn
anything.

Ron